9.3.2020

Coronavirus – Secure Your Business-Critical Issues

As the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak continues to impact global markets, corporate management and shareholders are being forced to prepare for a prolonged epidemic. Can disruptions due to the virus be invoked as force majeure if they prevent a company from fulfilling its contractual obligations? Can a listed company alter its general meeting plans? We provide some principles and advice below.

You might also be interested in:  Coronavirus Epidemic: FAQ for Finnish Employers.

Duty of Care Obligates Managers to Act

The principles enacted in the Finnish Limited Liability Companies Act state that the management of a company—i.e. the board of directors and managing director—are guided by a duty of care towards the company and its shareholders. The duty of care requires active measures. It requires the management to secure the company’s interests and ensure that the company is in compliance with the law and authority requirements, and the coronavirus outbreak provides no exception to this. In practice, this means that the management must continually monitor the situation, analyse the impacts of the epidemic and attempt to mitigate risks.

Identify Critical Agreements and Supply Chains

Authorities across the globe have imposed restrictions in order to stem the spread of the virus, and many companies have taken voluntary precautions. These include quarantines, travel bans or, for example, temporary closures of factories and offices.

These restrictions have caused resource shortages, disruptions in international supply and distribution chains, and other business challenges. As a result, many companies have had to delay their performance of their contractual obligations or have been completely unable to fulfil them.

It is up to management to assess what business-critical contracts and supply chains could be disrupted due to the coronavirus. In the case of contract chains, it is important to ask your contracting parties to carry out a similar analysis in order to be able to manage the risks of the entire chain.

Assess Force Majeure Separately for Each Contract

If a company is unable to fulfil its contracts, the question becomes whether the disruptions caused by the coronavirus could constitute a force majeure event. A force majeure would exceptionally release the contracting party from its contractual performance obligations.

The existence of a force majeure has to be assessed based on the wording of each individual contract. Here are a few rules of thumb:

– The force majeure clause may limit force majeure to only the examples explicitly stated in the clause, and these kinds of lists cannot generally be interpreted expansively.

– The threshold for a force majeure is usually high. As a result, companies need to give careful consideration to whether a contract can be fulfilled in a timely fashion in some alternative way despite disruptions caused by the coronavirus.

– Invoking force majeure often requires that the obstacle could not be foreseen. If entering into a contract after the start of the outbreak, it is best to mention disruptions caused by the coronavirus as an example of force majeure circumstances, otherwise it may not be possible to invoke the clause.

– Force majeure clauses also may set forth a procedure for invoking force majeure. For example, a party must often give the other party written notice within a certain amount of time from the occurrence of the force majeure.

Depending on the circumstances and the applicable law, a contracting party may be released from liability for damage caused by non-performance even without an express clause if the damage was caused, for example, due to an event beyond the control of that party or the party can prove they acted with care.

Continue Fulfilling Your Contractual Obligations as Best You Can

An event that disrupts the fulfilment of a contract will only exceptionally release a company from its contractual obligations completely. If a company is able to fulfil some of its contractual obligations despite a force majeure, it must do so.

As soon as the force majeure ends, the performance of the contract must be continued immediately. The party invoking force majeure is also always obligated to minimise the damage caused by the disruption to themselves and their contractual partners.

Identify Disruptions and Give a Timely Notice

Management can best secure their company’s interests when they identify threatening disruptions in good time, document disruptions and their causes and consequences, and make sure that the company issues its own notifications and notices to its contractual partners in the prescribed time limits. If the contract does not provide time limits for issuing notices or other notifications, they must be issued in a reasonable time. It is also worth reviewing your business insurance policies and make sure that any damage events are notified within the time required by the insurance terms.

Publish Changed Outlooks

The coronavirus has already had an impact on business, but its effects will be seen in companies in many different ways and spans of time. Listed companies have to assess their outlooks during the current financial period and monitor the realisation of their forecasts and guidance. If the epidemic causes significant changes to business and previously published forecasts and guidance, this needs to be published as a profit warning as soon as possible.

Consider Exceptional Arrangements for Your General Meeting

The general meetings season is at its peak for listed companies, and it is natural that the coronavirus is giving companies and shareholders preparing for their general meetings pause for thought. Certain aspects of meeting arrangements can be altered on short notice. For example, the meeting venue stated in the notice convening the general meeting can in exceptional circumstances be changed prior to the opening of the meeting.

The Finnish Companies Act allows a general meeting to be held elsewhere than in the municipality stated in the articles of association, but this requires a very weighty reason.

The act also permits shareholders to participate in general meetings remotely. Euroclear Finland has the capability to carry out electronic advance voting for general meetings if the situation requires.

Look into the Possibility for Virtual Closing in Mergers and Acquisitions 

The coronavirus epidemic may affect mergers and acquisitions that have already been signed or that are being prepared. It is worth including wording in SPAs that the transaction can be closed virtually. This will ensure that the closing will not be prevented even if one of the parties is unable to travel to sign the necessary documents, for example, due to their company’s internal guidelines.

It is also worth reviewing the seller’s representations and warranties in the SPA with an eye to how they might be affected by the epidemic. Other customary SPA clauses—such as long-stop dates and business between signing and closing—should be reviewed with particular care to ensure they provide enough flexibility.

Latest references

We acted as Finnish counsel to Pernod Ricard in the sale of a portfolio of local Nordic brands to Oy Hartwall Ab, an affiliate of the Danish group Royal Unibrew. Pernod Ricard is a worldwide leader in the spirits and wine industry. The local portfolio of brands includes spirits, liqueurs and Finnish wine brands, the best-known being the liqueur Minttu, along with their related production assets based in Turku, Finland. The closing of the transaction remains subject to customary conditions.
Case published 21.10.2024
We act as the lead legal counsel in the groundbreaking case of Multitude SE’s (Multitude) proposed relocation from Finland to Switzerland. The first phase of the relocation, involving the transfer of Multitude’s registered office from Finland to Malta pursuant to SE Regulation, was successfully completed on 30 June 2024. In this connection, Multitude’s shares were removed from the Finnish book-entry system and the issuer central securities depository of the shares changed from Euroclear Finland Oy to the CSD operated by the Malta Stock Exchange. In practice, all of Multitude’s shares are now held through Clearstream. In Malta, the company is anticipated to be converted into a public limited liability company under Maltese law, following which it will seek redomiciliation from Malta to Switzerland. Given that Finnish legislation does not allow for direct relocation to a non-European Economic Area country such as Switzerland while preserving the company’s legal personality, the process necessitated a multi-jurisdictional strategy as outlined above. Our mandate encompasses advising Multitude on all aspects governed by Finnish law concerning the proposed relocation and coordinating the work of local legal counsel and various other advisors involved in the project. The process also involved a written procedure to amend Multitude’s existing subordinated capital notes and senior bonds to facilitate the relocation as well as placement of EUR 80 million senior guaranteed notes by a newly established Multitude Capital Oyj. ”The transfer to Malta marks a significant step in Multitude’s journey. This pioneering and complex process has been successfully implemented with the invaluable support of our own team and advisors. Castrén & Snellman has masterfully orchestrated the entire project, ensuring seamless coordination across multiple jurisdictions. We look forward to achieving our next step with the further relocation to Switzerland”, says Jorma Jokela, Multitude’s CEO. Multitude is a fully regulated growth platform for financial technology, employing over 700 individuals across 25 countries. Its shares are listed on the regulated market (Prime Standard) of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
Case published 1.7.2024
We advise Evli, a leading Nordic investment and wealth management company, in a strategic partnership with Bregal Milestone. The objective of the strategic partnership is to grow the business of Evli Alexander Incentives Oy. In connection with the strategic partnership and to reflect its new vision and strategy, Evli Alexander Incentives Oy will be rebranded to Allshares Oy. As part of the partnership arrangement Bregal Milestone has agreed to invest over EUR 65 million in Allshares to acquire shares owned by certain minority shareholders and to fund future organic and inorganic growth in the company. Following completion of the arrangement, Bregal Milestone will own 55 percent of the shares and votes in Allshares, Evli Plc will own 42 percent, and Allshares’ management will own the remaining 3 percent. The arrangement will mark a significant strategic and financial partnership for Evli Plc and is expected to increase the value of Evli Plc’s ownership in Allshares over a longer period. ‘We are very excited to partner with Bregal Milestone, who shares our vision of becoming the leading provider of share-based incentive and compensation plan management and design in Europe and beyond. With their support, we will be able to accelerate our growth, invest in our platform, and enter new markets. We believe that this partnership will create significant value for our clients, employees, and shareholders,’ Maunu Lehtimäki, CEO of Evli comments. Bregal Milestone is a leading European growth private equity firm and enjoys a strong track record in scaling Nordic champions across Europe via organic and inorganic growth. Bregal Milestone will bring strategic guidance, operational support, financial resources, and access to its deep network of partners and contacts to accelerate organic and inorganic growth of Allshares.
Case published 7.3.2024
We advised SATO Corporation and lead manager Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) Helsinki Branch in a rights issue. SATO received gross proceeds of approximately EUR 200 million from the issue. SATO Corporation is an expert in sustainable rental housing and one of Finland’s largest rental housing providers. SATO owns around 25,000 rental homes in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Tampere and Turku. Approximately 45,000 residents live in SATOhomes.
Case published 29.2.2024