26.2.2020

Coronavirus Epidemic: FAQ for Finnish Employers

The coronavirus (COVID-19) that originated in China has become an epidemic that countries are attempting to contain by restricting movement. The situation raises a number of questions at workplaces. What happens if employees are quarantined abroad? Can companies lay off or terminate employees if the epidemic harms their business? We answer some frequently asked questions below.

You might also be interested in:  Coronavirus – Secure Your Business-Critical Issues.

Absence from Work Permitted, but Not Necessarily Paid

If an employee misses work, for example, due to a cancelled flight, quarantine or other mandatory reason relating to the epidemic, the absence is permissible, and employment law sanctions cannot be imposed on the employee due to it.

However, even when there is an acceptable reason for it, the absence is not necessarily paid. Employers are not legally obligated to pay wages or salary for the duration of an absence that is due to a quarantine or isolation imposed by the authorities unless the employee themself is sick.

Though employers are not obligated to pay, some employers have continued to pay their employees if they have been caught by a quarantine while on a business trip. If Kela grants the employee an infectious disease allowance due to a quarantine, the allowance will be paid to the employer to the extent the employer has paid the employee during the absence. The allowance covers the full loss of income and has no deductible period.

Annual Holiday Accrues During Quarantine

From the perspective of the accrual of annual holiday, a quarantine imposed by the authorities is equated to being at work, and employees earn holiday normally for the duration of the quarantine. The same rule applies if an employee is placed in isolation, for example, due to a family member having fallen ill.

Layoffs Require Cooperation Negotiations

Some companies have been forced to consider layoffs and other cost-saving measures due to the disruptions the epidemic has caused to their business. However, an epidemic is not considered a particularly weighty and unforeseeable event that would allow employers to take action without cooperation negotiations. It is important for companies to remember to start cooperation procedures as soon as they begin planning measures that could lead to layoffs or terminations.

Update Your Company’s Instructions

Employers should provide their employees instructions on what to do if they fall ill. For example, the Confederation of Finnish Industries (EK) recommends that employees should be allowed to take a sick leave of a few days without a doctor’s certificate during the epidemic.

The Occupational Safety and Health Act obligates employers to ensure the safety of employees even when on overseas business trips. Employers need to keep an eye on authority instructions and travel restrictions and update their workplace instructions as needed. It is worth making sure whether your company’s travel insurance covers additional costs caused by the coronavirus. Employees going on business trips should be given detailed instructions on what to do if they believe they have been infected during the trip or after returning home.

It is also a good idea to review your remote working practices and consider how to arrange work if the epidemic were to lead to a widespread quarantine in Finland.

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy. 
Case published 9.9.2026