More and more companies are putting sustainability at the forefront of their strategies and are looking for ways to combat climate change. Customers and investors expect companies to act ethically and respect human rights.
24.9.2020
What Does Sustainability Mean to a Corporate Lawyer?
Anna Kuusniemi-Laine
In the midst of this, companies are turning to their legal advisors for knowledge about good, sustainable practices — not just about what the law or courts says is legal. Legal work is changing, and I think that it is changing for the better.
SUSTAINABILITY EXTENDS THROUGHOUT BUSINESS LAW
Lawyers seems to have discovered sustainability work a bit late, though we are in a position to have a significant impact. Sustainability issues extend far beyond environmental law. Nearly every contract brings with it the opportunity to make a difference.
It is difficult to think of a field of law that wouldn’t involve some aspect of sustainability. Green finance is becoming more common, and contract templates are evolving. In mergers and acquisitions, sustainability issues come up in due diligence reviews and can impact purchase prices, and there is much work that could be done in energy sector contractual structures.
Public procurement projects should be implemented sustainably. If competitors want to work together to reduce emissions, they need a competition law assessment. Business intelligence needs to be based on the responsible use of data, and merely knowing the GDPR by rote is not enough. Anti-corruption work needs functional compliance practices and whistleblowing channels.
IMPACT THROUGH NEW FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The pursuit of impact is also creating entirely new kinds of work for lawyers. Impact investing and impact funds have already gained a foothold. In impact investing, private capital is not only used to pursue a profit, but also measurable benefits for society, and it is being promoted as one possible solution to the increasing challenges faced by the public sector.
NEW CAREER PATHS FOR LAWYERS
The changes that are going on in the world are a call to lifelong learning and are creating new, interesting career paths for future generations of lawyers. Who would have thought just a few years ago that the UN’s sustainable development goals could be a major part of business lawyer’s work?
DOING OUR PART
At the beginning of 2020, Castrén & Snellman became the first Finnish law firm to join the Global Compact. There are three pillars to sustainability at C&S: our own sustainability, sustainability advice for clients and impact on society.
We can have the biggest impact through helping our clients develop their own sustainability. In addition to the UN Global Compact, our sustainability work is anchored in the UN’s sustainable development goals. Our key goals are to promote equality, fight climate change and promote the rule of law.
This blog was first published in 18.8.2020.
Latest insights
Article published 3.3.2026 – Employment
The threshold for dismissal is lowered: what should be taken into account in practice?
Article published 6.2.2026 – Tax & Structuring
Electricity sector Profit Tax Act in conflict with EU law – SAC denied leave to appeal
Article published 2.2.2026 – Data & Technology
Avoid costly risks with well-drafted distribution agreements
Article published 14.1.2026 – Tax & Structuring
VAT deductions for private equity investors under the microscope
Aleksandra Särkelä
Janne Juusela & Mikko Alakare
Topi Lusenius & Samuli Salminen
Mikko Alakare & Lotta Manu
Latest references
Fortum – AI workshop
We delivered two AI workshops for Fortum Corporation’s Mergers and Acquisitions team, with both legal and business professionals participating. The sessions combined fundamental AI principles with custom use cases for commercially available AI tools tailored to Fortum’s needs. We also presented a bespoke solution merging AI with a script-based tool developed by our Legal Tech team, enabling a more automated way of working. Our experts conducted the training drawing on their legal background and leading experience in this emerging field of legal technology. Participants particularly appreciated the clarity and relevance of the implementations demonstrated. ‘C&S delivered an excellent, well-structured series of workshops, with directly applicable takeaways,’ says Sabina Hautaviita, Legal Counsel for M&A at Fortum.
Case published 9.3.2026
VR – Supreme Court decision clarifies working time practices
We successfully represented VR Group before the Supreme Court in a case concerning the meal break practice of commuter train drivers. On 6 February 2026, the Supreme Court ruled in VR’s favour (decision KKO:2026:12), confirming that VR had the right to amend the commuter train drivers’ meal break practice in 2021 by rendering the break unpaid in accordance with the applicable collective agreement. This decision clarifies the interpretation of collective agreements and employment legislation as well as the limits of the employer’s right to direct work. Over 250 commuter train drivers challenged the unpaid meal break practice which VR introduced in April 2021. Before the change, meal breaks had a long history of being paid. The change was based on the train drivers’ collective agreement, which allows for meal breaks to be organised either as paid or unpaid time. The Supreme Court ruled that the scheduling and managing of breaks falls within the core area of the employer’s right to direct work. This increases the threshold for an established practice becoming a binding condition for the parties. Merely following a practice consistently and over a long period of time does not make the practice binding; instead, the employer’s intent to commit to the practice must be clearly evident from the employer’s conduct or other circumstances. As both alternatives – paid and unpaid – for organising meal breaks had been retained in the collective agreement despite other amendments over the years, it could not be considered that VR had intended to commit to the paid break practice and waive its right to direct work as regards break scheduling. It was also significant that the employment contracts explicitly referred only to the collective agreement as regards working time. The Supreme Court deemed that the employees’ paid meal break was not an established term of employment and that VR was entitled to change the practice based on the collective agreement. The employer had the right, by virtue of its right to direct work, to unilaterally change the meal break practice by choosing to apply the other arrangement permitted by the collective agreement.
Case published 3.3.2026
CapMan Growth – Investment in Kuntokeskus Liikku
We are assisting CapMan Growth in its significant investment in Kuntokeskus Liikku, a Finnish gym chain known for its high-quality self-service facilities and excellent value for money. The investment will further strengthen Liikku’s position as a market leader and support the continued execution of its growth strategy. Liikku is one of Finland’s leading fitness chains, with more than 70 locations across the country serving nearly 90,000 members. The company’s concept is to offer high-quality self-service gyms at an exceptionally competitive price point which, combined with strong operational efficiency, provides a solid foundation for profitable growth. The company’s main shareholder is COR Group, a long-time partner of CapMan Growth, and a Finnish health and wellness conglomerate known for active ownership and long-term value creation. CapMan Growth is a leading Finnish growth investor that makes significant investments in entrepreneur-led growth companies with a turnover of €10–200 million. CapMan Growth is part of CapMan, which is a leading Nordic private equity investor engaged in active value creation work. CapMan has been listed on the Helsinki Stock Exchange since 2001.
Case published 27.2.2026
Terrafame – Environmental and water management permit processes concerning the company’s entire operations and the KL1 side rock area
Castrén & Snellman successfully assisted Terrafame Ltd in environmental and water management permit processes concerning the company’s entire operations and the KL1 side rock area, on which the Supreme Administrative Court issued its decision on 12 February 2026 (KHO 366/2026 and 367/2026). The changes made to the decisions of the Vaasa Administrative Court as a result of Terrafame’s appeals, enable the company to implement its new strategy and develop its operations as planned. The decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court brought the nearly ten-year-long permit process to a close.
Case published 20.2.2026