More and more companies are putting sustainability at the forefront of their strategies and are looking for ways to combat climate change. Customers and investors expect companies to act ethically and respect human rights.
24.9.2020
What Does Sustainability Mean to a Corporate Lawyer?
Anna Kuusniemi-Laine
In the midst of this, companies are turning to their legal advisors for knowledge about good, sustainable practices — not just about what the law or courts says is legal. Legal work is changing, and I think that it is changing for the better.
SUSTAINABILITY EXTENDS THROUGHOUT BUSINESS LAW
Lawyers seems to have discovered sustainability work a bit late, though we are in a position to have a significant impact. Sustainability issues extend far beyond environmental law. Nearly every contract brings with it the opportunity to make a difference.
It is difficult to think of a field of law that wouldn’t involve some aspect of sustainability. Green finance is becoming more common, and contract templates are evolving. In mergers and acquisitions, sustainability issues come up in due diligence reviews and can impact purchase prices, and there is much work that could be done in energy sector contractual structures.
Public procurement projects should be implemented sustainably. If competitors want to work together to reduce emissions, they need a competition law assessment. Business intelligence needs to be based on the responsible use of data, and merely knowing the GDPR by rote is not enough. Anti-corruption work needs functional compliance practices and whistleblowing channels.
IMPACT THROUGH NEW FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The pursuit of impact is also creating entirely new kinds of work for lawyers. Impact investing and impact funds have already gained a foothold. In impact investing, private capital is not only used to pursue a profit, but also measurable benefits for society, and it is being promoted as one possible solution to the increasing challenges faced by the public sector.
NEW CAREER PATHS FOR LAWYERS
The changes that are going on in the world are a call to lifelong learning and are creating new, interesting career paths for future generations of lawyers. Who would have thought just a few years ago that the UN’s sustainable development goals could be a major part of business lawyer’s work?
DOING OUR PART
At the beginning of 2020, Castrén & Snellman became the first Finnish law firm to join the Global Compact. There are three pillars to sustainability at C&S: our own sustainability, sustainability advice for clients and impact on society.
We can have the biggest impact through helping our clients develop their own sustainability. In addition to the UN Global Compact, our sustainability work is anchored in the UN’s sustainable development goals. Our key goals are to promote equality, fight climate change and promote the rule of law.
This blog was first published in 18.8.2020.
Latest insights
Article published 15.5.2025
Latest regulatory developments for renewable energy in Finland
Article published 9.4.2025 – Dispute Resolution
New European Court of Justice ruling C-537/23 sheds light on the interpretation and validity of asymmetric jurisdiction clauses – Implications for European businesses
Article published 7.4.2025 – Private Equity & Venture Capital
Tax credit for major clean transition investments passed in Parliament – application period until 29 August 2025
Article published 25.3.2025 – Mergers & Acquisitions
How to successfully run a large-scale cross-border M&A project?
Marius af Schultén & Konsta Peussa
Robin Ollus & Tuomas Lehtinen
Janne Juusela, Mikko Alakare, Samuli Tarkiainen, Marius af Schultén, Jarno Tanhuanpää, Kanerva Sunila & Noora Ahonen
Carola Lindholm & Samuli Tarkiainen
Latest references
eQ Community Properties Fund – Sale of two healthcare properties
We assisted eQ Community Properties Fund in the sale of two healthcare properties to a fund managed by Northern Horizon. The properties have a total floor area of approximately 3,500 square meters. The two properties are located in Espoo and Lahti. The Espoo asset was completed in 2018 and the Lahti asset was completed in 2023. Both assets are operated by Attendo, the leading care provider in the Nordic region.
Case published 9.5.2025
BMW AG – Enforcement of BMW’s trademark and design rights
We successfully represented BMW in an exceptionally long dispute over whether the spare rims sold by the defendant and the hub caps included in them infringed BMW’s trademark and design rights. The Market Court found that the sign used by the defendant caused a likelihood of confusion with BMW’s trademarks. The defendant had used the sign on the hub caps and in the marketing of the hub caps and rims, leading the Market Court to find that the defendant had infringed BMW’s trademark rights. The defendant admitted to infringing BMW’s Community design but denied the related injunction claim. However, the Market Court found that there was no particular reason to refrain from issuing an injunction. The Market Court prohibited the defendant from continuing to infringe BMW’s trademarks and Community design and ordered the defendant to alter or destroy the products and marketing materials that infringed BMW’s rights. Furthermore, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay BMW EUR 70,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 80,000 in damages for the trademark infringements, as well as EUR 7,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 8,000 in damages for the design right infringement. The amounts can be considered exceptionally high in Finland. Additionally, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay a significant portion of BMW’s legal costs with interest on late payment. In its decision of 11 March 2025, the Supreme Court of Finland did not grant the defendant leave to appeal, and also decided that there was no need to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union. Thus, the Market Court’s judgements (MAO:494/18 ja 517/2023) are final. In addition to the main dispute, BMW demanded in a separate proceeding that one of the defendant’s trademark registrations be revoked. A total of three separate legal proceedings were conducted in the Market Court regarding the revocation. The defendant’s trademark registration was ultimately revoked.
Case published 9.5.2025
DNA – Global brand portfolio management and IP enforcement
We are advising DNA Plc in brand protection and intellectual property enforcement matters globally. Our intellectual property team manages DNA’s global trademark portfolio, including registration, prosecution, opposition and enforcement. We also advise DNA in questions concerning consumer and marketing law, unfair competition, social media, domain names and cybersquatting. DNA Plc is one of Finland’s leading telecommunication companies. DNA offers connections, services and devices for homes and workplaces, contributing to the digitalisation of society. The company has approximately 3.7 million subscriptions in its fixed and mobile communications networks. In 2024, DNA’s total revenue was EUR 1,100 million, and the company employs about 1,600 people around Finland. DNA is part of Telenor Group.
Case published 7.5.2025
Foodiq – Restructuring proceedings
Castrén & Snellman’s Attorney Christer Svartström acted as the administrator in the restructuring proceedings of Foodiq Oy, which began on 11 March 2024. Foodiq is a unique future food focused company that develops and produces plant and milk-based products for both the private and public sectors. The company’s largest shareholder is a Swedish investment company focusing on FoodTec, Nicoya AB. The majority of creditors approved the draft restructuring programme in expedited proceedings after restructuring proceedings that lasted just under a year. The District Court of Helsinki affirmed the restructuring programme including the one-day payment programme on 10 March 2025 and appointed Attorney Christer Svartström as the supervisor of the programme. In cooperation with the parties, they found an effective and quick restructuring solution for the company, avoiding a long-term programme and allowing the company to focus on its core business. The restructuring programme was financed by investments made by the company’s investors. At the same time, the one-day programme provided a better outcome for creditors compared to a longer programme. The implementation of the restructuring programme ended successfully on 28 March 2025.
Case published 6.5.2025