Regulatory Investigations and Disputes

Regulatory Investigations and Disputes

Disputes relating to data protection and data regulation are on the rise. We offer you a team with a solid experience in authority proceedings and disputes in the field of data protection and regulation.

The increasing value of personal and other data also means that contracting parties are becoming more vigilant in protecting their interests, and people are more aware of their rights with respect to data processing. Sometimes the parties’ interests and rights intersect to such an extent that it is necessary to resort to dispute resolution procedures.

Our highly experienced experts regularly assist clients in administrative, civil and criminal proceedings. We have received a great deal of praise from clients for our efficient and skilled handling of proceedings and our wide range of expertise and understanding of regulation, technology and business.

Latest references

Finnish Motor Insurers’ Centre – Precedent concerning patient data processing and repeal of administrative fine

The Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) issued a significant precedent (decision KHO:2025:23) in a case in which it found that the Finnish Motor Insurers’ Centre (Liikennevakuutuskeskus, LVK) processed patient data in accordance with the requirements concerning fairness, data minimisation, and privacy by design and by default when deciding on compensation claims. We represented LVK in this case in which the SAC upheld the Administrative Court’s decision to repeal the EUR 52,000 administrative fine imposed on LVK by the Sanctions Board of the Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman. The SAC also confirmed the Administrative Court’s decision, which, as far as we know, was the first of its kind in Finland, ordering the Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman to reimburse some of our client’s legal costs. The decision bears great significance for the insurance industry as a whole. The crux of the matter were LVK’s information requests under the Motor Liability Insurance Act for patient data that were essential in determining insurance or compensation claims. In certain cases, making a decision may require extensive patient data. The Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman had found that LVK had systematically made overly broad information requests infringing Articles 5 and 25 of the GDPR and that the information should have been provided in the form of separate medical opinions. The Administrative Court repealed the Data Protection Ombudsman’s decision and found that patient records from medical appointments are, as a general rule, essential in establishing causality in compensation matters. It also stated that the tasks related to the consideration of compensation matters are specifically the core tasks of the insurance company and not of the controller of patient data. Furthermore, the Administrative Court found no evidence indicating that LVK would have systematically made overly broad information requests. ‘Once again, our collaboration with C&S was seamless throughout this extensive process, and we could trust that our case was in expert hands’, says Visa Kronbäck, Chief Legal Officer of the Insurance Centre. The full decision is available on the SAC website (in Finnish): KHO:2025:23.

Yellow Film Studios – Merger of Yellow Film Studios and REinvent Studios

We advised Yellow Film Studios, the largest independent film and television production company in the Nordics, in its strategic merger with Danish film industry sales and financing studio REinvent Studios. Together they form Reinvent Yellow, a unified hub for television and film production, sales, financing and innovation, combining over three decades of production experience and a vast catalogue of titles.

International reinsurance companies – Ad hoc arbitration proceedings

We successfully represented a panel of reinsurance companies in an international ad hoc arbitration. The dispute arose out of a reinsurance treaty under the terms of which the reinsurers had reinsured a portfolio of risks underwritten by the cedent. The parties disagreed as to whether the reinsurance provided coverage for a certain loss that had occurred because of the market turmoil caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The case involved highly complex legal and contractual questions requiring special expertise on reinsurance law and practice. The arbitral tribunal rejected the counterparty’s claims for reinsurance compensation against our clients in full. The amount in dispute was approximately EUR 34 million.

byFounders.vc – DataCrunch’s USD 64 million Series A funding round

We supported byFounders.vc as the Finnish counsel in their investment in DataCrunch Oy in a USD 64 million Series A funding round. DataCrunch provides scalable AI compute solutions from energy-efficient data centers in Iceland and Finland. byFounders.vc is the community-powered early-stage venture fund investing in globally ambitious teams connected to the Nordic and Baltic countries.

Latest insights

2.10.2025 – Environment, Energy & Green Transition Fingrid extends restrictions on new energy storage facility connections in Southern Finland until 2029

Konsta Peussa

Marius af Schultén

Konsta Peussa & Marius af Schultén

12.9.2025 – Capital Markets & Public M&A Surely the preparation of interim reports does not need to be an insider project in the future?

Janne Lauha

Teresa Kauppila

Sakari Sedbom

Janne Lauha, Teresa Kauppila & Sakari Sedbom

9.9.2025 Launching C&S MBA Highlights Programme 9.7.2025 – FDI Regulatory Service Defence sector investments and acquisitions – key facts about the Finnish FDI regulation

Kiti Karvinen

Markus Rahnu

Kiti Karvinen & Markus Rahnu

Search from the site.