2.5.2018

What it Takes to Acquire a Committed Team, Not Just a Business in M&A

Talent, key employees, dream teams. There are no rows in the balance sheet for these assets.

A company’s books will tell you how many people it employs, but talent is not reflected in multiples or enterprise values. Despite the fact that retaining key personnel should be on the buyer’s mind, it is usually off the negotiation table when the terms of the deal are agreed. Purchase price adjustment mechanisms tied to retaining ‘dream teams’ remain rare.

The question then is how buyers can ensure that they get value for the money they invest when the business or company they are acquiring is dependent on certain key employees. This question should be at the top of mind of any buyer today, since acquisitions are increasingly less about acquiring tangible assets and more about acquiring the right people.

A share or business purchase agreement may include a condition precedent stipulating that the key employees must still be employed by the target on the closing date in order for the buyer to have an obligation to go ahead and complete the deal. But what happens after the deal is completed and the seller is gone?

As legal advisors we strive to guide our clients to find the right path to ensure the key personnel stay on board, and committed, also after the merger or acquisition.

Successful Integration Means Leading People through Change

We spend a lot of time on due diligence in order to identify risks. When it comes to the workforce, we tend to focus on historical and potential future liabilities involving direct costs. Once the investment is made, however, the most significant risk lies in successfully integrating and leading people through the change that a merger or acquisition inevitably entails.

In the due diligence review, we check that agreements with key employees contain sufficient non-compete and non-solicitation clauses preventing them from transferring to a competitor not only during their employment but also for some time thereafter. If they decide to leave, the agreement should prevent them from soliciting other colleagues and potential talent to leave with them.

We do the same to ensure that these people are bound by adequate confidentiality and IPR clauses, which provide protection against sensitive information leaking out and know-how and technology ending up in the wrong hands. This is all well and good, but is just the first box to tick.

Acquiring a Team, not just Business

A Transaction Bonus Alone Won’t Save the Day

In order to motivate key employees to put in all the extra work needed in a sales process, the seller may already have incentivised them by agreeing to pay a one-time cash bonus once the deal is signed. Transaction bonuses may, further, be agreed to become payable only if the key employees, either individually or as a team, remain employed with the target for a certain time after the deal is closed.

A transaction bonus can also be crafted as security against potential later dismissal by the new owner. If so, it becomes payable if the key employee is served notice before a certain date. Consequently, transaction bonuses are often paid by the seller.

At the end of the day however, no transaction bonus can provide much comfort to a buyer regarding the future. In fact, a very significant transaction bonus may have quite the opposite effect, in particular if the employee does not have sufficient clarity about the future.

Recognising Key Employees and Keeping Them On Board

Perhaps one of the key questions is whether we are paying enough attention to who the key employees really are. Key employees are often defined as the executive management. While they are certainly essential in most businesses, buyers should also be looking in less obvious places.

It is important to look for employees who have skills that could be decisive during the integration phase or crucial for delivering long-term targets. The back-office IT team may be irreplaceable, because they are the ones who will be responsible for the business-critical IT carve out that lies ahead after the merger.

Once you have truly identified your target’s key employees, you can consider how to incentivise them. It is generally worth looking at a mix of short- and long-term target-based bonus arrangements.

A traditional approach is to offer key employees equity. However, ownership is not for everyone. Some employees would still prefer to just collect a paycheck. A hybrid form, called virtual stock, could be a good alternative for these kind of employees. Virtual stock can provide the financial upside equity offers, though it lacks the other rights a shareholder would have, such as vote rights.

Interestingly enough, there are some surveys showing that there are a number of soft incentives that may be much more effective—and much cheaper—than money in retaining key people after the deal is closed.

The McKinsey study linked above describes a European industrial company that applied a mix of non-financial and financial incentives during a recent reorganisation. That company found that it required only 25% of the budget that had previously been spent on a broad, cash-based scheme.

What the McKinsey study indicates is that while money is an important factor in retention, it won’t do the trick alone.

Clear Future, Happy Staff

M&A veterans tend to focus on keeping talent. We recognise that employees stay when they are engaged, paid well, mentored, promoted regularly, respected and trusted. Ultimately, what employees want most of all is clarity about their future. This requires communication from the employer.

Praise from managers, attention from leaders, promotions, opportunities to lead projects and chances to join management or mentoring programmes do not cost much, but can be very effective motivators. Non-financial incentives take a bit more time, attention and care to put in place, though, which is perhaps why they are not always at the top of the list in the aftermath of a hectic deal.

Financial incentives can and should be used, but they need to be designed carefully. For example, it is essential to ensure that a substantial part of any incentive is paid only after the merger or acquisition and when certain performance targets have been met.

It may also be worthwhile for a buyer to stop for a minute and consider whether it is isolated individuals that need be retained or actually a groupof individuals that need be retained as a team. If the latter, the financial incentive can be tailored with criteria committing the whole team.

Finally, try to avoid last minute incentive arrangements, as they actually tend to dilute trust and appreciation than create genuine commitment. As always, timely communication is the key when dealing with people.

Latest references

We advised SRV Group plc when it sold its 50% holding in the Pearl Plaza shopping centre in St. Peterburg to CP Invest Limited. The sale was the final part of SRV’s actions to exit from all of its operations in Russia which began in 2022. The sales price of SRV´s ownership of the shopping centre was approximately 11 million euros. SRV is a Finnish developer and innovator in the construction industry. SRV was established in 1987 and is listed on the Helsinki Stock Exchange.
Case published 17.2.2025
We advised Valio Oy in its acquisition of Raisio Oyj’s plant protein business, related fixed assets and the Härkis® and Beanit® fava bean brands. The fixed assets include, among other things, the production equipment of the factory that makes plant protein products in Kauhava. The transaction supports Valio’s strategy to grow from a dairy company to a food company. This business acquisition will make us an even more significant developer and producer of plant-based protein products. The demand for these products will grow in the long term, and a great deal of growth potential still remains. In 2022, we acquired the Gold&Green® business and, since then, we have been carrying out strong product development and renewed the brand. Following successful product launches, sales in the last quarter of 2024 increased by about 50% from the previous quarter. With this acquisition, we are building our own production capacity. The production equipment of the Kauhava factory is just right for our needs and situation. says Kimmo Luoma, Valio’s Senior Vice President. Valio is a Finnish dairy and food company founded in 1905 and owned by Finnish dairy cooperatives. Valio has subsidiaries in Sweden, Estonia, the United States and China. In 2023, the Group had a turnover of EUR 2 278 million and more than 4 000 employees.
Case published 14.2.2025
We advised Sanok Rubber Company S.A. in connection with a transaction where the Polish International Development Fund 2 FIZ AN acquired 30% of the shares in Teknikum Group Ltd from Sanok Rubber Company S.A. Teknikum Group is a European polymer technology company serving industrial customers in need of reliable rubber, plastic, silicone, polyurethane, and foam solutions. The group has approximately 600 employees and operates four production plants in Finland and one in Hungary, and a sales office in Germany. Sanok Rubber Company S.A. is the European leader in the field of rubber products, rubber-to-metal articles and combination of rubber with other materials for the automotive, construction, agriculture, pharmacy and household appliances. Sanok Rubber Company S.A. is listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange and employs more than 3,000 people in Europe and North America. Polish International Development Fund 2 FIZ AN is one of two specialised foreign expansion funds managed by PFR TFI. The fund’s aim is to co-finance foreign investments of Polish companies. We advised Sanok Rubber Company S.A. together with the Polish law firm Rymarz Zdort Maruta.
Case published 3.2.2025
Castrén & Snellman is acting as the legal advisor to the City of Pori in its sale of a 49% stake in Pori Energia to Polhem Infra. Pori Energia, a multi-utility company, operates in various sectors including district heating, electricity distribution, and electricity generation through CHP and renewable sources. The company also provides wind power services and industrial energy solutions in the Satakunta region. This strategic partnership between the City of Pori and Polhem Infra aims to enhance Pori Energia’s financial stability and investment capabilities, enabling the company to further its efforts in the energy transition and continue delivering high-quality energy services to its customers. Polhem Infra, owned by Swedish state pension funds, focuses on investments in critical infrastructure, including renewable electricity generation, energy storage, energy distribution, digital infrastructure, and transport infrastructure. The transaction values Pori Energia at EUR 905 million. 
Case published 31.1.2025