5.3.2024

The trend of global carve-out transactions remains active

In a constantly evolving business landscape characterised by market fluctuations, carve-out transactions stand out as a compelling alternative for entities looking to streamline their operations and focus on and allocate resources to core business activities. 

We have witnessed a significant increase in complex multi-jurisdictional carve-outs in recent years, and the trend of strategic reviews and divestment of non-core assets seems to continue also in the current market.

Carve-out transactions involve the separation of a business unit or division from its parent entity, often resulting in the creation of a standalone entity distinct from its parent entity or the integration of the divested business directly into another organisation. As complex legal undertakings, carve-out transactions require careful planning, structured project management and a deep understanding of the underlying legal questions.

We have compiled below some of the key legal considerations that should be taken into account when planning and implementing a carve-out transaction in multiple jurisdictions.

Identifying the business to be separated

Separating a business unit or division requires identifying which assets, employees, commercial agreements, intellectual property rights, and premises belong to the business to be separated and are to be transferred with it. Each category of assets and agreements requires thorough legal analysis as regards transferability.

It is common that the business to be separated and the parent entity have shared assets that both entities are using. This often leads to detailed considerations regarding separation issues, such as the renegotiation of shared agreements, employee and union negotiations, and the negotiation of licensing arrangements with respect to shared intellectual property rights.

Structuring the separation

Structuring is an important first step of the planning phase whereby different structural alternatives for the transaction are analysed and ultimately decided on. These include cost and timeline aspects, regulatory requirements, and the overall complexity of implementing the final structure, among other things.

Need for transitional services and negotiating a transitional services agreement

The business to be separated is typically dependent on certain services provided by the parent entity and may require transitional services for a specific period after the completion of the carve-out. Identifying the services that can be offered after the consummation of the transaction is critical, and the detailed terms for offering such services are captured in a transitional services agreement. It is key to carefully consider the underlying service and supply agreements when scoping out the terms and conditions for the transitional services.

Regulatory framework and potential approvals from third parties

The need for any approvals under foreign direct investment regimes and the filing of merger control notifications should be assessed early on in the process, as these aspects may have a significant impact on the overall timeline.

Depending on the line of business of the company, industry-specific approvals from or notifications to local authorities in different jurisdictions may also be required to validly consummate the transaction. The transfer of employees may also trigger the obligation to carry out cooperation negotiations or to inform or consult with employee representatives or unions.

If the business to be separated requires permits or licenses for its operations, the possibility to assign these in connection with the carve-out should be assessed. The same applies to any required actions for such permits or licenses to remain in force after the completion of the transaction.

Carve-out transactions typically include the assignment of agreements from one entity to another which, as a main rule, requires the counterparty’s consent. In large transactions, the identification of the most material counterparties and the careful planning of the process to obtain consent play a key role in mitigating the risk that key agreements would be terminated by the counterparty.

Drafting and negotiating transaction documents

Understanding the interrelation between different transaction documents and how they are linked together as well as ensuring alignment across these documents is crucial for a successful carve-out transaction. In addition to the main transaction agreement, local share or asset transfer agreements and transitional services agreements are typically required. Licensing agreements, service agreements, new employment agreements or other ancillary agreements may also need to be prepared.

C&S track record in cross-border carve-out transactions

We have extensive experience in advising clients throughout the entire lifecycle of a carve-out project, and we have been involved in some of the largest and most prominent carve-out transactions in the Finnish market. Our team’s solution-oriented approach provides tailored legal solutions to guide clients through all the legal aspects of cross-border carve-out transactions, ensuring seamless execution and achieving the best possible outcome to the client. We frequently provide advice on both sell and buy-side carve-out transactions. Our team of legal experts has valuable insights in cooperating with legal advisors from multiple jurisdictions to combine legal knowledge into the best possible practical solutions for our clients.

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Topfoods Oy, a Triton-backed Geia Group company, on its acquisition of Oy Delice Plus Ab, a Finnish supplier of cakes and pastries. Through the acquisition, Topfoods strengthens its retail business and further reinforces its position in the cakes and pastries segment. Founded in 2008, Topfoods supplies selected food products to professional kitchens, the retail sector, and the food industry. 
Case published 4.9.2026
We advised HANZA on the divestment of its Nivala and Sievi operations. The transaction was part of HANZA’s larger strategic reorganisation, where the company optimised its Finnish manufacturing cluster. Founded in 2008, HANZA is a Swedish mechanical engineering and electronics contract manufacturing company listed on the Nasdaq Stockholm main list. HANZA has approximately 5,000 employees and annual sales of SEK 10 billion. 
Case published 3.9.2026