5.2.2024

The Government wants to increase companies’ interest in public procurement by strengthening competition

Related services

There are still difficult times ahead for the state’s finances, and the need to cut expenditure is growing. One of the ways in which the Government will try to achieve savings in the coming years is making public procurement more effective. According to Johanna Lähde, the key to well-functioning public procurement is skilled management of procurements and active dialogue with market players.

‘In financially challenging times, procurements become increasingly significant, as the use of public funds is considered carefully and, at the same time, it is difficult for many companies to increase their business. The Government aims to make public procurement more effective and strengthen the attractiveness during this term, among other things, by regulative amendments,’ says Johanna Lähde, head of C&S’s Procurement service.

The objective of public procurement has always been to provide companies with equal opportunities to participate in the public procurement procedure. According to a comprehensive review by the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority published in December, the competitive situation in public procurement is, however, poor: on average only two tenders are submitted in competitive tender processes. A significant number of competitive tender processes, 14.5%, only receive one tender. The Government is therefore planning to reform the Act on Public Contracts during this term in such a way that the tender process would have to be renewed if only one tender has been submitted.

‘The small number of tenders is alarming. Low competition does not promote cost-efficient use of tax money. There are a lot of expectations for public procurement as the aim with procurements is to promote various sustainability and responsibility goals and innovations, for example. If public procurement does not interest companies, it is clear that the practical impact of procurements cannot be optimal. Increasing competition benefits both parties because it gives the procurer more choice and companies a realistic opportunity to succeed in competition’, says Johanna.

Market dialogue is an integral part of procurement process

Due to legislation, it is characteristic of public procurement that the requirements of procurement are defined well in advance. It is difficult to change the requirements afterwards without starting the project from the beginning. Companies can also not market alternative solutions successfully while the competitive tender process is ongoing. According to Lähde, the key to successful and effective procurement lies in management and market understanding. 

‘A good procurement process is made up of several different factors. I want to encourage procurers to have an active dialogue with the market players. It is a good idea to discuss with companies already at an early stage of the procurement process. Well-functioning interaction plays a key role in getting the contracting entities and companies on the same page with respect to the market and the service to be offered.’

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy. 
Case published 9.9.2026