At the end of the year, we wrote about amendments to the Consumer Protection Act arising from the EU’s Sale of Goods Directive (2019/771). In addition to transposing of the Sale of Goods Directive, the Consumer Protection Act has now been also been updated for the digital age by transposing the Digital Content and Digital Services Directive (2019/770) (also called the Digital Contracts Directive). These amendments entered into force on 1 January 2022.
20.1.2022
Consumer Protection Enters the Digital Age: Digital Content and Services Now Expressly Regulated
Hilma-Karoliina Rozell & Piia Raappana
Digital Content and Services Now Expressly Accounted for in Consumer Protection Act
The Consumer Protection Act now includes a new Chapter 5a, which includes specific provisions concerning digital content and services. The Consumer Protection Act previously did not expressly regulate digital content and services. In the future, Chapter 5a will include provisions on, among other things, delivering digital content and services, defects in digital content and services and the consequences of such defects, as well as on modification of digital content or services.
Digital content means, for example, computer programs, digital games and electronic books. Digital services mean, for example, cloud services and services such as social media.
It is worth noting that the new Chapter 5a applies not only to the contracts by which consumers commit to pay for digital content or services, but with certain limitations also to contracts by which consumers commit to provide personal data to traders.
Here are some of the key amendments:
New Provisions Seek to Clarify Legal State
Like the Sale of Goods Directive, the new provisions of the Digital Contracts Directive are intended to facilitate the offering and availability of content and services in the EU between Member States. Adding express provisions concerning digital content and services to the Consumer Protection Act also helps clarify the legal state, even though the Consumer Protection Act was already analogically applied to digital content and services as appropriate.
The most significant amendments are definitely the application of the new Chapter 5a to contracts by which consumers provide or commit to provide their personal data in exchange for digital content or services. Previously, the Consumer Protection Act’s provisions on delays and defects were not even analogically applied to such contracts.
Latest news
Latest references
Efima – Sale of AI business
We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere.
Case published 21.9.2026
Neoen – Sale of data centre
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
Jolt Capital and Tesi – Investment in VEV
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR Group – Intellectual property matters
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy.
Case published 9.9.2026