15.12.2021

Towards a Digital Single Market: Amendments to Consumer Protection Act in 2022

The Consumer Protection Act is set to see many amendments in the coming year. Some of the amendments are due to the national transposition of the EU’s Sale of Goods Directive (2019/771). Amendments are also being made to the Consumer Protection Act due to the Digital Content Directive (2019/770). These two directives are based on the EU’s Digital Single Market Strategy. One of the main goals of the strategy is to give consumers and businesses better access to online goods and services in Europe.

A government proposal (HE 180/2021) for amendments to the Consumer Protection Act was given to Parliament in October 2021. The amendments are scheduled to enter into force on 1 January 2022. This bulletin looks at the amendments arising from the Sale of Goods Directive.

From Sale of Consumer Goods to Sale of Goods

The transposition of the Sale of Goods Directive requires amendments to chapter 5 of the Consumer Protection Act with respect to the sale of consumers goods, particularly to the provisions concerning the characteristics and defects of goods as well as the sanctions for defects. At the same time the title of the chapter will be changed from ‘Sale of consumer goods’ to ‘Sale of goods’.

As things currently stand, the main reforms to the sale of goods will be the following:

Position of Consumers Strengthened, More Care Required of Companies

The reforms have been presented as improving the ability of companies to sell and consumers to buy goods across borders between EU and EEA countries. However, the positive impacts on cross-border trade are undermined by the fact that both directives ultimately allow a great deal of latitude on the national level, and only some of the provisions are harmonised.

In the sale of goods, the position of consumers in relation to seller companies will improve, at least to some extent, and companies may correspondingly be held responsible for defective goods more often. The more uniform sale of goods provisions that have been proposed will be particularly significant to companies engaging in e-commerce. In particular, the new provisions concerning the sale of goods with digital elements will require companies to exercise care.

It would be wise for companies to start reviewing their terms and conditions and guarantee terms in light of the new legislation if they have not already done so. For instance, the longer defect assumption period means that companies will no longer be able to offer consumers one-year guarantees as such, because a guarantee must provide genuine added value to consumers.

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy. 
Case published 9.9.2026