Sustainability and combating climate change are the constant subject of attention in both regulation and practice. However, the regulation reform and amendments are raising emotional responses and arousing discussion in the construction industry. A milestone of sorts will be reached during this autumn as the Finnish Government submitted to Parliament bills for a new act on construction as well as an amendment to the Land Use and Building Act which would repeal the current sections on construction and add new provisions on the digitalisation of land use data. The acts are scheduled to enter into force on 1 January 2024.
22.9.2022
Merely fulfilling the minimum requirements is not enough in sustainable construction
Related services
New regulation to set requirements for sustainable construction
The reformation of the Land Use and Building Act planned earlier received a lot of feedback when it was circulated for comments. According to the release by the Ministry of the Environment, “the comments were mostly positive about the proposals for promoting low-carbon construction, circular economy and digitalisation”, and these proposals are still included in the reform. However, for example the mandatory liability periods which we criticised earlier in our blog have been removed.
Regulation on the EU-level will also be reformed due to the Fit for 55 legislative package and the REPowerEU plan, among other things. Amendments are planned to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the Renewable Energy Directive (RED II), for example. These amendments would result in changes to the requirements for the heating and cooling of buildings and the share of renewable energy used in buildings.
Clearly, the new regulation is meant to promote sustainable construction. However, from the perspective of 2024, the regulation may not present a particularly ambitious level of sustainable construction. In this respect, it will be hopelessly lagging, even though it aims to promote important sustainability goals.
The interesting question is how sustainable construction should be approached in the different stages and roles of a construction project now and in the future.
Is it enough to fulfil the requirements of the current or the new regulation?
Various environmental categories and calculations are a basic requirement in construction and its financing. Construction that is currently underway or beginning does not need to fulfil the requirements of the new regulation, since the regulation will only enter into force in 2024 as things currently stand. However, a responsible actor takes the requirements into account in the present day.
Projects with ambitious requirements will stand out favourably in the construction industry. In sustainable projects, there is a will to pay more than the minimum in order to reach new goals that are more stringent than before. If sufficiently high goals are not set for a construction project, there will be no new development in sustainable construction.
Fulfilling the minimum requirements is not enough in legal advice either
Merely fulfilling the minimum requirements of legislation is not sufficient in the future with respect to the green transition and circular economy and thus to sustainability, even though legislation is furthering matters along the right lines. In the future, construction must be able to implement new solutions that are more sustainable and more effective in combating climate change. The same applies to lawyers along with other advisors – we must increase our technical understanding of the construction projects that are the objects of agreements and be able to offer contractual provisions that take environmental and sustainability perspectives into account.
Responsible and sustainable development should be promoted in all areas from advice to implementation and operation while not forgetting to account for the reuse of construction products.
Latest insights
Article published 15.5.2025
Latest regulatory developments for renewable energy in Finland
Article published 9.4.2025 – Dispute Resolution
New European Court of Justice ruling C-537/23 sheds light on the interpretation and validity of asymmetric jurisdiction clauses – Implications for European businesses
Article published 7.4.2025 – Private Equity & Venture Capital
Tax credit for major clean transition investments passed in Parliament – application period until 29 August 2025
Article published 25.3.2025 – Mergers & Acquisitions
How to successfully run a large-scale cross-border M&A project?
Marius af Schultén & Konsta Peussa
Robin Ollus & Tuomas Lehtinen
Janne Juusela, Mikko Alakare, Samuli Tarkiainen, Marius af Schultén, Jarno Tanhuanpää, Kanerva Sunila & Noora Ahonen
Carola Lindholm & Samuli Tarkiainen
Latest references
eQ Community Properties Fund – Sale of two healthcare properties
We assisted eQ Community Properties Fund in the sale of two healthcare properties to a fund managed by Northern Horizon. The properties have a total floor area of approximately 3,500 square meters. The two properties are located in Espoo and Lahti. The Espoo asset was completed in 2018 and the Lahti asset was completed in 2023. Both assets are operated by Attendo, the leading care provider in the Nordic region.
Case published 9.5.2025
BMW AG – Enforcement of BMW’s trademark and design rights
We successfully represented BMW in an exceptionally long dispute over whether the spare rims sold by the defendant and the hub caps included in them infringed BMW’s trademark and design rights. The Market Court found that the sign used by the defendant caused a likelihood of confusion with BMW’s trademarks. The defendant had used the sign on the hub caps and in the marketing of the hub caps and rims, leading the Market Court to find that the defendant had infringed BMW’s trademark rights. The defendant admitted to infringing BMW’s Community design but denied the related injunction claim. However, the Market Court found that there was no particular reason to refrain from issuing an injunction. The Market Court prohibited the defendant from continuing to infringe BMW’s trademarks and Community design and ordered the defendant to alter or destroy the products and marketing materials that infringed BMW’s rights. Furthermore, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay BMW EUR 70,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 80,000 in damages for the trademark infringements, as well as EUR 7,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 8,000 in damages for the design right infringement. The amounts can be considered exceptionally high in Finland. Additionally, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay a significant portion of BMW’s legal costs with interest on late payment. In its decision of 11 March 2025, the Supreme Court of Finland did not grant the defendant leave to appeal, and also decided that there was no need to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union. Thus, the Market Court’s judgements (MAO:494/18 ja 517/2023) are final. In addition to the main dispute, BMW demanded in a separate proceeding that one of the defendant’s trademark registrations be revoked. A total of three separate legal proceedings were conducted in the Market Court regarding the revocation. The defendant’s trademark registration was ultimately revoked.
Case published 9.5.2025
DNA – Global brand portfolio management and IP enforcement
We are advising DNA Plc in brand protection and intellectual property enforcement matters globally. Our intellectual property team manages DNA’s global trademark portfolio, including registration, prosecution, opposition and enforcement. We also advise DNA in questions concerning consumer and marketing law, unfair competition, social media, domain names and cybersquatting. DNA Plc is one of Finland’s leading telecommunication companies. DNA offers connections, services and devices for homes and workplaces, contributing to the digitalisation of society. The company has approximately 3.7 million subscriptions in its fixed and mobile communications networks. In 2024, DNA’s total revenue was EUR 1,100 million, and the company employs about 1,600 people around Finland. DNA is part of Telenor Group.
Case published 7.5.2025
Foodiq – Restructuring proceedings
Castrén & Snellman’s Attorney Christer Svartström acted as the administrator in the restructuring proceedings of Foodiq Oy, which began on 11 March 2024. Foodiq is a unique future food focused company that develops and produces plant and milk-based products for both the private and public sectors. The company’s largest shareholder is a Swedish investment company focusing on FoodTec, Nicoya AB. The majority of creditors approved the draft restructuring programme in expedited proceedings after restructuring proceedings that lasted just under a year. The District Court of Helsinki affirmed the restructuring programme including the one-day payment programme on 10 March 2025 and appointed Attorney Christer Svartström as the supervisor of the programme. In cooperation with the parties, they found an effective and quick restructuring solution for the company, avoiding a long-term programme and allowing the company to focus on its core business. The restructuring programme was financed by investments made by the company’s investors. At the same time, the one-day programme provided a better outcome for creditors compared to a longer programme. The implementation of the restructuring programme ended successfully on 28 March 2025.
Case published 6.5.2025