Legal technology is a red-hot market where new solutions are constantly emerging, putting pressure on law firms to put them into practice. Since legal tasks have traditionally included routine tasks and static working methods, many believe that early adopters of legal technology will have a significant edge over their competitors. However, the media often oversimplifies the implementation process of legal technology, giving the impression that innovative IT-based solutions immediately eliminate routine tasks and even replace legal expertise.
19.8.2019
Legal Technology Improves Efficiency – But Not by Itself
Paula Aura
Related services
These expectations usually lead to firms not spending enough effort on integrating legal tech tools into their existing processes. As a result, lawyers often find their traditional working methods preferable and stick to them.
Dumping money into the latest tools and expecting them to do the job right away is hardly a recipe for success. Instead, the firms that manage to effectively incorporate new solutions into their existing processes will have a huge advantage in the future.
Properly Trained AI Allows Lawyers to Focus on the Essential
AI can enable law firms to work at less cost and higher quality, but only if the technology is implemented efficiently into existing workflows. Most legal problems are complex and involve hidden risks that require comprehensive legal expertise to detect. Machine-learning algorithms have no legal expertise — they only observe patterns and regularities in data. Therefore, lawyers need to work alongside AI and develop these tools continuously, rather than relying on them straight out of the box.
For instance, before algorithms can detect relevant information and raise red flags in due diligence reviews, lawyers have to identify the relevant information and train the algorithm to detect this information. When algorithms are given enough examples of red flags – say, certain types of contractual clauses – they start flagging such information automatically in future reviews. Lawyers no longer have to spend time finding the information in the due diligence materials, but can focus on how the clauses detected by the AI tool affect the transaction.
Document Automation Saves Time and Helps Avoid Errors
As most businesses, legal services involve manual tasks that can be removed or at least reduced by technology. For instance, when drafting documents, lawyers may spend hours modifying old templates and writing new contracts from scratch. Automating contract-drafting takes care of these steps, allowing lawyers to spend more time on analytical tasks.
In document automation, various versions of a given document type – for instance, a share purchase agreement – are stored in a system, enabling the lawyers to create the template they need just by combining different choices in a user interface. Based on the choices, the system generates a valid contract including all the required elements. For instance, the automated share purchase agreement might contain different options for price mechanisms, provisions and other key clauses, and be available in several languages.
Automation not only improves efficiency, but also minimises the risk of human error when contracts need to be delivered on a tight schedule. However, it serves this purpose only when any contract version acquired from the system is legally accurate. Both legal and technical issues must be taken into account, which requires cooperation between people with different skillsets.
At Castrén & Snellman, document automation is based on close collaboration between our lawyers, IT department and Knowledge Management. Moreover, our firm employs people with diverse backgrounds, for example in both law and computer science, who focus mainly on legal tech, such as document automation and training algorithms.
Meet Signe, the Accessible Legal Tech Solution
After putting hours of legal and technical work in automating our document templates, we wanted to bring high-quality document automation within the reach of our clients. This is why we launched Signe.
Signe is a platform where clients can log in and use their own automated contracts and documents through a simple user interface. It offers a way for in-house teams to adopt legal technology quickly without having to make large investments or spend resources on implementing new software.
When approached realistically and strategically, legal technology goes from being pure hype to a tool enabling law firms to provide legal services faster, more effectively and at less cost.
Written by Linda Björkenheim,
Legal Tech Trainee
Latest insights
Article published 10.10.2024 – Data & Technology
New act on dual-use items entered into force in September – what companies need to know
Article published 5.9.2024 – Data & Technology
Technology acquisitions can boost companies’ growth – or cause them to fail
Article published 6.5.2024 – Employment
Outsourcing company functions – four key points for success
Article published 7.12.2023 – Data & Technology
Agreements define data sharing and re-use
Kim Parviainen, Lauri Laatunen & Joakim Jaulimo
Topi Lusenius, Anders Forss & Kim Parviainen
Tomi Kemppainen, Kim Parviainen & Eija Warma-Lehtinen
Latest references
Finnish Motor Insurers’ Centre – Precedent concerning patient data processing and repeal of administrative fine
The Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) issued a significant precedent (decision KHO:2025:23) in a case in which it found that the Finnish Motor Insurers’ Centre (Liikennevakuutuskeskus, LVK) processed patient data in accordance with the requirements concerning fairness, data minimisation, and privacy by design and by default when deciding on compensation claims. We represented LVK in this case in which the SAC upheld the Administrative Court’s decision to repeal the EUR 52,000 administrative fine imposed on LVK by the Sanctions Board of the Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman. The SAC also confirmed the Administrative Court’s decision, which, as far as we know, was the first of its kind in Finland, ordering the Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman to reimburse some of our client’s legal costs. The decision bears great significance for the insurance industry as a whole. The crux of the matter were LVK’s information requests under the Motor Liability Insurance Act for patient data that were essential in determining insurance or compensation claims. In certain cases, making a decision may require extensive patient data. The Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman had found that LVK had systematically made overly broad information requests infringing Articles 5 and 25 of the GDPR and that the information should have been provided in the form of separate medical opinions. The Administrative Court repealed the Data Protection Ombudsman’s decision and found that patient records from medical appointments are, as a general rule, essential in establishing causality in compensation matters. It also stated that the tasks related to the consideration of compensation matters are specifically the core tasks of the insurance company and not of the controller of patient data. Furthermore, the Administrative Court found no evidence indicating that LVK would have systematically made overly broad information requests. ‘Once again, our collaboration with C&S was seamless throughout this extensive process, and we could trust that our case was in expert hands’, says Visa Kronbäck, Chief Legal Officer of the Insurance Centre. The full decision is available on the SAC website (in Finnish): KHO:2025:23.
Case published 18.6.2025
Ilkka Paananen Foundation – Legal assessment of a chatbot system using generative AI
We advised the Ilkka Paananen Foundation on a legal review relating to the use of a chatbot system utilising generative artificial intelligence. The AI system provides conversational support to young people experiencing mental health issues and various life crises. Our advice covered the AI Act, which regulates advanced AI systems, as well as data protection and other relevant local legislation.
Case published 16.6.2025
Pihlajalinna – Sale of special housing services
We advised Pihlajalinna Plc on an arrangement whereby Pihlajalinna Terveys Oy and Ikipihlaja Setälänpiha Oy sold their special housing services business to Esperi Care Oy. The transaction involved three Pihlajalinna Uniikki units in Hämeenlinna, Lohja and Riihimäki as well as Ikipihlaja Oiva in Raisio. As a result of the arrangement, more than 100 employees transferred to Esperi. Pihlajalinna is one of Finland’s leading private providers of social and healthcare services, offering a wide range of services to both private and public sector clients. Pihlajalinna has more than 160 locations across Finland.
Case published 2.6.2025
PwC – Public tender in Kela’s Eepos procurement process
We are proud to have provided legal assistance to PwC in the successful public tendering process for the comprehensive renewal of Kela’s benefits processing systems. Kela is the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, and this project is a significant cornerstone in modernising Finland’s social security infrastructure. PwC was selected as Kela’s strategic partner to implement a comprehensive overhaul of the benefits processing systems, digital services, customer relationship management, and information exchange platforms. The project aims to meet the demands of the future digital environment and enhance customer experience through the adoption of Salesforce technology. The new systems are expected to simplify benefit processes, enhance user experience for both customers, employees and other stakeholders, and ensure adaptability to future legislative changes. Castrén & Snellman provided strategic legal support to PwC throughout its successful bidding process, which was carried out through a competitive negotiated procedure. We extend our warmest congratulations to PwC for their successful bid and look forward to seeing the positive impact of this project on Finland’s social security system.
Case published 24.4.2025