14.5.2020

Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority’s Powers Expanded – National Implementation of ECN+ Directive Moves Forward

The new European ECN+ directive entered into force at the beginning of last year. The goal of the directive is to strengthen and unify the powers of national competition authorities.

In Finland, some of the requirements of the ECN+ directive were already incorporated into the new Competition Act, which entered into force on 17 June 2019. The Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment set a committee to complete the implementation of the directive.

At the end of April, the committee published its report in which the committee proposes amendments to several of the Competition Act’s provisions as well as the addition of new provisions. The most significant amendments proposed relate to fines, structural remedies and closer cooperation among national competition authorities.

Amendments to Imposition of Fines

The committee proposed that the Competition Act be amended so that the FCCA could in future also propose fines and periodic penalty payments for procedural violations, such as, breaking a seal during an authority inspection.

According to the proposal, a procedural violation could lead to a maximum fine of one per cent of the global turnover of the company that committed the violation.

The ECN+ directive does not obligate Member States to review their fining policy with respect to fines imposed due to competition restrictions. In Finland, however, the committee was given the opportunity to also assess the predictability of the level of fines. The committee proposed adding more detailed provisions to the Competition Act concerning the assessment of the level of fines.

According to the proposal, the standard that the FCCA would use to assess the level of a fine for a competition restriction would, for the most part, correspond to the Commission’s fining guidelines. The standard would not, however be binding on the courts, which would maintain discretion in determining the amount of a fine.

Trade associations and their members need to take particular note that the ECN+ directive has significantly increased the severity of the consequences they face, as fines will in future be determined on the basis of the aggregate turnover of their member companies, and their members will ultimately be liable to pay the fines. Read more about the impact of the ECN+ directive on trade associations.

New Structural Remedies to Intervene in Competition Restrictions

In addition to amendments to fines, the committee report also includes a proposal for using structural remedies to end a competition restriction. Structural remedies mean, for example, imposing an obligation to divest an ownership stake in a competitor or dispose of a business unit.

The purpose of structural remedies is to maintain or reinstate competitive circumstances on a market. The report recognises that structural remedies are heavy and often irreversible, and as a result proposes that they could only be put into effect after a decision has become final.

Closer Cooperation between Competition Authorities

The committee report also proposes provisions that would enable closer cooperation between national competition authorities in the EU. The report proposes, for example, that an entirely new chapter be added to the Competition Act to ensure the notification of documents and the enforcement of sanctions on behalf of other national competition authorities across Members State borders.

Minority Opinions on Fines, Inspections and Interim Measures

Two minority opinions were published concerning the report. The Finnish Bar Association’s minority opinion criticises the provisions concerning fines for procedural violations as well as the standard for determining fines for competition restrictions. It also highlighted insufficient court oversight of FCCA inspections.

The Confederation of Finnish Industries and Suomen Yrittäjät submitted a joint minority opinion, which criticises, among other things, the fines imposed on associations of undertakings and the regulation of interim measures and also highlighted the need for effective advance competition advice.

Progress of Drafting

The national implementation of the directive must be completed by 4 February 2021. The goal of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment is to publish the government bill concerning the amendments during mid-September. Stakeholder groups will have the opportunity to give statements on the bill before then.

 

Sari Hiltunen, Hanna Perikangas and Joona Havunen

Latest references

We are acting as the lead counsel to Fortum in a cross-border transaction in which Fortum is selling its recycling and waste business. The business is sold to thematic impact investing firm Summa Equity through its portfolio company NG Group. The debt-free purchase price is approximately EUR 800 million. The transaction is subject to authority approval and customary closing conditions. Fortum’s recycling and waste business to be sold comprises municipal and industrial waste management and end-to-end plastics, metals, ash, slag and hazardous waste treatment and recycling services. These businesses are located in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway and currently employ approximately 900 employees.
Case published 18.7.2024
We advised Andritz Oy, a part of ANDRITZ group, with their acquisition of all the shares in Procemex Oy. The acquisition further strengthens ANDRITZ’s automation and digitalisation portfolio. Procemex is a global leader in integrated web monitoring and web inspection solutions for the pulp and paper industry. It has a team of more than 100 vision systems experts and has subsidiaries in Germany, Japan and the US. ANDRITZ offers a broad portfolio of innovative plants, equipment, systems, services and digital solutions for a wide range of industries and end markets. ANDRITZ is a global market leader in all four of its business areas – Pulp & Paper, Metals, Hydropower and Environment & Energy. The publicly listed group has around 30,000 employees and over 280 locations in more than 80 countries.
Case published 18.7.2024
We acted as the legal advisor to OP Finland Infrastructure LP in its investment in Cactos Fleet Finland Ky. Cactos Fleet Finland invests in smart electricity storage systems in Finland. OP Finland Infrastructure is a fund investing in Finnish infrastructure. The fund is managed by OP Financial Group. Cactos Fleet Finland primarily invests in electricity storage systems installed in real estate properties. In addition to their grid-related tasks, these systems can level out peaks in the property’s electricity consumption and provide back-up power. 
Case published 29.4.2024
We acted as legal advisor to OP Finland Infrastructure LP in its investment in ESL Shipping Ltd, a Finnish shipping company. Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company co-invested in the company. The investment was made against new shares in ESL Shipping, and  the EUR 45 million co-investment  corresponds to a  21.43 % holding in the company. The aim of the investment is to accelerate ESL Shipping’s green transition. ESL Shipping Ltd is a Finnish shipping company. Its main shareholder is Aspo Plc. OP Finland Infrastructure is a fund investing in Finnish infrastructure. The fund is managed by OP Financial Group. Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company is a Finnish pension insurance company. In September 2023 the value of its investment portfolio amounted to EUR 57.5 billion. 
Case published 26.4.2024