15.8.2019

Competition Rules for Trade Associations to Become Stricter – Are You Aware of the Association Memberships in Your Company?

Trade associations have an important role in business life and the whole society. They do valuable work to influence, inter alia, legislation and authority regulations. Nevertheless, one has to remember that discussion topics are restricted when meeting with competitors. Competition law restricts considerably the matters that can be agreed or even discussed together.

Taking competition law into consideration will become increasingly important in the future. Competition law concerning trade associations and their member companies will become stricter, as the ECN+ Directive, which entered into force at the beginning of this year, increases responsibilities and toughens sanctions. Companies must be aware of the associations in which their employees are involved and ensure that they know how to act right. In addition, companies must ensure that competition rules are complied with in all activity of trade associations.

The ECN+ Directive Leads to Stricter Consequences

The European Union enhances the powers of national competition authorities with the ECN+ Directive, which entered into force at the beginning of this year. The Member States must implement the Directive on 4 February 2021 at the latest. The Directive will harmonise the powers of competition authorities in, among other things, the investigation of competition restrictions and the imposition of sanctions.

Finland has prepared for this change in the Government Programme: Competition and consumer authorities will be given more powers and resources, and the sanctions available to them will be increased. The Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland will establish a committee to make amendments to the Competition Act.

Consequences for breaches will become more severe in two ways:

The euro amounts of the fines and the risks of the member companies may increase hugely. A simple example illustrates this.

The turnover of a trade association is EUR 2 million, and it consists mainly of membership fees and extraordinary income. The association has 20 members the accumulated turnover of which is EUR 500 million. The board members are representatives from four different companies one of which is an international listed company and three others are small and medium-sized enterprises.

The managing director of the trade association drafts a notice that states that salaries and energy costs will increase in the autumn and advises actors in the field to adjust their pricing in order to ensure their profitability. This constitutes a forbidden price recommendation and the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority proposes to the Market Court that an appropriate penalty payment be imposed on the association. Pursuant to the current Competition Act, the penalty payment imposed on the association can be no higher than EUR 200,000. As a result of the reform, the penalty payment can be as much as EUR 50 million. The risk that the listed company ends up paying the fine is apparent.

The change gives rise to challenges particularly in associations where the members  are variable in terms of its size and competition law expertise. In some cases, a company is considered to be involved in a competition infringement solely on the grounds that it has been informed of a decision restricting the competition of another organ of the association, and it has not publicly distanced itself from the decision. Companies’ requirement to act diligently will become stricter to an entirely new level, as each member must ensure that all the organs of the association comply with law, irrespective of whether the representatives of the company belongs to them or not.

Awareness of the Association Memberships Reduces Risks

Latest references

We advised Nomios, a portfolio company of the European growth buyout investor Keensight Capital, with its cross-border acquisition of Intragen Group, a leading European expert in digital identity and access management. The acquisition marks a major milestone in Nomios’ growth strategy and further strengthens its position as the global trusted partner for cybersecurity across Europe. Nomios is one of Europe’s leading providers of cybersecurity services. Keensight Capital is a European growth buyout investor with deep expertise in technology and healthcare.  
Case published 17.11.2025
Castrén & Snellman was commissioned by the Ministry of the Environment to carry out a study on how the Circular Economy Act could be used to promote circular economy aspects in public procurement. Our report provides valuable information to the working group tasked with preparing the new Circular Economy Act. The report includes an overview of relevant strategies, action programmes and policies, a look at relevant legislation and case law, an assessment of the current state of circular economy procurement and examples of integrating circular economy aspects into public procurement from around the world. We end the report with concrete conclusions and a proposal for a new circular economy provision with justification. The proposal aims to maximise the regulation’s effectiveness and minimise any adverse side effects. The final report is available on the Circular Economy Act project’s Gateway to Information (in Finnish). The study was carried out by Anna Kuusniemi-Laine, Sanna Aalto-Setälä, Lotta Huhtamäki, Marja Ollila, Laura Vuorinen, Paavo Heinonen and Anna Ylitalo.
Case published 11.11.2025
We are acting as legal adviser to Stena Line on its acquisition of NLC Ferry Ab Oy (Wasaline), strengthening Stena Line’s position in the Baltic Sea and enabling it to take over operations of the ferry route between Umeå in Sweden and Vaasa in Finland. The acquisition further strengthens Stena Line’s position as one of the leaders in sustainability within the ferry industry and enhances the company’s access to alternative fuels whilst providing a strong intermodal transport link towards Gothenburg and Trelleborg, and onwards to the European continent. NLC Ferry, operating under the auxiliary name Wasaline, were owned by Kvarken Link, a company jointly owned 50/50 by the cities of Umeå and Vaasa. Wasaline is the world’s northernmost shipping company, operating daily passenger and freight services between Vaasa, Finland and Umeå, Sweden, and is the first carbon-neutral ferry operator in the Baltic Sea with its hybrid vessel, Aurora Botnia, which runs on biogas and batteries. Stena Line is one of Europe’s leading ferry operators, with 20 routes across the continent. The company is family-owned, was founded in 1962 and is headquartered in Gothenburg, with 6,550 employees and an annual turnover of 19.6 billion SEK. The transaction is conditional to the approval of the respective municipal councils of Umeå and Vaasa as well as customary closing conditions such as authority approvals. The completion of the transaction is expected to take place in the beginning of the year 2026. Castrén & Snellman is collaborating with CMS Wistrand, Stena Line’s advisor on Swedish law matters in connection with the transaction.
Case published 4.11.2025
We are acting as the joint legal advisor to Oomi Oy and Lumme Energia Oy in a transaction whereby Lumme Energia will merge with Oomi. As from the completion of the merger, the combined entity will be the largest electricity retail and service company in the Finnish market. In 2024, Oomi reported a turnover of EUR 373.9 million and had approximately 110 employees. Lumme Energia’s turnover for the same year was approximately EUR 314.6 million and it had approximately 50 employees. The transaction is primarily driven by the recent developments in the electricity market and the strategic goal to develop competitive products and services. Another key objective is to further enhance the customer experience, which is a shared value between the two companies. As a result of the merger, Lumme Energia’s customers will transfer to Oomi, and Lumme Energia will become one of Oomi’s shareholders. The completion of the transaction is subject to an approval by the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority.
Case published 29.8.2025