26.10.2016

Attention Employers: Professional Standards Are Coming to Russia

More than 500 new professional standards (“profstandards”) have already been adopted by the Russian Ministry of Labour, and 300 more profstandards are expected by the end of 2016. Employers must apply these new standards from 1 July 2016 onwards. Failing to comply with them can end with a warning or even fines for the company and its general manager. 

What is a Profstandard?

A profstandard is a legally-required standard aimed at improving the quality of labour resources, employees’ professional growth, and compliance with international qualification standards (link in Russian). Applying to certain types of work, profstandards include:

Industries such as metallurgical engineering, timber, chemicals and the hotel business are already required to use their new profstandards.

Examples of some new profstandards for the hotel business include Manager of Hotel Complex/Chain, Head of Food and Beverage Outlet and Confectioner.

The profstandards adopted by the Ministry must be applied whenever any of the following laws specifically requires that a particular standard be applied:

Who Must Apply Profstandards?

Russian law clearly requires the following types of companies to apply profstandards:

At present, commercial entities do not have to apply profstandards to all their employees without exception. In cases when an employer is not required to apply profstandards, the employer may use the profstandards adopted by the Ministry of Labour as a reference point. This could include things like identifying job titles, job functions, requirements for education and work experience, developing personnel management, organising trainings and certifications for employees and development of job descriptions.

How to Apply Profstandards?

If, as an employer, you are required to apply profstandards by the direct requirements of applicable law, you should prepare a procedure that includes, among other things, formal evaluation of your employees and especially adjust their job descriptions and job titles in line with the profstandards, and also revise your remuneration system. It is also important to bring your local acts in line with profstandards.

You are not entitled to dismiss an employee simply because his or her qualifications and profstandard mismatch. Instead, you can either provide your employee with the opportunity to receive supplementary education or you can perform a formal assessment of your employee, which strictly complies with the procedure required by labour law. The Russian Labour Code does permit you to dismiss an employee in case of an unsatisfactory result of such a formal assessment.

Consequences if You Don’t Apply Profstandards?

If your business fails to comply with mandatory profstandards, your business may receive a warning the first time. However, if your business fails to comply with mandatory profstandards again, your business could face administrative fines and other penalties for each violation as follows:

Protecting your business is a good investment and we recommend that you find out whether your company already needs to comply with new mandatory profstandards or whether you may need to be ready to start using profstandards in the near future.

Latest references

We assisted eQ Community Properties Fund in the sale of two healthcare properties to a fund managed by Northern Horizon. The properties have a total floor area of approximately 3,500 square meters. The two properties are located in Espoo and Lahti. The Espoo asset was completed in 2018 and the Lahti asset was completed in 2023. Both assets are operated by Attendo, the leading care provider in the Nordic region.
Case published 9.5.2025
We successfully represented BMW in an exceptionally long dispute over whether the spare rims sold by the defendant and the hub caps included in them infringed BMW’s trademark and design rights. The Market Court found that the sign used by the defendant caused a likelihood of confusion with BMW’s trademarks. The defendant had used the sign on the hub caps and in the marketing of the hub caps and rims, leading the Market Court to find that the defendant had infringed BMW’s trademark rights. The defendant admitted to infringing BMW’s Community design but denied the related injunction claim. However, the Market Court found that there was no particular reason to refrain from issuing an injunction. The Market Court prohibited the defendant from continuing to infringe BMW’s trademarks and Community design and ordered the defendant to alter or destroy the products and marketing materials that infringed BMW’s rights. Furthermore, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay BMW EUR 70,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 80,000 in damages for the trademark infringements, as well as EUR 7,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 8,000 in damages for the design right infringement. The amounts can be considered exceptionally high in Finland. Additionally, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay a significant portion of BMW’s legal costs with interest on late payment. In its decision of 11 March 2025, the Supreme Court of Finland did not grant the defendant leave to appeal, and also decided that there was no need to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union. Thus, the Market Court’s judgements (MAO:494/18 ja 517/2023) are final. In addition to the main dispute, BMW demanded in a separate proceeding that one of the defendant’s trademark registrations be revoked. A total of three separate legal proceedings were conducted in the Market Court regarding the revocation. The defendant’s trademark registration was ultimately revoked.
Case published 9.5.2025
We are advising DNA Plc in brand protection and intellectual property enforcement matters globally. Our intellectual property team manages DNA’s global trademark portfolio, including registration, prosecution, opposition and enforcement. We also advise DNA in questions concerning consumer and marketing law, unfair competition, social media, domain names and cybersquatting. DNA Plc is one of Finland’s leading telecommunication companies. DNA offers connections, services and devices for homes and workplaces, contributing to the digitalisation of society. The company has approximately 3.7 million subscriptions in its fixed and mobile communications networks. In 2024, DNA’s total revenue was EUR 1,100 million, and the company employs about 1,600 people around Finland. DNA is part of Telenor Group.
Case published 7.5.2025
Castrén & Snellman’s Attorney Christer Svartström acted as the administrator in the restructuring proceedings of Foodiq Oy, which began on 11 March 2024. Foodiq is a unique future food focused company that develops and produces plant and milk-based products for both the private and public sectors. The company’s largest shareholder is a Swedish investment company focusing on FoodTec, Nicoya AB. The majority of creditors approved the draft restructuring programme in expedited proceedings after restructuring proceedings that lasted just under a year. The District Court of Helsinki affirmed the restructuring programme including the one-day payment programme on 10 March 2025 and appointed Attorney Christer Svartström as the supervisor of the programme. In cooperation with the parties, they found an effective and quick restructuring solution for the company, avoiding a long-term programme and allowing the company to focus on its core business. The restructuring programme was financed by investments made by the company’s investors. At the same time, the one-day programme provided a better outcome for creditors compared to a longer programme. The implementation of the restructuring programme ended successfully on 28 March 2025.
Case published 6.5.2025