5.10.2023

Amendment to the Energy Efficiency Directive can trigger a wave of renovation in Finland

An amendment to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive is being prepared in the EU. The aim of the amendment is to reduce the energy consumption of buildings, prevent energy poverty, increase energy self-sufficiency and reduce climate emissions. For the construction industry, this means cutting greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption by 2030 and making the industry climate neutral by 2050 by renovating buildings that are not energy efficient.

New buildings should be emission-free as of 2030, and the energy efficiency classification should be updated by 2025. The Commission has also proposed that Member States improve the energy efficiency of their building stock to the level of the updated classification. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd estimates that the need for improvements concerns approximately 35 % of Finland’s building stock.

The objective of the revision is positive, and it can open up new opportunities for the energy industry as well as the construction industry. Many property owners are already acting in accordance with the expected requirements, and properties that meet the energy efficiency criteria will become ever more attractive to investors and owners. On the other hand, a large number of property owners are not prepared. They must do a considerable amount of work to improve energy efficiency over a short period of time compared to the property owners whose portfolios are ready for the revised Directive.

Financiers wish to support the green transition, and construction projects that improve energy efficiency can acquire financing more easily and affordably. However, rising interest rates and high inflation can complicate the matter.

According to the Commission, renovation should be encouraged with funding and other supporting measures, but the distribution and allocation of this funding remains unclear. In addition to the possibilities for commercial operators, it should be kept in mind that the Directive will also require action by private homeowners and that the new government programme is not clear on how these homeowners will be supported.

Negotiations on the revised content of the Directive are still ongoing. It is estimated that national legislation would enter into force in early 2026. Companies should follow the preparation actively: if the Directive enters into force in its current form, demand may increase in the construction market. It is a good idea to discuss the matter with financiers ahead of time, so that financing is available when needed. We support our clients throughout this process as their strategic partner, both in the preparation phase as well as all the stages of any construction projects.

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy. 
Case published 9.9.2026