26.11.2020

What Options Do Companies Have for This Spring’s General Meetings?

Preparations for this spring’s general meetings are already well under way in many listed companies. Teresa Kauppila presents three alternatives for arranging general meetings. The key differences between the alternatives are the extent to which the meeting is held remotely.

Preparations for this spring’s general meetings are already well under way in many listed companies. The fact that no one knows for sure what the COVID-19 situation will be in the spring adds an additional twist to preparations this time around.

However, it doesn’t take a fortune teller to make a prediction: the larger the company and the earlier in the spring the general meeting is planned to be held, the more likely it is that the company will have to make some kind of remote participation arrangements.

This time around, the situation is not catching companies by surprise like last year, and it is reasonable to expect both companies and shareholders to be better prepared. For companies this means that shareholders must be provided with up-to-date means of participation. Shareholders in turn can be expected to actively make use of these means.

Like last spring, this spring will be a good opportunity to gather experiences of different meeting arrangements. It is likely that the Limited Liability Companies Act will be amended at some point to permanently provide companies with more options for arranging their general meetings. However, it is too early to say when that will happen and what the final contents of such a reform would look like.

Three Alternatives

Companies have three main alternatives for arranging their general meetings this spring. The key difference is the extent to which the meeting is held remotely:

In this connection, it is worth noting that in the case of general meetings, remote participation does not necessarily mean that all attendees would participate in the meeting using their own computers from wherever they happen to be. While it would be possible to organise this kind of real-time participation, no listed company has done so to our knowledge. In most cases, remote participation has been organised through advance voting.

Is Dialogue Possible Remotely?

Listed companies should not count on all of their shareholders being able to participate in person this spring – at least not if the general meeting is being planned for the beginning of the general meeting season. Most companies will probably choose between a hybrid meeting and a fully remote meeting. The temporary legislation allowing stock exchange listed companies and First North companies to hold remote meetings will likely only be in force until the end of next June.

A key part of traditional general meetings is the dialogue between shareholders and the company’s management. It is important to give some thought to how to enable this dialogue when planning a remote meeting, particularly if the general meeting is being organised as a ‘paper meeting’, i.e. solely based on advance voting. One option worth considering is holding an entirely separate event for dialogue.

Keep Your Options Open

Depending on how the meeting is being organised, it is clear that planning a general meeting in the middle of a pandemic is a balancing act between shareholder rights on the one hand and the health and safety of shareholders and other stakeholders on the other.

This year has made it clear that the COVID-19 situation and the related restrictions and recommendations can change very quickly. Companies would be wise to monitor the situation closely and keep their options open for as long as possible.

When it comes time to send out the notices convening the general meeting, it is important to clearly communicate the different ways of participating and what they mean in practice to the shareholders.

Latest references

We advised Suominen Corporation in connection with its rights issue. The offering was oversubscribed, and the company raised gross proceeds of approximately EUR 28 million. We also advised Suominen in connection with the renegotiation of the terms of the company’s three-year EUR 100 million syndicated credit facility, under which the maturity was extended and headroom was added to the financial covenants. “I would like to thank our shareholders for their support and confidence in Suominen’s future. The completion of the Offering will enable us to accelerate the implementation of our Full Potential Program while strengthening our capital structure. Our transformation particularly focuses on enhancing the reliability and efficiency of our production and supply, and on reinforcing our commercial capabilities, allowing us to better meet the expectations of our customers and shareholders”, comments Charles Héaulmé, President and CEO of Suominen. Suominen is a nonwovens manufacturer operating in global markets. Suominen creates value by taking fiber raw materials and turning them into nonwovens that the company’s customers convert into both consumer and professional end products. Suominen’s vision is to be the frontrunner for nonwovens innovation and sustainability. Suominen’s net sales in 2025 were EUR 412.4 million and the company has almost 700 professionals working in Europe and in the Americas. Suominen’s shares are listed on Nasdaq Helsinki.
Case published 6.7.2026
We advised Aurevia Oy, a portfolio company of French private equity sponsor Mérieux Equity Partners, in a strategic reorganisation that involved splitting Aurevia and its parent companies into two independent groups of companies and reorganisation of its existing debt-financing arrangements. Following the reorganisation, the newly formed Aurevia continues as a leading provider of Contract Research Organization (CRO) and Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs (QARA) services, while the newly formed Labquality focuses on delivering External Quality Assessment (EQA) services. Aurevia serves operators in the medical devices, in vitro diagnostics and pharmaceutical sectors. Labquality’s customers include clinical laboratories and social and healthcare organisations. The reorganisation positions Aurevia and Labquality to allocate investments more effectively, accelerate growth within their respective customer segments, and respond to evolving market and client needs. The transaction was implemented through multiple parallel demergers and required comprehensive legal and tax structuring across several jurisdictions. Our team supported Aurevia throughout the planning and implementation phases, covering corporate, tax, employment law, and regulatory matters, as well as the optimisation of each group’s financing structure.
Case published 7.4.2026
We advise Fingrid Oyj in a transaction in which Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company is selling its holding of approximately 20 per cent of the shares in Fingrid to the Finnish State and OP Pohjola Kantaverkko Holding Ky. Fingrid owns Finland’s main electricity transmission grid and all significant cross-border transmission connections. The main grid is the backbone of the electricity transmission network, to which major power plants, industrial plants and regional electricity distribution networks are connected. 
Case published 11.2.2026
We acted as legal adviser to EcoUp Oyj in a directed share issue, through which EcoUp raised a total of approximately EUR 3 million in gross proceeds to strengthen the company’s capital structure and finance its growth. The share issue was directed to a limited group of domestic investors, deviating from the shareholders’ pre-emptive subscription right. EcoUp’s shares are traded on the First North Growth Market Finland marketplace maintained by Nasdaq Helsinki.  EcoUp promotes the green transition of the construction industry by producing carbon-neutral, energy-efficient and circular economy-based materials, services and technologies that help construction industry players reduce their environmental impact. The company has over 40 years of experience in developing and delivering circular economy solutions to customers.
Case published 29.1.2026