27.5.2024

Three key questions about installing the charging points required by the Charging Points Act

The Act on Equipping Buildings with Electric Vehicle Charging Points and Charging Point Capabilities and Automation and Control Systems, also known as the Charging Points Act, entered into force in November 2020. The time limit for the obligation to install electric car charging points is drawing to a close at the end of this year. The obligation applies to existing non-residential buildings. 

1. To whom does the obligation to install charging points apply and which party supervises it?

Pursuant to section 7 of the Charging Points Act, the building owner of a non-residential building that is currently in use and has more than 20 parking spaces in the building or in the property has to ensure that the building has at least one charging point for electric vehicles by no later than 31 December 2024. The obligation does not concern existing residential buildings or buildings that are planned to be demolished.

Compliance with this section of law is supervised by the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency. If the building owner does not comply with this obligation to install a charging point, the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency requires the owner to remedy the matter in a time limit set by the Agency. If the charging point is not installed within the time limit, the Agency sets a new time limit for the installation and may reinforce the order under the threat of a fine or the threat that the installation of charging point will be commissioned at the expense of the owner.

2. Is it necessary to install the charging point if the building is not in use?

The section of law states that it is applied to a building that is in use, and according to the government proposal concerning the Charging Points Act, the charging point does not have to be installed if the building is not in use. However, the Charging Points Act and the government proposal concerning it do not take a stand on the definition of a building not in use.

The Land Use and Building Act states that bringing a building into use requires that a building control authority has approved the building for commissioning in a final inspection or an interim final inspection. If the Charging Points Act is interpreted in accordance with the Land Use and Building Act, a building is in use even if it is completely empty, provided that a building control authority has approved it for commissioning. This interpretation would mean that a building is not in use if an authority has prohibited its use or if it has not yet been approved for commissioning.

3. Which party is responsible for installing the charging point if the building is leased?

Pursuant to the Charging Points Act, the obligation to see to the installation of the charging point lies with the building owner and does therefore not concern the lessee of the building or property. If the building owner has leased the grounds it owns to a lessee, the building owner needs to pay attention to the requirements under which the statutory charging point can be installed in the area leased to the lessee, particularly in a situation where the lessor or charging point operator will engage in charging point business in the leased area.

Latest references

We advised CapMan Real Estate in the acquisition and financing of a high-quality residential asset located in Katajanokka, Helsinki.  The asset was acquired from the Finnish Seamen’s Service Bureau (MEPA).  The property consisting of 38 modern rental apartments with a parking garage was completed in 2017. The building features high-quality construction, modern floorplans, and well-designed communal areas including a gym and rooftop sauna premises, and blends with the area’s historic maritime character. The residential asset is located in the prestigious Katajanokka seaside district of central Helsinki, known for its architectural heritage and proximity to the city centre. The property has a high ESG profile which will be further improved by CapMan Real Estate.
Case published 6.11.2025
We advised Prisma Properties in a real estate transaction in which the company acquired a retail property in Helsinki from Hartela.  The acquired property was built specifically for the discount retailer Jula. Completed in October 2025, the property is modern and very energy-efficient, and it is fully leased to Jula under a 10-year lease agreement. The property located in the Konala district, adjacent to the busy Ristikko shopping centre, spans 2,600 square metres. Prisma Properties is a fast-growing developer and long-term owner of modern properties for discount retail, grocery retail, and quick-service restaurants. The company operates across the Nordics and manages a property portfolio valued at approximately EUR 650 million, primarily consisting of newly developed properties with long lease agreements.
Case published 29.10.2025
We advised DNB Bank ASA in its agreement with Fennia Mutual Insurance Company on the development and lease of the premises at Fabianinkatu 8, Helsinki. With the lease agreement, DNB Bank ASA will focus all its Finnish operations at the Fabian 8 office. The other tenants at the renewed premises will be DNB Carnegie Investment Bank AB’s Finnish operations and DNB Auto Finance Oy. In connection with the long-term lease agreement, the parties also agreed on a major renovation project to completely refurbish the premises. The object of lease will be completed in the second half of 2027.
Case published 10.10.2025
We advised OP-Public Services Real Estate Fund in the sale of a portfolio of six care properties to Aedifica group, a Belgian real estate company specialised in European healthcare real estate, particularly in elderly care. The care properties in this portfolio are located across Finland in Helsinki, Tampere, Kuopio, Tuusula and Kirkkonummi. The portfolio has a total capacity for 233 residents. Aedifica group acquired 100% of the shares of the six real estate companies that own the properties. The total value of the transaction is approximately EUR 37.5 million.
Case published 26.6.2025