24.5.2024

The CSDD Directive holds companies accountable for the impacts of their operations

The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D, CSDDD) aims to ensure that companies operating in the EU conduct due diligence with respect to human rights and environmental risks in their operations and chains of operations. The directive will require companies to identify, prevent, mitigate, and account for potential and actual adverse impacts on people and the environment. Companies must ensure that their business model and strategy are aligned with the objectives of the transition to a sustainable economy and with the limiting of global warming to 1.5 °C and that their operations are aligned with the objective of achieving climate neutrality as established in the European Climate Law.

The CS3D has received much attention during this spring as it received backlash from various member states. In the end, certain changes were made to the scope of the directive and the requirements around civil liability. On 14 December 2023, the European Council and the European Parliament announced that they had reached a provisional agreement on the text of the CS3D. However, the political agreement on CS3D failed to gain sufficient support by the EU Member States in February 2024. In March 2024, the Council voted in favour of the amended CS3D, and on 24 April 2024, the Parliament adopted its final text in plenary. On 24 May 2024, the directive was finally approved by the ministers in the Competitiveness Council, and the directive will enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the EU Official Journal.

The directive is applicable to EU companies having more than 1,000 employees and a net worldwide turnover exceeding EUR 450 million and to companies established outside of the EU with a turnover exceeding EUR 450 million from the EU. The directive includes rules that concern groups of companies. The directive is also applicable to licensors/franchisors that have a turnover of more than EUR 80 million and that receive significant royalties (more than EUR 22,5 million) based on franchising or licensing agreements.

The practical implementation of the due diligence processes calls for systematic and continuous activities that are reflected throughout the chain of operations. The process itself is not new as the voluntary UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Corporations already set a similar standard and process for companies to consider their adverse impacts. However, the CS3D is not soft law, unlike the UN Guiding Principles and OECD Guidelines.

In practice, companies must set a process that will integrate due diligence into their policies and risk management systems;

  • identify, assess and (where necessary) prioritise potential and actual adverse impacts;

  • prevent and mitigate potential adverse impacts;

  • bring actual adverse impacts to an end or minimise their extent;

  • remediate actual adverse impacts;

  • carry out meaningful engagement with stakeholders;

  • establish and maintain a notification mechanism and complaints procedure;

  • monitor the effectiveness of their due diligence policy and measures; and

  • communicate publicly on due diligence. Companies will be required to publicly communicate on their compliance with the CS3D, where they are not already subject to the reporting requirements of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive.

The directive provides for effective means to combat climate change. Member states shall ensure that companies within the scope of the directive adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation, which aims to ensure, through best efforts, that the business model and strategy of the company are compatible with the transition to a sustainable economy and with the limiting of global warming to 1,5 ºC in line with the Paris Agreement. This transition plan shall contain time-bound targets for 2030 and five-year steps up to 2050 based on conclusive scientific evidence and including, where appropriate, absolute emission reduction targets. The emission reduction targets shall concern greenhouse gas emissions in scope 1, scope 2 and scope 3.

The transition plan shall include concrete information of potential changes in the company’s product and service portfolio, adoption of new technologies, investments and funding supporting the implementation of the transition plan as well as the role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies regarding the plan.

Given that scope 3 emissions are included in the required emission reductions, the impact of the directive goes far beyond the companies that are directly within the scope of the directive. Indirectly, the directive will have a major impact on companies within the upstream and downstream value chain of the companies bound by the directive. This means that we are likely to see a network of agreements between companies requiring emission reductions in line with the Paris Agreement.

Member states have until 2026 to implement the legislation, and the application begins in 2027 with companies with over 5,000 employees and revenue of EUR 1.5 billion. The second stage of application in 2028 is companies with over 3,000 employees and revenue of EUR 900 million and the third stage is by 2029 for companies with over 1,000 employees and revenue of EUR 450 million.

Failure to comply with the directive could lead to a sanction of up to 5% of the company’s global turnover. National implementation of the directive will determine the final sanctions and the determined authority to oversee the directive in Finland. As noted in our blog, there is a clear rise in impact litigation around Europe, and the CS3D will allow a new avenue as a company can be held liable for damage caused to any person where the company has failed, intentionally or negligently, to comply with the due diligence obligations of CS3D. 

Lia Heasman has defended her doctoral dissertation on due diligence and human rights in the value chain. She has also served as an expert in a study conducted by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, Civic Consulting and LSE Consulting. The study deals with human rights due diligence. In the study, she acted as an expert on the regulation of Finland, Sweden, and Denmark. 

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy. 
Case published 9.9.2026