1.12.2020

Sustainable Development through Statutes or Self-Regulation?

Corporate law is normally a very stable field, but change is now in the air. General meetings will be organised in new ways this spring and likely beyond. The new Corporate Governance Code has put remuneration policies on the agenda of general meetings this year and will put remuneration reports on the agenda starting next year. The European Commission has launched a public on sustainable corporate governance. On top of all this, the Finnish Ministry of Justice is currently reviewing the Limited Liability Companies Act in its entirety. It’s enough to make one short of breath.

It is clear that legislation and good governance have to be developed at pace with the rest of the world. The needs of companies and their owners, investors, customers and other stakeholders are changing, and requirements are tightening. This in turn is accelerating the reform cycle for legislation.

However, every detail does not need its own section is the Limited Liability Companies Act. Our corporate legislation has been developed to be flexible and serve many different kinds of companies. The act itself is supplemented by self-regulation, which allows companies to choose their own ways to respond to changes in their environment. Self-regulation has a good track record in Finland. Companies understand that sustainability requires them to do more than just meet the minimum requirements of law.

Does it really make sense to fix something that isn’t broken by making the Limited Liability Companies Act less flexible? It has been proposed that sustainable development should be incorporated into the purpose of companies and the duties of management, i.e. be expressly included in the Limited Liability Companies Act. However, sustainable development is already on the agenda of many boards of directors, with customers, society and other stakeholders are encouraging companies to make sustainable choices. Careful management teams that have their company’s best interest at heart cannot afford to ignore these matters.

Careful thought should be given to whether sustainable development should be folded into corporate legislation or whether it would be better to use special legislation and self-regulation to steer companies towards better choices. The end does not always justify the means.

Latest references

We advise Fingrid Oyj in a transaction in which Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company is selling its holding of approximately 20 per cent of the shares in Fingrid to the Finnish State and OP Pohjola Kantaverkko Holding Ky. Fingrid owns Finland’s main electricity transmission grid and all significant cross-border transmission connections. The main grid is the backbone of the electricity transmission network, to which major power plants, industrial plants and regional electricity distribution networks are connected. 
Case published 11.2.2026
We acted as legal adviser to EcoUp Oyj in a directed share issue, through which EcoUp raised a total of approximately EUR 3 million in gross proceeds to strengthen the company’s capital structure and finance its growth. The share issue was directed to a limited group of domestic investors, deviating from the shareholders’ pre-emptive subscription right. EcoUp’s shares are traded on the First North Growth Market Finland marketplace maintained by Nasdaq Helsinki.  EcoUp promotes the green transition of the construction industry by producing carbon-neutral, energy-efficient and circular economy-based materials, services and technologies that help construction industry players reduce their environmental impact. The company has over 40 years of experience in developing and delivering circular economy solutions to customers.
Case published 29.1.2026
We acted as the legal counsel to Enersize Plc, in its rights issue, where the company raised gross proceeds of approximately MSEK 8.3 in order to promote continued growth and be able to meet increased demand from its customers. The proceeds were allocated to market expansion and sales efforts as well as product, licence and technical validation and development, amongst other things. In connection with the rights issue, warrants were issued free of charge and the subscription period for new shares pursuant to the warrants will run from 1 October 2025 up to and including 15 October 2025. Enersize is a Finnish public limited company having its shares listed on Nasdaq Stockholm First North Growth Market. The company’s shares are traded only in Sweden. Enersize develops and provides software, tools, and services to improve the energy efficiency of industrial compressed air systems, serving industrial companies for whom energy efficiency is both an economic and environmental consideration. With the aim of reducing energy consumption, detecting leaks, and improving performance, its technology enables detailed monitoring, analysis, and real-time optimisation of compressed air systems. 
Case published 21.11.2025
We acted as Finnish counsel to Pernod Ricard in the sale of a portfolio of local Nordic brands to Oy Hartwall Ab, an affiliate of the Danish group Royal Unibrew. Pernod Ricard is a worldwide leader in the spirits and wine industry. The local portfolio of brands includes spirits, liqueurs and Finnish wine brands, the best-known being the liqueur Minttu, along with their related production assets based in Turku, Finland.
Case published 21.10.2024