1.12.2020

Sustainable Development through Statutes or Self-Regulation?

Corporate law is normally a very stable field, but change is now in the air. General meetings will be organised in new ways this spring and likely beyond. The new Corporate Governance Code has put remuneration policies on the agenda of general meetings this year and will put remuneration reports on the agenda starting next year. The European Commission has launched a public on sustainable corporate governance. On top of all this, the Finnish Ministry of Justice is currently reviewing the Limited Liability Companies Act in its entirety. It’s enough to make one short of breath.

It is clear that legislation and good governance have to be developed at pace with the rest of the world. The needs of companies and their owners, investors, customers and other stakeholders are changing, and requirements are tightening. This in turn is accelerating the reform cycle for legislation.

However, every detail does not need its own section is the Limited Liability Companies Act. Our corporate legislation has been developed to be flexible and serve many different kinds of companies. The act itself is supplemented by self-regulation, which allows companies to choose their own ways to respond to changes in their environment. Self-regulation has a good track record in Finland. Companies understand that sustainability requires them to do more than just meet the minimum requirements of law.

Does it really make sense to fix something that isn’t broken by making the Limited Liability Companies Act less flexible? It has been proposed that sustainable development should be incorporated into the purpose of companies and the duties of management, i.e. be expressly included in the Limited Liability Companies Act. However, sustainable development is already on the agenda of many boards of directors, with customers, society and other stakeholders are encouraging companies to make sustainable choices. Careful management teams that have their company’s best interest at heart cannot afford to ignore these matters.

Careful thought should be given to whether sustainable development should be folded into corporate legislation or whether it would be better to use special legislation and self-regulation to steer companies towards better choices. The end does not always justify the means.

Latest references

We acted as legal adviser to Martela Corporation in its directed share issue, through which Martela raised gross proceeds of approximately EUR 7.2 million to strengthen the company’s financial position and liquidity and to create headroom for continuing the necessary development and efficiency measures. In connection with the directed share issue, Martela’s unlisted series K shares, which carried greater voting rights, were combined with its listed series A shares. Following the combination, the company has only one share series, which is traded on the regulated market maintained by Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd, with each share carrying one vote and otherwise identical rights. Martela is a Nordic leader specialising in user-centric working and learning environments. With over 80 years of experience, Martela creates the best places to work and offers its customers the Martela Lifecycle solutions which combine furniture and related services into a seamless whole.
Case published 27.10.2026
We advised Aspo Plc, ESL Shipping Ltd and AtoBatC Shipping AB in relation to finance matters in connection with the demerger of Aspo, by which all the shares in ESL Shipping Ltd held by Aspo, together with the related assets and liabilities, will be transferred to a new independent company to be named ESL Shipping Group Plc. Aspo intends to apply for the shares of ESL Shipping Group to be admitted to trading on the regulated market of Nasdaq Helsinki. It is further intended that Aspo be renamed Telko Group Plc. 
Case published 19.8.2026
We advised Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance in connection with the financing of its real estate portfolio. Following the entry into force of the Finnish pension reform on 1 July 2026, pension insurance companies now have greater flexibility to utilise debt financing within their real estate portfolios, and Ilmarinen is one of the first to seize this opportunity.
Case published 6.8.2026
We advised Suominen Corporation in connection with its rights issue. The offering was oversubscribed, and the company raised gross proceeds of approximately EUR 28 million. We also advised Suominen in connection with the renegotiation of the terms of the company’s three-year EUR 100 million syndicated credit facility, under which the maturity was extended and headroom was added to the financial covenants. “I would like to thank our shareholders for their support and confidence in Suominen’s future. The completion of the Offering will enable us to accelerate the implementation of our Full Potential Program while strengthening our capital structure. Our transformation particularly focuses on enhancing the reliability and efficiency of our production and supply, and on reinforcing our commercial capabilities, allowing us to better meet the expectations of our customers and shareholders”, comments Charles Héaulmé, President and CEO of Suominen. Suominen is a nonwovens manufacturer operating in global markets. Suominen creates value by taking fiber raw materials and turning them into nonwovens that the company’s customers convert into both consumer and professional end products. Suominen’s vision is to be the frontrunner for nonwovens innovation and sustainability. Suominen’s net sales in 2025 were EUR 412.4 million and the company has almost 700 professionals working in Europe and in the Americas. Suominen’s shares are listed on Nasdaq Helsinki.
Case published 6.7.2026