If your company uses SAP’s enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, it is about time to start thinking about the future.
5.5.2021
SAP Ending Support of ERP System in 2030 – Start Migrating to a New System Now
Related services
Tags
SAP has announced that it will end support and maintenance of its current ERP system at the end of 2030. Many companies will be facing an update or migration to a new system.
New System Enables Streamlining of IT Architecture
Before changing to a new system, it is important to map out your company’s current and future needs. System updates are a business-critical change for many companies, but when done right, they can open to door to significant cost savings.
Migrating to a new system also gives companies the opportunity to take a look at the company’s operations and re-evaluate the need for customisation. Migrating to a new platform can also help to simplify IT architecture and adopt cloud services.
It is often the case that by altering its own operations, a company can adopt standard solutions, which make operations more efficient and create savings.
SAP Offering SAP S/4HANA as Replacement
As its new ERP system, SAP is offering the SAP S/4HANA system, which uses SAP’s own HANA database. SAP’s previous software solutions have used, e.g. Oracle’s and other suppliers’ databases. This being the case, the system change will also require migrating databases into the new S/4HANA ERP system.
This system migration will require a great deal of work and planning from companies. The migration requires the adoption of the new system as well as conversions and data transfers. Given that the common SAP ECC version and S/4HANA have completely different system architectures, updating and conversion could prove to be surprisingly work intensive. This is more than just a version update, it is the adoption of a genuinely new system.
New System, New Contracts
Migrating to a new system will also require contract negotiations with SAP covering terms of use, prices and potentially support and maintenance. Negotiations always take time and resources.
The customer also needs to understand both its own ambitions with respect to its existing systems as well as the transformation process.
Don’t be Caught Shorthanded at Crunch Time
There is no overabundance of SAP experts in Finland. If many companies leave this migration to the last minute, they are going to find themselves shorthanded. This could increase costs and the risk of failure. The demand for skilled experts will grow as more customers decide to update their systems.
Time to Get Started
Even though 2030 still seems a long way off, it would be wise to start planning and preparing now. There is certain to be more room for negotiations with SAP now than closer to the end of support and maintenance for the current system.
The key to success is good preparation and planning. You will need to engage in negotiations on two fronts, as in addition to the system project, you will also need a partner to handle the system implementation, conversion and data migrations.
The road may be long and rocky, and it is wise to pick partners who will help carry the load to reach the best result.
Latest insights
Article published 2.2.2026 – Data & Technology
Avoid costly risks with well-drafted distribution agreements
Article published 10.10.2024 – Data & Technology
New act on dual-use items entered into force in September – what companies need to know
Article published 5.9.2024 – Data & Technology
Technology acquisitions can boost companies’ growth – or cause them to fail
Article published 6.5.2024 – Employment
Outsourcing company functions – four key points for success
Topi Lusenius & Samuli Salminen
Kim Parviainen & Lauri Laatunen
Topi Lusenius, Anders Forss & Kim Parviainen
Tomi Kemppainen, Kim Parviainen & Eija Warma-Lehtinen
Latest references
Downing – Acquisition of the entire share capital of Tornionlaakson Voima
We advised UK-based investment company Downing in its acquisition of the entire share capital of Tornionlaakson Voima Oy. Tornionlaakson Voima owns three hydropower plants in the Tengeliönjoki river system – the Portimokoski power plants in Ylitornio, the Jolmankoski power plants in Raanujärvi and the Kaaranneskoski power plants in Sirkkakoski. The power plants produce a total of approx. 45 gigawatt-hours of electricity per year. Tornionlaakson Voima’s daily operations will continue normally, and the transaction will not affect customers. The consummation of the transaction is subject to the approval of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment. Downing has over 35 years’ experience in providing a wide range of investment solutions to the needs of institutional investors, advisers and retail investors. The company manages over £2 billion in assets in both the private and public markets and its current hydro power portfolio includes approx. 50 hydro power plants in the Nordics.
Case published 27.3.2026
LähiTapiola and OP Henkivakuutus – Successful representation of insurance companies in Supreme Administrative Court health data processing cases
We successfully represented insurance companies LähiTapiola and OP Henkivakuutus in two cases concerning an important point of principle: the right of insurance companies to process health data as part of the insurance application process. The Supreme Administrative Court handed down twin decisions ( one published as precedent ) addressing the matter in light of contrary DPA decisions. Under the Finnish Data Protection Act, insurance companies may, to simplify, process health data concerning “insured persons” (vakuutettu, försäkrad) to determine liability under the insurance. This rule constitutes an exception to Article 9 GDPR. At issue was whether the term “insured person” also covers people in the process of obtaining insurance coverage or only people who are already covered. In more practical terms: can an insurance company rely on the rule when considering whether/how to grant the insurance in the first place? The SAC answered in the affirmative and thus upheld the traditional industry approach over the DPA’s contrary view. The SAC noted that the Data Protection Act did not define the term “insured person” and thus looked at insurance legislation for guidance. As argued by the insurance companies, that legislation also uses the term in the context of describing the insured person’s pre-contractual informational obligations. Thus, and in view of the underlying purpose of the rule at issue, the SAC found that an “insured person” could be someone in the process of obtaining coverage, not just a person already covered. The outcome clarifies the scope of the local rule at the insurance application stage for the Finnish insurance industry.
Case published 22.1.2026
SuperOffice – Acquisition of Lyyti
We acted as Finnish counsel to SuperOffice AS, backed by Axcel, in its acquisition of Lyyti Oy from Finnish private equity firm Vaaka Partners and other sellers. Lyyti is a leading event management software company for physical, digital and hybrid events with a strong customer base in Finland, Sweden and France. SuperOffice is a leading provider of customer relationship management (CRM) software for small and medium-sized businesses across Northern Europe. Axcel is a Nordic private equity firm with a focus on technology, business services and industrials, healthcare, and consumer sectors.
Case published 9.12.2025
Lantmännen – Acquisition of Leipurin from Aspo
We advised Lantmännen ek för in its contemplated acquisition of Leipurin from Aspo Plc. Lantmännen is an agricultural cooperative and Northern Europe’s leader in agriculture, machinery, bioenergy and food products. Lantmännen is owned by 17,000 Swedish farmers and has 12,000 employees in over 20 countries. Leipurin is a leading Nordic supplier of bakery ingredients, equipment, and expert services to professional bakeries, confectioneries, and food manufacturers. The company operates across Finland, Sweden, and the Baltic countries with subsidiaries located in the aforementioned countries, providing comprehensive solutions to the baking industry. The closing of the transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals.
Case published 25.8.2025