19.10.2016

Responsible Investors and Active Owners

Responsible investing has been a hot topic this autumn, despite the fact that it isn’t really anything new. In fact, the UN’s responsible investing guidelines turn ten years old this year. What are the issues that investors focus on today?

Investors as Drivers of Change

When visiting Finland in August, Roel Nieuwenkamp of the OECD described how the focus investors have put on responsibility has completely changed the game. For example, a Dutch pension fund sold its holdings in pharmaceuticals company Mylan after it was alleged that the company’s drugs were being used to carry out executions in the US.

Institutional investors have taken the lead in the field of responsible investing for a while now, and require that ESG (environmental, social and governance) principles be complied with in their investment targets.

Private equity investors are also increasingly viewing potential investments through the lens of responsibility. Concrete evidence of this is that the Finnish Venture Capital Association is currently drafting responsible investment recommendations for its members. The recommendations point investors towards active ownership.

The key is not just to have responsibility principles in existence, but to actively weave them into the daily operations of target companies. High standards for responsibility and their effective implementation can also serve as strategic advantages when raising venture capital.

Incorporating ESG Principles into Legal Documentation

We currently seem to be seeing a kind of ESG 2.0 phenomenon. Investors and parties managing investments have a more solid will to commit to ESG principles. The clearest evidence of this is the incorporation of responsibility issues into standard legal due diligence reviews of investment targets. We have also been discussing how to incorporate ESG principles into investment documentation in a way that would be legally binding on the parties.

Reaping the Benefits of Business Opportunities

Investors have a twofold interest in responsibility issues. An ESG analysis will provide investors with an assessment of a target company’s current state. The analysis can also be used to guide an active ownership policy and steer the target company away from a path that could lead to identified cost risks being realised. On the other hand, an investor’s focus on responsibility issues can open up entirely new business opportunities based on, for example, sustainable development.

Responsibility is here to stay, and companies would be wise to make the most of the business opportunities brought by sustainable development, for example, in the circular economy.

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy. 
Case published 9.9.2026