14.7.2016

M&A World Is Waking up to Smell the Potential in Finland

Related services

In Europe, the M&A year 2016 has not started off quite as well as many had hoped. In H1 2016, European investment activity was down by 19 percent in deal value compared to the same period in 2015. The continent’s M&A was dragged down by the uncertainty created by the UK’s EU referendum, as well as the US government’s clampdown on tax inversion deals.

Brexit especially slowed down investments made to the UK. Following a record 2015, UK M&A activity during the first half of the year recorded 638 deals worth approximately EUR 50 billion, a near 70 percent decline compared to H1 2015 and its lowest deal value since 2010.

During this economic slump and uncertainty, the Nordics remained stable compared to the slow economic growth and market volatility within Europe. The Nordic region attracted 497 deals worth EUR 38 billion, which represented a good 40 percent increase by value compared to H1 2015.  The region represented 12 % of the total M&A value on the European deal making scene. Therefore, the Nordics has become an increasingly attractive M&A destination.

Four M&A Trends in Finland in 2016

A recent blog post on the Huffington post by Ira Kalb declares Finland to be the World’s Best Kept Secret, stating that Finnish products and companies haven’t been able to market themselves abroad as well as they should have – and deserve. However, in the light of recent Mergermarket M&A trend report for H1 2016, this seems not to ring entirely true.

Finland recorded 76 deals in the first half of 2016 worth EUR 11.2 billion, an almost 370% increase by value compared to H1 2015 (84 deals, EUR 2.4 billion). The highest valued deal of the first quarter was the EUR 646 million acquisition of the Kevitsa mine by the Sweden-based company Boliden. The statistics for the second quarter were again dominated by the sale of majority stake in Supercell, a company valued at USD 10,2 billion, by the Japanese telecom giant SoftBank to Chinese internet giant Tencent.

While the Finnish M&A landscape was dominated during H1 by some large-cap deals, some of which we had the privilege to work on, such deals often blur the rest of the statistics and thus may distract from other, sometimes more solid, or at least interesting, trends.

From our perspective, we have seen the following trends in this year’s Finnish M&A activity.

 

Sources:

Mergermarket H1 2016 M&A trend report + other Mergermarket deal insights
Thomson Reuters Mid-Market M&A Review, H1 2016

Latest references

We delivered two AI workshops for Fortum Corporation’s Mergers and Acquisitions team, with both legal and business professionals participating. The sessions combined fundamental AI principles with custom use cases for commercially available AI tools tailored to Fortum’s needs. We also presented a bespoke solution merging AI with a script-based tool developed by our Legal Tech team, enabling a more automated way of working. Our experts conducted the training drawing on their legal background and leading experience in this emerging field of legal technology. Participants particularly appreciated the clarity and relevance of the implementations demonstrated. ‘C&S delivered an excellent, well-structured series of workshops, with directly applicable takeaways,’ says Sabina Hautaviita, Legal Counsel for M&A at Fortum.
Case published 9.3.2026
We successfully represented VR Group before the Supreme Court in a case concerning the meal break practice of commuter train drivers. On 6 February 2026, the Supreme Court ruled in VR’s favour (decision KKO:2026:12), confirming that VR had the right to amend the commuter train drivers’ meal break practice in 2021 by rendering the break unpaid in accordance with the applicable collective agreement. This decision clarifies the interpretation of collective agreements and employment legislation as well as the limits of the employer’s right to direct work. Over 250 commuter train drivers challenged the unpaid meal break practice which VR introduced in April 2021. Before the change, meal breaks had a long history of being paid. The change was based on the train drivers’ collective agreement, which allows for meal breaks to be organised either as paid or unpaid time. The Supreme Court ruled that the scheduling and managing of breaks falls within the core area of the employer’s right to direct work. This increases the threshold for an established practice becoming a binding condition for the parties. Merely following a practice consistently and over a long period of time does not make the practice binding; instead, the employer’s intent to commit to the practice must be clearly evident from the employer’s conduct or other circumstances. As both alternatives – paid and unpaid – for organising meal breaks had been retained in the collective agreement despite other amendments over the years, it could not be considered that VR had intended to commit to the paid break practice and waive its right to direct work as regards break scheduling. It was also significant that the employment contracts explicitly referred only to the collective agreement as regards working time. The Supreme Court deemed that the employees’ paid meal break was not an established term of employment and that VR was entitled to change the practice based on the collective agreement. The employer had the right, by virtue of its right to direct work, to unilaterally change the meal break practice by choosing to apply the other arrangement permitted by the collective agreement.
Case published 3.3.2026
We are assisting CapMan Growth in its significant investment in Kuntokeskus Liikku, a Finnish gym chain known for its high-quality self-service facilities and excellent value for money. The investment will further strengthen Liikku’s position as a market leader and support the continued execution of its growth strategy. Liikku is one of Finland’s leading fitness chains, with more than 70 locations across the country serving nearly 90,000 members. The company’s concept is to offer high-quality self-service gyms at an exceptionally competitive price point which, combined with strong operational efficiency, provides a solid foundation for profitable growth. The company’s main shareholder is COR Group, a long-time partner of CapMan Growth, and a Finnish health and wellness conglomerate known for active ownership and long-term value creation. CapMan Growth is a leading Finnish growth investor that makes significant investments in entrepreneur-led growth companies with a turnover of €10–200 million. CapMan Growth is part of CapMan, which is a leading Nordic private equity investor engaged in active value creation work. CapMan has been listed on the Helsinki Stock Exchange since 2001.
Case published 27.2.2026
Castrén & Snellman successfully assisted Terrafame Ltd in environmental and water management permit processes concerning the company’s entire operations and the KL1 side rock area, on which the Supreme Administrative Court issued its decision on 12 February 2026 (KHO 366/2026 and 367/2026). The changes made to the decisions of the Vaasa Administrative Court as a result of Terrafame’s appeals, enable the company to implement its new strategy and develop its operations as planned. The decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court brought the nearly ten-year-long permit process to a close.
Case published 20.2.2026