4.10.2023

Commission issues new guidance on enhanced due diligence against sanctions circumvention

A new guidance note by the Commission helps operators in the European Union to identify sanctions circumvention and assess the related risks. The note presents an overview of aspects to consider when carrying out due diligence.

In response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the European Union has imposed vast restrictive measures against Russia and Belarus. Given the scale of the sanctions, Russia has tried to circumvent these measures, for example by using complex financial schemes or falsifying the nature of origin of the goods traded. There is therefore an increased risk that EU operators unknowingly facilitate prohibited activities involving Russia which possibly violate EU regulations. EU operators have a duty to comply with sanctions regulations and to carry out due diligence when trading with third countries in order to reduce the risk of sanctions circumvention. It is prohibited to knowingly and intentionally participate in activities which have the effect or object of circumventing prohibitions laid down in Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

Identifying sanctions circumvention

In September, the European Commission published a new guidance note for EU operators to help them identify and assess possible risks of sanctions circumvention. The guidance is intended as a practical guide, not an exhaustive document, and it aims to provide main points of consideration for enhanced due diligence. It currently focuses on export-related sanctions, but the recommended due diligence measures will be updated as new ways of circumventing sanctions emerge. The guidance emphasises that risk assessments should be updated regularly, and personnel should be trained on the issues related to sanctions.

The guidance contains a list of good practices which seek to ensure that business partners are identified and verified, abnormalities in the flows of money and routes of goods are noticed, and attention is paid to the nature of goods. In particular, threats and vulnerabilities arise for EU operators who manufacture or transport, semiconductor devices, for example, or other high-priority battlefield items. The Commission has published lists of sanctioned high-priority battlefield items and economically critical goods to support EU operators in their due diligence and effective compliance with EU sanctions regime.

Good practices and red flags

As for the implementation of enhanced due diligence, the guidance contains some good practices to address the most common typologies of sanctions circumvention. Particular attention should be given to the possibility of diversion to or from Russia via third countries. When exporting goods subject to restrictions, all EU operators should 1) include contractual clauses with their third-country business partners prohibiting re-exports of the items to Russia and Belarus and 2) possibly include ex post verifications. If sanctioned items are exported further due to insufficient due diligence, it may constitute a violation of EU sanctions law. Additional vigilance is also required when transactions rely on correspondent accounts.

The guidance also contains a list of circumvention red flags related to business partners and customers. Possible signs of circumvention are, for example, indirect transactions, new customers in ’circumvention hubs’ and complex corporate structures. If any of the red flags come up in the course of general due diligence, a deeper screening is required.

The guidance can be read in full here.

Latest references

We advised the shareholders of Suomen Autohuolto Oy in connection with the sale of the company’s entire share capital, to SAKA Finland Group Oy. Suomen Autohuolto Group is one of Finland’s largest companies specializing in brand-specific automotive maintenance and has locations in Oulu, Tampere, and from July, also in Järvenpää. The transaction is subject to final approval by the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority (KKV).
Case published 26.6.2026
AI training
We delivered two tailor-made AI workshops for the lawyers at the Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke). We discussed the AI revolution and its impact on lawyers’ ways of thinking and working, and left the participants with practical solutions for enhancing and streamlining their work with Legora. Our AI-specialist lawyers prepared use cases tailored to Luke and the needs of public administration, which Luke received for its own use following the workshops. These use cases covered topics such as: utilising legal sources and the organisation’s own data to maximise AI results building and leveraging AI workflows AI-enhanced contract drafting based on a large volume of documents. The workshops sparked wide-ranging discussion on the role and benefits of AI in legal work. Participants appreciated how clearly and comprehensively our experts were able to present the nature and benefits of AI specifically within a legal context. ‘The workshops provided excellent support for Luke’s goal of leveraging AI responsibly and gave us concrete and ready-to-use practical takeaways,’ says Hannu Laitinen, Luke’s Senior Vice President, Administrative Affairs.
Case published 26.6.2026
We successfully represented a Finnish construction management consultancy and a safety coordinator employed by the company in criminal proceedings concerning an alleged occupational safety and health offence. The prosecutor sought a penalty for an alleged breach of occupational safety regulations. The charge arose from a fall accident at a construction site where our client acted as the safety coordinator appointed by the developer. We assessed the scope of the safety coordinator’s duties in relation to the responsibilities of the main contractor, as well as how our client had fulfilled their obligations in practice. We demonstrated that our client had acted with due care and in full compliance with their duties throughout the planning, preparation and execution of the construction project. The District Court of Eastern Uusimaa dismissed the charge against our client. The Court held that our client, in their capacity as safety coordinator, had duly fulfilled the occupational safety obligations incumbent on the developer during the planning and preparation phases of the construction project and had not been aware of the fall protection deficiency identified at the site. The judgment is final insofar as our client is concerned.
Case published 22.6.2026
We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its financial management services business to Rantalainen as part of its strategic focus on fully concentrating on the delivery of business applications as well as data and AI solutions. As a result of the transaction, customer contracts related to financial management services and 65 experts working in these services will transfer to Rantalainen. The transaction will be carried out as a transfer of business, and the experts will move to the new owner as existing employees. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere.
Case published 12.6.2026