3.6.2021

From Remote to Hybrid Work – What Do Employers Need to Know?

Last spring, many Finns followed authority recommendations and started working from home rather than commuting to the office.  The amount of remote work skyrocketed almost overnight, particularly in consultant and expert work.

As organisations are now beginning to transition back to normal, remote work will no longer be based on emergency circumstances and authority recommendations. The current transition involves a number of noteworthy employment law issues that employers should be aware of.

Agreeing on Remote Work

Remote work is flexible work that is done either full time or part time outside the actual workplace and is based on voluntary, agreed rules. Remote work is subject to the same employment law regulations as work done traditionally at the workplace.

Voluntary remote work does not necessarily require a separate employment agreement. However, we recommend that employers draft written remote work instructions, because in employment relationships of over one month, the employer has a statutory obligation to report the key terms of employment.

Written instructions help avoid ambiguity about the terms of employment. In a dispute, ambiguity is easily interpreted to the detriment of the employer. If unwritten practices continue for a long time, they could become established terms of the employment relationship, and the employer will no longer be able to unilaterally change them.

Remote work instructions should cover at least the following matters:

Can Employees Be Obligated to Work Remotely?

When talking about remote work, the question sometimes arises of whether employers can obligate their employees to work remotely. As a rule, the place of employment agreed in the employment agreement is binding on the employer with respect to remote work. too. 

This means that the employer cannot in normal circumstances unilaterally obligate an employee to work remotely unless this has been agreed in the employment agreement. An exception to this could be if the employer decides to give up a fixed place of business entirely.

This could create production-related grounds referred to in section 7(3) of the Employment Contracts Act. The plan for transitioning to remote work and giving up a fixed place of business would have to be discussed in co-operation negotiations and could be adopted by complying with notice periods.

Remote Work and Equal Treatment

Employers have an obligation to treat their employees equally unless there is an acceptable cause for different treatment based on the duties and position of the employees. Remote work rules and instructions can be different for employees in different positions as long as there are objective and acceptable reasons for different treatment.

Acceptable reasons can include the contents and nature of work duties as well as the kind of work performance.

The employer can also set limits on remote work. For example, the employer can require that there must always be a certain number of employees at the workplace or forbid remote work if an employee refuses to comply with the employer’s remote work instructions.

Remote Work Abroad

Employers are under no obligation to allow remote work from abroad. Employers are entitled to require that their employees work remotely from a location where they are able to return to the workplace within a specified time limit. The employer is also entitled to require that work duties are performed during regular working hours or flexible working hours. Time zone differences do not justify deviating from agreed working hours.

Temporarily working from abroad has no impact on the fact that Finnish employment law is applied to the employment relationship. When remote work from abroad is longer in duration, the employer must determine which country’s employment law is applied to the employment relationship.

It is also extremely important for both the employer and employee to find out in advance how the employee’s social security is determined while working abroad, i.e. which country’s social security provisions apply to the remote work.

Occupational Safety and Health Act and Coping with Work

In remote work, the employer’s ability to supervise employment relationships and employee workloads is limited. This highlights the employee’s own responsibility to ensure, for example, sufficient rest time. The employer should also use, for example, surveys and discussions to remind employees to look after their wellbeing.

The employment accidents insurance taken out by the employer also applies to remote work, but in remote work it is more tied to the workspace than at the actual workplace. This is important to keep in mind and, if necessary, the employer and employee should supplement the statutory accident insurance with a voluntary insurance policy.

Latest references

We acted as Finnish law legal adviser to the lenders and the export credit agencies in connection with the EUR 514.4 million green project financing for the development and construction of Easpring Finland New Materials Oy’s cathode active material (CAM) manufacturing plant in Kotka, Finland. The borrower, Easpring Finland New Materials Oy, is a joint venture owned by Beijing Easpring Material Technology, Finnish Minerals Group and LG Energy Solution. The financing was provided by six international commercial banks, with Société Générale acting as financial adviser and mandated lead arranger together with Natixis as co-mandated lead arranger, and DNB, ICBC, ING and Standard Chartered participating as lenders, with support from the export credit agencies Finnvera and Sinosure. The project represents a significant milestone for Finland and the European battery value chain by strengthening Europe’s domestic supply of cathode active materials, a key component in lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles and energy storage applications. Once the first phase of the project is operational, the Kotka facility is expected to produce approximately 60,000 tonnes of cathode active material annually, making it one of the largest CAM production plants in Europe and supplying leading battery manufacturers across Europe. 
Case published 21.7.2026
We acted as Finnish legal advisor to Delta Capacity in connection with its acquisition of the ready-to-build Karppio battery energy storage system (BESS) project from Helios Nordic Energy. The acquisition was made and the project will be implemented together with Strioga Family Foundation. The Karppio BESS project is located in Teuva, Finland, and has a capacity of 125 MW / 300 MWh. Delta Capacity will lead the remaining development of the project through to commissioning, planned for 2027, and will serve as long-term asset manager. Delta Capacity is a Swiss-based developer of utility scale battery storage systems. The acquisition adds to Delta Capacity’s growing Nordic portfolio. 
Case published 20.7.2026
We advised Swedbank AB (publ) on the refinancing of a large Finnish retail real estate portfolio owned by Trophi’s Finnish subsidiaries. Trophi is the leading Nordic real estate company focusing on grocery anchored retail properties, with 278 properties across Sweden and Finland. Finland is a market that continues to develop and is also strategically important for Trophi, accounting for approximately 30% of Trophi’s letting and property value.
Case published 17.7.2026
We are acting as Finnish legal advisor to HANZA in connection with its acquisition of Fortaco Finland’s heavy mechanics and assembly business. The transaction is structured as a combined asset and share acquisition and includes Fortaco Finland’s heavy mechanics and assembly operations in Finland, as well as shares in two Estonian and two Polish subsidiaries. The transaction is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2026, subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Founded in 2008, HANZA is a Swedish mechanical engineering and electronics contract manufacturing company listed on the Nasdaq Stockholm main list. HANZA has approximately 5,000 employees and annual sales of SEK 10 billion. We advise HANZA on this transaction in collaboration with the Swedish law firm Lindahl.
Case published 15.7.2026