3.6.2021

From Remote to Hybrid Work – What Do Employers Need to Know?

Last spring, many Finns followed authority recommendations and started working from home rather than commuting to the office.  The amount of remote work skyrocketed almost overnight, particularly in consultant and expert work.

As organisations are now beginning to transition back to normal, remote work will no longer be based on emergency circumstances and authority recommendations. The current transition involves a number of noteworthy employment law issues that employers should be aware of.

Agreeing on Remote Work

Remote work is flexible work that is done either full time or part time outside the actual workplace and is based on voluntary, agreed rules. Remote work is subject to the same employment law regulations as work done traditionally at the workplace.

Voluntary remote work does not necessarily require a separate employment agreement. However, we recommend that employers draft written remote work instructions, because in employment relationships of over one month, the employer has a statutory obligation to report the key terms of employment.

Written instructions help avoid ambiguity about the terms of employment. In a dispute, ambiguity is easily interpreted to the detriment of the employer. If unwritten practices continue for a long time, they could become established terms of the employment relationship, and the employer will no longer be able to unilaterally change them.

Remote work instructions should cover at least the following matters:

Can Employees Be Obligated to Work Remotely?

When talking about remote work, the question sometimes arises of whether employers can obligate their employees to work remotely. As a rule, the place of employment agreed in the employment agreement is binding on the employer with respect to remote work. too. 

This means that the employer cannot in normal circumstances unilaterally obligate an employee to work remotely unless this has been agreed in the employment agreement. An exception to this could be if the employer decides to give up a fixed place of business entirely.

This could create production-related grounds referred to in section 7(3) of the Employment Contracts Act. The plan for transitioning to remote work and giving up a fixed place of business would have to be discussed in co-operation negotiations and could be adopted by complying with notice periods.

Remote Work and Equal Treatment

Employers have an obligation to treat their employees equally unless there is an acceptable cause for different treatment based on the duties and position of the employees. Remote work rules and instructions can be different for employees in different positions as long as there are objective and acceptable reasons for different treatment.

Acceptable reasons can include the contents and nature of work duties as well as the kind of work performance.

The employer can also set limits on remote work. For example, the employer can require that there must always be a certain number of employees at the workplace or forbid remote work if an employee refuses to comply with the employer’s remote work instructions.

Remote Work Abroad

Employers are under no obligation to allow remote work from abroad. Employers are entitled to require that their employees work remotely from a location where they are able to return to the workplace within a specified time limit. The employer is also entitled to require that work duties are performed during regular working hours or flexible working hours. Time zone differences do not justify deviating from agreed working hours.

Temporarily working from abroad has no impact on the fact that Finnish employment law is applied to the employment relationship. When remote work from abroad is longer in duration, the employer must determine which country’s employment law is applied to the employment relationship.

It is also extremely important for both the employer and employee to find out in advance how the employee’s social security is determined while working abroad, i.e. which country’s social security provisions apply to the remote work.

Occupational Safety and Health Act and Coping with Work

In remote work, the employer’s ability to supervise employment relationships and employee workloads is limited. This highlights the employee’s own responsibility to ensure, for example, sufficient rest time. The employer should also use, for example, surveys and discussions to remind employees to look after their wellbeing.

The employment accidents insurance taken out by the employer also applies to remote work, but in remote work it is more tied to the workspace than at the actual workplace. This is important to keep in mind and, if necessary, the employer and employee should supplement the statutory accident insurance with a voluntary insurance policy.

Latest references

We acted as legal adviser to Banyan Software on its acquisition of Carus Ferry, a Finland-based provider of reservation, check-in and port operations software for ferry and passenger shipping operators. The acquisition further strengthens Banyan Software’s presence in the Nordic region while providing Carus with a long-term partner to support its continued growth and development. Carus was founded in 1998 and is headquartered in Mariehamn on the Åland Islands, Finland. The company develops mission-critical software for ferry, cruise and passenger shipping operators, covering the full passenger journey from booking and ticketing to capacity management, check-in and boarding. Carus also provides port automation, onboard sales systems and business information tools. The company serves approximately 30 operators across four continents and is the largest vendor by customer count in ferry reservation and departure control. Banyan Software is an acquirer and long-term operator of mission-critical software businesses serving specialised industries. Founded in 2016, Banyan follows a buy-and-hold-for-life approach and supports the long-term growth and development of its portfolio companies. Banyan operates more than 130 portfolio companies across North and South America, the United Kingdom, Europe and APAC. Following the acquisition of Carus, Banyan operates three businesses in the Nordic region.
Case published 20.10.2026
We successfully represented a Finnish construction management consultancy and a safety coordinator employed by the company in criminal proceedings concerning an alleged occupational safety and health offence. The prosecutor sought a penalty for an alleged breach of occupational safety regulations. The charge arose from a fall accident at a construction site where our client acted as the safety coordinator appointed by the developer. We assessed the scope of the safety coordinator’s duties in relation to the responsibilities of the main contractor, as well as how our client had fulfilled their obligations in practice. We demonstrated that our client had acted with due care and in full compliance with their duties throughout the planning, preparation and execution of the construction project. The District Court of Eastern Uusimaa dismissed the charge against our client. The Court held that our client, in their capacity as safety coordinator, had duly fulfilled the occupational safety obligations incumbent on the developer during the planning and preparation phases of the construction project and had not been aware of the fall protection deficiency identified at the site. The judgment is final insofar as our client is concerned.
Case published 22.6.2026
We advised G&W Electric with its acquisition of Safegrid Oy, a leading provider of intelligent grid monitoring solutions based in Finland. The acquisition accelerates G&W Electric’s long-term strategy to integrate intelligent monitoring and predictive analytics into its power distribution portfolio, strengthening its offering to utility customers worldwide. Founded in 1905 and headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois, G&W Electric is a global leader in innovative power grid solutions, with a presence in over 100 countries. The company is known for advanced load and fault interrupting switches, reclosers, sensors, system protection equipment, power grid automation, intelligent grid monitoring, and transmission and distribution cable accessories. Safegrid is a Finnish technology company headquartered in Espoo, Finland. The company develops the Intelligent Grid System®, a grid monitoring solution that combines instant-on wireless sensors with advanced analytics to deliver real-time insight into grid conditions, enabling utilities to identify emerging issues, anticipate failures, and reduce outage duration across medium and high voltage distribution and transmission networks.
Case published 8.5.2026
We advised Aurevia Oy, a portfolio company of French private equity sponsor Mérieux Equity Partners, in a strategic reorganisation that involved splitting Aurevia and its parent companies into two independent groups of companies and reorganisation of its existing debt-financing arrangements. Following the reorganisation, the newly formed Aurevia continues as a leading provider of Contract Research Organization (CRO) and Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs (QARA) services, while the newly formed Labquality focuses on delivering External Quality Assessment (EQA) services. Aurevia serves operators in the medical devices, in vitro diagnostics and pharmaceutical sectors. Labquality’s customers include clinical laboratories and social and healthcare organisations. The reorganisation positions Aurevia and Labquality to allocate investments more effectively, accelerate growth within their respective customer segments, and respond to evolving market and client needs. The transaction was implemented through multiple parallel demergers and required comprehensive legal and tax structuring across several jurisdictions. Our team supported Aurevia throughout the planning and implementation phases, covering corporate, tax, employment law, and regulatory matters, as well as the optimisation of each group’s financing structure.
Case published 7.4.2026