Our Tax & Structuring service was reinforced at the end of March when Senior Associate Emmi Karvinen returned to Castrén & Snellman after working elsewhere for a few years.
12.4.2023
Emmi Karvinen, expert in owner-entrepreneur taxation, to develop a service package for family businesses
Related services
With a versatile career in tax law and a focus on family-owned businesses, Emmi advises our clients particularly on matters related to taxation and wealth management. Emmi has extensive experience in the taxation of family-owned businesses and owner-entrepreneurs, and she is well-versed in mergers and acquisitions, structuring and carrying out family business successions as well as tax litigation matters.
In her new role, Emmi focuses on tax matters and develops a new service package aimed at family-owned businesses.
‘Emmi is familiar with the day-to-day business of both SMEs and family-owned businesses. As a generalist with knowledge of various legal fields, she is a reliable advisor for our clients and an excellent addition to our already strong team. It’s great to have Emmi back on the team,’ says Partner Mikko Alakare, Head of Tax & Structuring.
Emmi joining the C&S Tax & Structuring practice answers the need to tackle the challenges brought on by the ever changing and increasingly complex regulation of the Finnish business scene. By bringing to the table experts in ownership and entrepreneurship taxation, Castrén & Snellman can provide its clients with a straight-forward and seamless one-stop way to deal with tax issues related to ownership, entrepreneurship and business operations.
After graduating as a Master of Laws from the University of Helsinki, Emmi worked at Castrén & Snellman, among others. Two years ago she became a legal counsel at Fundu, where her responsibilities included providing legal advice on various matters ranging from dispute resolution to risk management.
‘I was very excited to return to Castrén & Snellman! There are a lot of familiar faces, and it is great to work together again and to share the knowledge I gained as an in-house lawyer,’ says Emmi.
Economic adjustments may lead to new regulations
Emmi started in her new role in the midst of parliamentary elections. She anticipates that in the new electoral period, the central government will deal with many questions affecting the operating environment of family businesses.
‘The State is in a difficult economic situation, and we will likely see economic adjustments in one form or another. Before the election, the Ministry of Finance published its own budget cut proposal. The Ministry’s proposals are rather contradictory with the hopes and needs of entrepreneurs – for example, increasing the dividend tax of private companies would weaken the position of the owner-entrepreneurs of SMEs,’ Emmi states.
Many unresolved questions remain as the government negotiations get underway.
‘Companies are carefully monitoring the changes proposed by the new Government, as these changes could radically affect their operating environment,’ says Emmi.
Regulation in need of simplification and predictability
Regulatory matters related to company succession are particularly important to family-owned businesses in light of business continuity and predictability. Regulation has increased over time, and entrepreneurs consider the system to be overly complicated.
‘The jungle of regulations has become increasingly dense in recent years: regulation has increased and it is increasingly complex in nature. This is already affecting succession of family businesses and the related tax matters.’
The complex and ever-changing operating environment weakens the businesses’ ability to operate and may hinder expansion into international markets, for example. In her work, Emmi has witnessed the increasing need for legal advice when businesses try to solve legal issues. In her view, it is key that the predictability of taxation does not suffer in a way that would make it more difficult for companies and their owners to plan for the future.
‘It would be important to look at the regulatory environment surrounding privately owned companies and their owners as a whole. The day-to-day business of companies has changed immensely in only a few years, and it is important to consider different ways to support Finnish businesses. What has worked before might not work anymore,’ says Emmi.
Latest news
Latest references
VR – Supreme Court decision clarifies working time practices
We successfully represented VR Group before the Supreme Court in a case concerning the meal break practice of commuter train drivers. On 6 February 2026, the Supreme Court ruled in VR’s favour (decision KKO:2026:12), confirming that VR had the right to amend the commuter train drivers’ meal break practice in 2021 by rendering the break unpaid in accordance with the applicable collective agreement. This decision clarifies the interpretation of collective agreements and employment legislation as well as the limits of the employer’s right to direct work. Over 250 commuter train drivers challenged the unpaid meal break practice which VR introduced in April 2021. Before the change, meal breaks had a long history of being paid. The change was based on the train drivers’ collective agreement, which allows for meal breaks to be organised either as paid or unpaid time. The Supreme Court ruled that the scheduling and managing of breaks falls within the core area of the employer’s right to direct work. This increases the threshold for an established practice becoming a binding condition for the parties. Merely following a practice consistently and over a long period of time does not make the practice binding; instead, the employer’s intent to commit to the practice must be clearly evident from the employer’s conduct or other circumstances. As both alternatives – paid and unpaid – for organising meal breaks had been retained in the collective agreement despite other amendments over the years, it could not be considered that VR had intended to commit to the paid break practice and waive its right to direct work as regards break scheduling. It was also significant that the employment contracts explicitly referred only to the collective agreement as regards working time. The Supreme Court deemed that the employees’ paid meal break was not an established term of employment and that VR was entitled to change the practice based on the collective agreement. The employer had the right, by virtue of its right to direct work, to unilaterally change the meal break practice by choosing to apply the other arrangement permitted by the collective agreement.
Case published 3.3.2026
CapMan Growth – Investment in Kuntokeskus Liikku
We are assisting CapMan Growth in its significant investment in Kuntokeskus Liikku, a Finnish gym chain known for its high-quality self-service facilities and excellent value for money. The investment will further strengthen Liikku’s position as a market leader and support the continued execution of its growth strategy. Liikku is one of Finland’s leading fitness chains, with more than 70 locations across the country serving nearly 90,000 members. The company’s concept is to offer high-quality self-service gyms at an exceptionally competitive price point which, combined with strong operational efficiency, provides a solid foundation for profitable growth. The company’s main shareholder is COR Group, a long-time partner of CapMan Growth, and a Finnish health and wellness conglomerate known for active ownership and long-term value creation. CapMan Growth is a leading Finnish growth investor that makes significant investments in entrepreneur-led growth companies with a turnover of €10–200 million. CapMan Growth is part of CapMan, which is a leading Nordic private equity investor engaged in active value creation work. CapMan has been listed on the Helsinki Stock Exchange since 2001.
Case published 27.2.2026
Terrafame – Environmental and water management permit processes concerning the company’s entire operations and the KL1 side rock area
Castrén & Snellman successfully assisted Terrafame Ltd in environmental and water management permit processes concerning the company’s entire operations and the KL1 side rock area, on which the Supreme Administrative Court issued its decision on 12 February 2026 (KHO 366/2026 and 367/2026). The changes made to the decisions of the Vaasa Administrative Court as a result of Terrafame’s appeals, enable the company to implement its new strategy and develop its operations as planned. The decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court brought the nearly ten-year-long permit process to a close.
Case published 20.2.2026
Plastep – Sale of share capital
We advised Plastep Oy and its shareholders in the sale of the entire share capital of the company to FinnProfiles Oy. The acquisition strengthens FinnProfiles’ position as a Nordic expert in sealing and insulation solutions and expands the company’s expertise in the manufacture of plastic products and technical components. Plastep, founded in 2001 and based in South Savo, is a contract manufacturer specialising in the design and production of demanding and technical plastic components, with a turnover of EUR 6.5 million.
Case published 18.2.2026