9.1.2017

Accounting Act Reform: Large Corporations to Report Non-Financial Information

Related services

The Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on the disclosure of non-financial information has been implemented via amendments to the Finnish Accounting Act. In this article I cover the key amendments made to the Accounting Act. The amended act requires that affected undertakings make the first report in 2018, which will cover information on the year 2017.

What Companies Will be Affected?

According to the directive, the obligation to report non-financial information will apply to large public interest entities with more than 500 employees during the financial period. If an entity fulfils these three criteria it will have to draft a report. You can use the checklist below to easily check whether the company or entity you represent falls under the new obligation.

What Information Needs to be Reported?

There are already 150 Finnish companies that publish annual corporate responsibility reports, even though they have not previously been legally obligated to do so. These companies will have to check that their existing reporting and the underlying systems cover the subjects required by the amendment. Companies that have not previously published corporate responsibility reports, but that are now obligated to report non-financial information, have much more work ahead of them.

The report must include information on environmental matters, social and employee-related matters, respect for human rights, anti-corruption and bribery matters. The amended law requires the report to include at least the following:

Undertakings can report the information required by the amendment either in their annual report or separately, for example, in a corporate responsibility report. It should be noted that it is not necessary to certify the report. However, the auditor must check that the report has been published and that the information in the report is in line with the information in the financial statements.

The Effects of the Amendment Extend to Companies outside its Direct Scope

Finland’s largest companies are already used to drafting corporate responsibility reports. Their existing reporting practices will make it easier to adapt to the new regulations. However, these companies, too, will have to ensure that the matters required by the amendment and their underlying processes are in order for the first statutory reporting cycle.

Companies falling outside the scope of the new obligations, for their part, must now take into account that large corporations will be required to report non-financial information on their business relationships, for example, to provide information on effect in their supply chain. Companies should be prepared for large companies to send an increasing number requests for information to their subcontractors due to the amendment.

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy. 
Case published 9.9.2026