What if a legal service or document was easy to read, visualised and practical? If the language was understandable—for everyone? Legalese was clarified and illustrated, and the end-user was at the heart of the design?
As the legal and technological landscape has become more complex, interest in legal design has grown. Legal design has been a topic of discussion among experts around the world for some time, but now the public’s attention has turned to user-centredness in a new way in Finland too – so much so that people are already demanding it. The legal profession is faced with expectations of comprehensibility, transparency and consideration of the end-user’s point of view. Fortunately, thanks to legal design, we are now in a position to meet these expectations.
So what is legal design?
At first glance, legal design may seem like nothing more than pretty pictures and icons pasted on top of a document containing the original jargon. But legal design is much more than that, although the use of visuals is undoubtedly an important part of it. It is therefore not just a moment of decorating a Christmas tree, but a journey undertaken by a multidisciplinary team from the first meeting with a client to the end of the assignment.
The starting point for a legal design project is to identify for whom and for what purpose the service or document is being designed. Legal design benefits both private and public sector organisations. The end-user may be within the organisation, or it may be our client’s customer, and the design itself can be information, product, service, organisational or system design. For example, a privacy policy, a non-disclosure agreement or even a website dealing with a legal process can be designed. The subject matter and the way in which the final product is implemented can therefore vary, as each project is unique.
One of the purposes of legal design is to facilitate collaboration between experts and clients, so it benefits us all: the better the understanding between the parties, the more meaningful the relationship is for both, and the better the result.
What can we find at the heart of a legal design project?
What all projects have in common, is a methodology that builds on an iterative, interactive and creative way of working and problem-solving. At its best, a legal design project is a fun journey that starts with identifying the end-user’s pain points or, in other words, by empathising. Empathy is one of the best tools in achieving a better legal product—after all, we are all human! By understanding what causes frustration and bumps in the road and by putting ourselves in the shoes of the end-user we gain valuable perspective.
The iterative working model is all about working on different versions in several stages, each one bringing us closer to a final product that could not have been created without the prototypes that preceded it. So indeed, it’s about trial and error! And the delivery of the final product to the client doesn’t mean the end of the assignment; the legal design project is sealed by a feedback session, an important moment to support learning and development for everyone concerned.
Legal design is not only about substance, but also about creating a new culture of collaboration and innovation. Legal design projects consist of a multi-professional team that makes the most of everyone’s skills and perspectives and constantly evolving tools. A successful project may therefore have involved, at its best, graphic designers, lawyers, coders, language experts, legal technology specialists and professionals in the client’s own field, such as economists.
How does legal design projects benefit our clients?
The aim of legal design is to create legal services and products that everyone can understand. However, it is not the answer to everything and should not be forced into every process. For example, collaboration between lawyers is sometimes best achieved through approaches and concepts specific to the profession.
But what about those without a legal background? Those who need our legal advice and who should understand what they are committing to—the end-users? Those who are not familiar with the law often perceive it as a code language that only lawyers can understand (and it is sometimes challenging for them too). It is not necessarily just a question of comprehensibility. In addition to a lack of knowledge, many people do not have the energy to deal with the obscure contracts, processes and inhumanly long procedures. From the point of view of the function of the legal system, this is not appropriate, is it?
When done well, legal design saves time, improves the customer experience and reduces the number of errors in both documents and their interpretation. This can even save parties from litigation, which in turn saves money! Not to mention the fact that a well-designed document is much more pleasant to read as the reader is not overloaded with information. There are many ways in which visualisation can be used alongside linguistic design itself. User-centricity is taken into account through summarisation, readability and perception. Information is balanced and a hierarchy is sought in the document.
Through legal design, we want to support lawyers in the practice of law, translate complex legalese into practicalities for the end-user, and enable creative and effective solutions for our clients. The broader goal is to improve everyone’s understanding of the rules and systems that apply to them so that both firms and their clients can navigate the legal system strategically and wisely.
Why should legal design be in every lawyer’s toolbox?
Legal design is a set of many mindsets and methodologies. In a lawyer’s toolbox, it can therefore be a productive process, leading to the launch of a new service, or a research method for generating data and insight on a particular topic. The implementation of design thinking in law makes our field more multidimensional and more human, giving us a more ambitious and creative way to illustrate things and to resolve the confusion, frustration and friction that law can generate.
At Castrén & Snellman, we implement legal design through projects, training for clients and staff workshops. We have formed a multi-professional team where everyone brings their own vision to agile projects. Internally, we use legal design to create different types of documents. Among other things, we have designed legal model documents, information security guidelines and a legal technology interface called Signe.
Signe is a contract tool that not only provides our clients with automated documents but also with legal design. With Signe, our clients can have automated contracts in a single, standardised and designed format. Legal tech and legal design should therefore not be seen as separate concepts, but as complementary ones.
In legal design, we see an incredible potential to take law to a new level. There is a lot to design, from privacy policies, user terms and conditions, and non-disclosure agreements to various legal interfaces and systems. There are many uses for legal design, so for lawyers, it’s a world of possibilities! A world that takes us towards a more understandable legal world where we at Castrén & Snellman want to support our clients—with a focus on user-centricity.
Latest insights
Article published 13.5.2026 – Venture Capital & Minority Investments
Newly launched Series Seed 4.0 is a comprehensive standard seed financing documentation for the Finnish market
Article published 8.5.2026 – Environment, Energy & Green Transition
Reform of Finland’s land use legislation – key takeaways for project developers
Article published 28.4.2026 – Private M&A
Unlocking value in carve-outs – Why integration planning deserves top priority in every carve-out
Article published 30.3.2026 – Competition & Procurement
Finnish FDI screening under reform — Update following the stakeholder consultation
Jarno Tanhuanpää, Tuomas Honkinen & Jussi Mäkikangas
Tarja Pirinen, Marius af Schultén & Joel Aartolahti
Benjamin Bade, Maiju Mäkinen & Samuli Salminen
Kiti Karvinen, Johanna Kyllöinen & Joachim Wik
Latest references
Finnish Construction Management Consultancy — District Court Dismisses charge in occupational safety offence case concerning a safety coordinator
We successfully represented a Finnish construction management consultancy and a safety coordinator employed by the company in criminal proceedings concerning an alleged occupational safety and health offence. The prosecutor sought a penalty for an alleged breach of occupational safety regulations. The charge arose from a fall accident at a construction site where our client acted as the safety coordinator appointed by the developer. We assessed the scope of the safety coordinator’s duties in relation to the responsibilities of the main contractor, as well as how our client had fulfilled their obligations in practice. We demonstrated that our client had acted with due care and in full compliance with their duties throughout the planning, preparation and execution of the construction project. The District Court of Eastern Uusimaa dismissed the charge against our client. The Court held that our client, in their capacity as safety coordinator, had duly fulfilled the occupational safety obligations incumbent on the developer during the planning and preparation phases of the construction project and had not been aware of the fall protection deficiency identified at the site. The judgment is final insofar as our client is concerned.
Case published 22.6.2026
Efima – Sale of financial management services business
We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its financial management services business to Rantalainen as part of its strategic focus on fully concentrating on the delivery of business applications as well as data and AI solutions. As a result of the transaction, customer contracts related to financial management services and 65 experts working in these services will transfer to Rantalainen. The transaction will be carried out as a transfer of business, and the experts will move to the new owner as existing employees. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere.
Case published 12.6.2026
Ugly Duckling Ventures – EUR 6.5 million funding round of Skyfora
We advised lead investor Ugly Duckling Ventures on the EUR 6.5 million funding round of Skyfora. The round also included Eviny Ventures, LUMO Labs and EIC Fund, alongside non-dilutive funding from Business Finland. The investment will support the commercial scale-up of Skyfora’s weather intelligence solutions, the expansion of partnerships with telecom operators, forecasting providers and meteorological institutions, and the continued growth of the team. Skyfora is a Finnish company developing high-resolution weather data solutions using patented technology that extracts atmospheric data from GNSS receivers embedded in existing infrastructure, such as telecom networks. By unlocking previously untapped data sources, Skyfora enables the next generation of AI-driven weather forecasting and supports improved decision-making across weather-sensitive industries. Ugly Duckling Ventures is a Copenhagen-based venture capital firm focused on early-stage Nordic B2B technology companies, with an emphasis on medtech, resilience tech and business services.
Case published 10.6.2026
General Atlantic – ICEYE’s EUR 1 Billion Series F Funding Round
We advised General Atlantic as the lead investor on ICEYE’s EUR 1 billion series F funding round, valuing the company at over EUR 10 billion. ICEYE raised EUR 450 million (USD 520 million) in a primary Series F funding round led by General Atlantic. Additional investors included Solidium, Tesi, Varma, Ilmarinen, Lifeline Ventures, Nokia, Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) and TCV. Together with a secondary placement, the total fundraising exceeds EUR 1 billion. ICEYE is the world leader in sovereign intelligence from space, providing continuous monitoring capabilities to detect and respond to changes in any location on Earth. The company operates the world’s largest and most advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar satellite constellation. General Atlantic is a leading global investor with more than four and a half decades of experience providing capital and strategic support for over 885 companies throughout its history. As of March 31, 2026, General Atlantic manages approximately USD 126 billion in assets across its investment strategies. We advised General Atlantic on this transaction in collaboration with the international law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.
Case published 9.6.2026