27.4.2017

Get Investors into the Market – Top Tips from Recent IPOs

The Finnish IPO market is in a clear upward trend, as shown by the graph published by Kauppalehti, the leading Finnish business news publication. In fact, the Nordic countries are currently leading global IPO statistics and have even surpassed the London and Frankfurt stock exchanges.

Last autumn’s most significant event in the Finnish capital markets was the listing of the Finnish telecommunications group DNA, the largest Finnish IPO of the decade. Other Finnish companies that have recently made an initial public offering include Lehto Group, Vincit, Pihlajalinna and Suomen Hoivatilat, with Fondia and Next Games being the newest entrants to the list.

The promising market situation encouraged us to invite recently listed companies and IPO advisors to a workshop to share their experiences and thoughts last month. DNA’s Senior Vice President Christoffer von Schantz also gives valuable hints for companies seeking to list themselves (in Finnish only). We have collected some of the best points both from the workshop and from Mr von Schantz here. 

 

Investors Want a Clear Strategy

It may be easier said than done to formulate a crystal clear business description and strategy in a form that is understandable to investors. However, a company seeking listing should have a clear understanding of its strategic strengths and what its business is ultimately all about. The company’s management should also be able to deliver this message convincingly to investors. It is absolutely worthwhile to go through this exercise; the materials created for the IPO will be of great value even after the listing.  

An Investor Story Inspires and Provides Credibility

The speakers in our workshop underlined the importance of having a consistent and credible investment story. It cannot be made up out of the blue, but must be based on hard facts.

A company seeking listing must win the attention of investors by providing not only a good investment theme – such as an up-trending sector – but also a lucrative business and capabilities that outshine the competition. What are the true needs that your company is responding to? And why should anyone be interested in investing in your company?

The IPO materials, such as the prospectus and marketing materials, must reproduce the investment story in a consistent and coherent manner. The company’s internal communication also plays a vital role in explaining the reasons for the listing to the company’s own personnel and other stakeholders, such as shareholders and customers.

The Business Must Keep Running Despite an Ongoing IPO

Going public is not a value per se. Following an IPO, a company can find its business on even more solid ground with improved financial success. Preparing a company for an IPO also involves creating capacity to meet the requirements imposed on listed companies. Success must originate with the company, but advisors can play a significant part in this success.

In a demanding listing project, responsibility for tasks must be clearly divided within the project team, and the personal chemistry must be right both in the company and in relation to the advisors. It is important to think in advance about how the company’s internal dynamics function. Operations cannot be stopped for the duration of the listing project, but must keep running as usual. Additionally, information must flow well both within the company and to the advisors.

A listing project should also be customised to support the company’s own brand image, and an IPO should not change the company’s own distinctive culture. For example, we have been happy to see that DNA has held on to its bold and straightforward identity now that it has become a listed company.

An IPO will always echo positively in the market. In DNA’s case, dreaming big was truly fruitful.

Latest references

We assisted eQ Community Properties Fund in the sale of two healthcare properties to a fund managed by Northern Horizon. The properties have a total floor area of approximately 3,500 square meters. The two properties are located in Espoo and Lahti. The Espoo asset was completed in 2018 and the Lahti asset was completed in 2023. Both assets are operated by Attendo, the leading care provider in the Nordic region.
Case published 9.5.2025
We successfully represented BMW in an exceptionally long dispute over whether the spare rims sold by the defendant and the hub caps included in them infringed BMW’s trademark and design rights. The Market Court found that the sign used by the defendant caused a likelihood of confusion with BMW’s trademarks. The defendant had used the sign on the hub caps and in the marketing of the hub caps and rims, leading the Market Court to find that the defendant had infringed BMW’s trademark rights. The defendant admitted to infringing BMW’s Community design but denied the related injunction claim. However, the Market Court found that there was no particular reason to refrain from issuing an injunction. The Market Court prohibited the defendant from continuing to infringe BMW’s trademarks and Community design and ordered the defendant to alter or destroy the products and marketing materials that infringed BMW’s rights. Furthermore, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay BMW EUR 70,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 80,000 in damages for the trademark infringements, as well as EUR 7,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 8,000 in damages for the design right infringement. The amounts can be considered exceptionally high in Finland. Additionally, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay a significant portion of BMW’s legal costs with interest on late payment. In its decision of 11 March 2025, the Supreme Court of Finland did not grant the defendant leave to appeal, and also decided that there was no need to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union. Thus, the Market Court’s judgements (MAO:494/18 ja 517/2023) are final. In addition to the main dispute, BMW demanded in a separate proceeding that one of the defendant’s trademark registrations be revoked. A total of three separate legal proceedings were conducted in the Market Court regarding the revocation. The defendant’s trademark registration was ultimately revoked.
Case published 9.5.2025
We are advising DNA Plc in brand protection and intellectual property enforcement matters globally. Our intellectual property team manages DNA’s global trademark portfolio, including registration, prosecution, opposition and enforcement. We also advise DNA in questions concerning consumer and marketing law, unfair competition, social media, domain names and cybersquatting. DNA Plc is one of Finland’s leading telecommunication companies. DNA offers connections, services and devices for homes and workplaces, contributing to the digitalisation of society. The company has approximately 3.7 million subscriptions in its fixed and mobile communications networks. In 2024, DNA’s total revenue was EUR 1,100 million, and the company employs about 1,600 people around Finland. DNA is part of Telenor Group.
Case published 7.5.2025
Castrén & Snellman’s Attorney Christer Svartström acted as the administrator in the restructuring proceedings of Foodiq Oy, which began on 11 March 2024. Foodiq is a unique future food focused company that develops and produces plant and milk-based products for both the private and public sectors. The company’s largest shareholder is a Swedish investment company focusing on FoodTec, Nicoya AB. The majority of creditors approved the draft restructuring programme in expedited proceedings after restructuring proceedings that lasted just under a year. The District Court of Helsinki affirmed the restructuring programme including the one-day payment programme on 10 March 2025 and appointed Attorney Christer Svartström as the supervisor of the programme. In cooperation with the parties, they found an effective and quick restructuring solution for the company, avoiding a long-term programme and allowing the company to focus on its core business. The restructuring programme was financed by investments made by the company’s investors. At the same time, the one-day programme provided a better outcome for creditors compared to a longer programme. The implementation of the restructuring programme ended successfully on 28 March 2025.
Case published 6.5.2025