As a part of the EU Gender Equality Strategy 2020–2025, the EU’s equality objective concerning the boards of listed companies is advancing after a 10-year break. One of the latest steps forward is the Directive that aims to balance the genders among directors of large listed companies. Approximately a third of board members in Finnish listed companies are women, which means that the Directive will increase the share of women on Finnish company boards as well.
12.12.2022
Gender quotas coming to boards of Finnish listed companies
The new Directive increases the share of women on boards of listed companies
On 22 November 2022, the European Parliament adopted a Directive that regulates improving the gender balance among directors of companies listed on stock exchange and aims to increase the share of women on company boards. Once the Directive has entered into force, it needs to be implemented into national legislation.
In the background of the gender balance regulation is the EU’s goal to support European economic growth and the competitiveness of companies as well as achieving true gender equality in the job market.
The regulation concerns all companies listed on stock exhange with at least 250 employees, and it targets the companies’ senior management, i.e. the board and, if applicable, the administrative council. The new regulation obliges companies to have a minimum of 40% of the under-represented sex among the non-executive directors by 30 June 2026. Member States can also decide to apply the minimum threshold to both executive and non-executive directors, in which case listed companies must strive for achieving a 33% presence of the under-represented sex among all directors. Nothing prevents Member States from adopting even tighter targets in order to achieve gender balance in company boards.
Member States must also lay down effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions that will apply in case the obligations under the Directive are not fulfilled. According to the EU, such sanctions could include fines or annulling appointments and elections.
Increased transparency in the selection procedure of board members
If a company does not achieve the gender balance targets, it must adapt how it selects its board members. The company must adopt fair and transparent processes for electing and appointing board members that are based on comparing the candidates against clear and neutral predetermined criteria. If the candidates are equally qualified, the candidate of the under-represented sex should be given priority.
Companies under the scope of the Directive must prepare yearly reports on the gender composition of their boards and, if they have not achieved their gender balance targets, on the actions with which they aim to achieve these targets.
What does this mean for Finland?
The current approach in Finland is to guide listed companies towards increasing the share of women on boards through recommendations without any specific quotas. The Finnish Corporate Governance Code for listed companies, published by the Securities Market Association, includes recommendations on the composition of the board with respect to gender balance and diversity. Pursuant to the recommendations, listed companies should also define and report the principles with which they promote board diversity. This means that listed companies are no strangers to reporting their targets for equal gender representation on the board, the means to achieve these targets and the progress they have made. The recommendations follow the principle of comply or explain, and there are no consequences for failing to comply with them.
The recommendations of the Corporate Governance Code have been effective. According to a report by the Finland Chamber of Commerce, women currently hold approximately 31% of board positions in Finnish listed companies, and in companies with a high market value their share is approximately 35%. According to the report, one half of Finnish listed companies already comply with the Directive’s gender balance requirement. Even though the share of women on the boards of Finnish listed companies is already high by international standards, the reform will inevitably lead to an increased share of women holding leadership positions in Finnish listed companies.
Latest insights
Article published 10.10.2024
Revolutionising legal services: Castrén & Snellman’s journey with AI integration
Article published 10.10.2024 – Data & Technology
New act on dual-use items entered into force in September – what companies need to know
Article published 4.10.2024 – Environment, Energy & Green Transition
Government proposal for an act on offshore wind power in the exclusive economic zone submitted to Parliament
Article published 2.10.2024 – Banking & Finance
Sustainable finance is vital for achieving the objectives of the green transition
Mia Ihamuotila
Kim Parviainen, Lauri Laatunen & Joakim Jaulimo
Marius af Schultén, Helinä Teittinen & Kanerva Sunila
Minna Korhonen & Lia Heasman
Latest references
WithSecure – Sale of open source data collection product and business
We advised WithSecure Oyj in the sale of its open source data collection product and business to Patria Oyj. The divested business combining software and services falls outside WithSecure’s current strategy. Through the sale, WithSecure sharpens its focus on the Elements portfolio. WithSecure is a global cyber security company (listed on NASDAQ OMX Helsinki) with more than 35 years of industry experience. WithSecure offers partners flexible commercial models, ensuring mutual success across the dynamic cyber security landscape. Patria is an international company in the defence and security industry offering defence, security and aviation life cycle support services and technology solutions. As a result of the transaction, Patria will open a new office in Oulu and 10 WithSecure experts currently working in the business area will join Patria.
Case published 30.9.2024
A. Ahlström – ESG advisory and corporate sustainability due diligence process planning
We advised A. Ahlström in establishing a corporate sustainability due diligence process plan which incorporates best practices and tailored solutions based on our expertise within relevant business sectors. Our comprehensive ESG offering also included tailored training for members of the investment team and management team and the board of directors of several portfolio companies. ‘The ESG team at Castrén & Snellman provided us with legal and practical advice around the ESG regulatory tsunami that we need to incorporate in our ESG work,’ comments Camilla Sågbom, Director, Sustainability and Communications, at A. Ahlström Oy. A. Ahlström is a family-owned industrial company, developing leading global specialist positions in Forest & Fiber and Environmental technology sectors.
Case published 5.9.2024
Vapaus Bikes Finland – Series A funding round
We represented Vapaus Bikes Finland Oy, a company offering employee benefit bikes, in its international EUR 10 million Series A funding round. The investors behind the funding are private equity investors Shift4Good and Superhero Capital Ltd as well as Tesi together with the European Guarantee Fund of the European Investment Bank. The equity-based funding will support the company’s international expansion, software development, platform automation, and the growth of its concept for the second-hand market of bikes. Vapaus Bikes Finland is at the forefront of sustainable mobility services and has been a pioneer in the Employee Benefit Bikes sector since late 2020. It has been ranked among Finland’s fastest growing companies. Shift4Good is an impact venture capital fund focused on the decarbonisation of the transportation sector. Tesi (officially Finnish Industry Investment Ltd) is a state-owned, market-driven investment company that invests in venture capital and private equity funds and directly in Finnish startups and growth companies.
Case published 21.8.2024
City of Rovaniemi – Former employees ordered to pay damages in an investment decision matter
We successfully acted for the City of Rovaniemi in a matter concerning offence in public office and damages claims in relation to a significant investment decision made by the city. The defendants were the city’s former municipal corporate officer, who was in an employment relationship, and a city treasurer, who was in a public-service employment relationship and acted as the supervisor of the municipal corporate officer. The criminal matter related to the City Board’s decision to invest EUR 2 million of the city’s funds in bonds offered by a newly established investment company in accordance with a decision prepared by the defendants. A significant part of the company’s operations involved quick loan business. The main legal question in the matter was whether the investment of public funds constitutes an exercise of public authority and whether regulation on offences in public office therefore becomes applicable even to a person in an employment relationship. The municipal corporate officer in an employment relationship was charged with aggravated abuse of public office based on her negligence in the preparation and presentation of the investment decision as well as based on a conflict of interest due to the fact that she had invested her own money in a company that received funding from the investment target presented to the City Board. The charges of an offence in public office against the city treasurer concerned his position as the supervisor and reporter of the city’s investment activities. He was also involved in the preparation and presentation of the City Board’s decision. The processing of the matter started in the District Court of Lapland in June 2022. In its judgment given in August 2022, the District Court stated, based among other things on our argumentation, that the investment of public funds constitutes an exercise of public authority and that regulation on offences in public office can therefore be applied to the municipal corporate officer. The District Court deemed that the conduct of the former municipal corporate officer fulfils the characteristics of abuse of public office and that the conduct of the former city treasurer fulfils the characteristics of violation of official duty with respect to the preparation of the investment decision, but the right to bring charges had become time-barred. Punishments could therefore not be imposed on the defendants, but the defendants were ordered to jointly and severally pay the city approximately EUR 114,000 in damages plus interest for late payment. The city treasurer’s share of the amount was 10%. The prosecutor accepted the judgment but the other parties appealed it to the Court of Appeal. Acting for the city, we pursued claims for both punishment and damages in the Court of Appeal. The Rovaniemi Court of Appeal processed the matter in November and December 2023. In its judgment given in June 2024, the Court of Appeal upheld the District Court’s judgment with respect to the abuse of public office and violation of official duty. The Court of Appeal deemed that the municipal corporate officer had failed in her duty to declare the conflict of interest. In addition, she had failed in her duty to ensure that the prepared decision was in compliance with the city’s investment guidelines and that it had been properly put out to tender. The Court of Appeal also found that the text of the investment proposal was insufficient and misleading and that the municipal corporate officer’s conduct was intentional. As regards the city treasurer, the Court of Appeal held that he had failed in his duty to ensure that the investment proposal to the City Board complied with the investment guidelines, that the presentation was not misleading and that risks were taken into account as required by the investment guidelines. With the judgement, the Court of Appeal took a clear position that abuse in public offices and when exercising public authority is not acceptable. The judgment is also significant as it declares that investing public funds constitutes an exercise of public authority and that the liability for acts in office therefore becomes applicable even to persons in employment relationships. In addition, a key question for the Court of Appeal to assess was defining the amount of economic damage in a matter related to investment activities. The Court of Appeal held based on our arguments that the conduct of the municipal corporate officer and the city treasurer had caused damage to the city. The Court of Appeal increased the amount of damages to EUR 210,000 with the city treasurer’s share limited to 10%. The amount was increased because the Court of Appeal deemed that the city had suffered damage not only in terms of the loss of capital but also in terms of the loss of estimated return on investment. The judgement is not final.
Case published 21.8.2024