7.5.2020

EU Increases Tax Regulation– New DAC6 Reporting Obligation for Cross-Border Transactions

In a globalised world, business often extends beyond the country where a company has its headquarters. Countries of operation want to know how the business decisions made by companies will impact their tax incomes.

With this in mind, countries have begun monitoring tax streams more carefully over the past few years. This has also led to quite fast-paced regulatory measures in the EU and to an ever-expanding exchange of information between member states.

DAC6 Introduces New Reporting Obligation

A new reporting obligation relating to tax streams was introduced for Finnish Companies at the start of 2020, when the Act on Reporting Tax Arrangements entered into force.

The act is based on the EU Directive on cross-border tax arrangements, called DAC6. Under the new act, a company’s planned or implemented cross-border arrangements that could involve characteristics of tax avoidance must be reported to the Finnish Tax Administration or other EU member state tax authority.

Dispersed Reporting Obligation

The reporting obligation applies to service providers participating in the arrangement as advisors, such as investment banks, audit firms and attorneys. Numerous parties may have to report the same arrangement in multiple states. Each party subject to the obligation must ensure that all of the information required by the act is reported.

The company itself may in certain circumstances have the reporting obligation. This is the case when the arrangement does not involve a service provider that has a reporting obligation, or the service provider has been exempted from the obligation. For example, legal professional privilege generally prevents attorneys from reporting arrangements.

Failing to comply with the reporting obligation could lead to a penalty payment. The amount of the penalty varies from country to country: in Finland, it is at most 15,000 euros, but in Poland for example, it can reach several million euros.

IPR Licencing and Intra-Group Transfers in Focus

Not all cross-border arrangements need to be reported; there are certain hallmarks (provided for in sections 12–22 of the act) that arrangements have to meet to require reporting. In some cases, the hallmarks for reporting expressly mention that the main purpose of the arrangement is to obtain a tax benefit.

Companies should pay particular attention to the transfer (such as sale or licensing) of immaterial goods that are difficult to value and to the transfer of intra-group operations, risks or assets. These common business arrangements can easily trigger the reporting obligation even if their main purpose is not to gain a tax benefit.

The Finnish Tax Administration is currently working on extensive reporting guidelines, which should be ready in April.

Partially Retroactive Reporting Obligation – Does Your Company Already Have Arrangements to Report?

The first reports must be filed on arrangements that start on or after 1 July 2020. Arrangement have to be disclosed within 30 days of when:

The act also requires that certain already implemented arrangements be reported. Arrangements implemented between 25 June 2018 and 30 June 2020 must be reported to the Finnish Tax Administration no later than on 31 August 2020.

It is important that companies and their advisors begin identifying retroactively reportable arrangements immediately.

Latest references

We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
We advised HANZA on the divestment of its Nivala and Sievi operations. The transaction was part of HANZA’s larger strategic reorganisation, where the company optimised its Finnish manufacturing cluster. Founded in 2008, HANZA is a Swedish mechanical engineering and electronics contract manufacturing company listed on the Nasdaq Stockholm main list. HANZA has approximately 5,000 employees and annual sales of SEK 10 billion. 
Case published 3.9.2026
We advised Kiwa in its acquisition of Sertio Oy, a Finnish notified body designated by the authority in accordance with the EU Regulation on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR). Sertio provides conformity assessment services in accordance with IVDR. Kiwa is one of the world’s leading testing, inspection, and certification companies, operating in over 35 countries. 
Case published 7.5.2026
We advised Metsäkonepalvelu Oy in its acquisition of the entire share capital of Junnonen Forest Oy, a Finnish timber harvesting services company, and the timber harvesting services business of Lamerit Oy. The acquisition supports Metsäkonepalvelu’s growth strategy and strengthens the company’s position, particularly in southeastern Finland. Metsäkonepalvelu is a portfolio company of A. Ahlström Oy, a Finnish family-owned industrial owner. The company provides mechanical timber harvesting services to forest companies, large private forest owners, and the public sector in Finland and Sweden. Metsäkonepalvelu Group employs nearly two hundred forestry professionals.
Case published 6.5.2026