2.3.2018

Are Your Service Agreements GDPR Ready?

The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will begin to be applied on 25 May 2018. From that date on, outsourcing the processing of personal data will be subject to more stringent regulations than under Finland’s current Personal Data Act. Now is the time for every company that outsources personal data processing to make sure that their service agreements meet the new requirements.

Even if you have outsourced the processing of personal data, you remain liable for that processing. You cannot outsource your statutory obligations, and failing to meet those obligations can carry heavy consequences.

The key issue is how the outsourcing company (in data protection parlance, the data controller) has instructed the service provider, i.e. the personal data processor. The instructions must be documented, and are often incorporated into data processing agreements that define the rights and obligations of both the data controller and the processor with respect to the processing of personal data.

A Data Processing Agreement is a Must

The GDPR requires that the outsourcing of personal data processing must be agreed in writing. The GDPR also sets minimum requirements for what the agreement must contain. The most important requirements are:

Many Kinds of Data Protection Agreements

In practice, a data protection agreement can be either included as a section on personal data processing in the service agreement itself or by executing a separate personal data processing appendix or agreement. A separate appendix is often a good option, because it is easy to add to existing agreements.

Despite the fact that the GDPR requires a written data processing agreement, neither the EU nor Finland’s data protection authorities have yet published model agreements. As a result, many data controllers and processors have drafted their own models in an effort to fulfil the requirements of the GDPR. As the roles of the companies, the personal data to be processed and the outsourced functions vary, data processing agreements also vary a great deal.

The GDPR sets the minimum requirements for data processing agreements, but it is often justified to agree on other things, as well. For example, the agreement can set out how quickly the data processor has to notify the data controller of data breaches.

In contract negotiations, the issue of the parties’ liability for damages and the possible limitation of liability often arises. It is worth dedicating time to resolving this, particularly when adding a data protection appendix to an existing service agreement. Other common issues that come up in negotiations include the processor’s right to use subcontractors, data transfers out of the EU, maintaining backups after the expiry of the service agreement and the compensation of costs incurred by the processor from assisting the data controller.

Choose Your Service Provider Carefully

Even though data processing agreements are important, data protection is something that needs to be on your mind already when choosing a service provider. Under the GDPR, the data controller must assess the expertise of service providers and only use providers that furnish sufficient guarantees that the data will be properly protected.

The higher the risk posed by processing to the data subjects – for instance, if the processing of healthcare data is being outsourced – the stronger the data controller’s obligation to ensure that the service provider is capable of processing personal data securely.

What is the Next Step?

The requirements of the GDPR are backed up by a significant risk of sanction. As a result, companies that are data controllers must first determine the circumstances in which they transfer personal data to service providers. Without this knowledge, it is difficult to ensure that the terms of any contracts they have meet the GDPR’s requirements. This is true of both existing and future contracting relationships

As the GDPR’s requirements are new, it is quite likely that existing service agreements do not meet all of them. Every company that has outsourced personal data processing needs to be preparing to amend their old agreements. There will only be few months’ transition time before the GDPR becomes effective, so if you haven’t already started updating your agreements, now is the time. Naturally, the GDPR’s requirements will have to be taken into account in new agreements, as well.

Latest references

We successfully represented insurance companies LähiTapiola and OP Henkivakuutus in two cases concerning an important point of principle: the right of insurance companies to process health data as part of the insurance application process. The Supreme Administrative Court handed down twin decisions ( one published as precedent ) addressing the matter in light of contrary DPA decisions. Under the Finnish Data Protection Act, insurance companies may, to simplify, process health data concerning “insured persons” (vakuutettu, försäkrad) to determine liability under the insurance. This rule constitutes an exception to Article 9 GDPR. At issue was whether the term “insured person” also covers people in the process of obtaining insurance coverage or only people who are already covered. In more practical terms: can an insurance company rely on the rule when considering whether/how to grant the insurance in the first place? The SAC answered in the affirmative and thus upheld the traditional industry approach over the DPA’s contrary view. The SAC noted that the Data Protection Act did not define the term “insured person” and thus looked at insurance legislation for guidance. As argued by the insurance companies, that legislation also uses the term in the context of describing the insured person’s pre-contractual informational obligations. Thus, and in view of the underlying purpose of the rule at issue, the SAC found that an “insured person” could be someone in the process of obtaining coverage, not just a person already covered. The outcome clarifies the scope of the local rule at the insurance application stage for the Finnish insurance industry.
Case published 22.1.2026
We acted as Finnish counsel to SuperOffice AS, backed by Axcel, in its acquisition of Lyyti Oy from Finnish private equity firm Vaaka Partners and other sellers. Lyyti is a leading event management software company for physical, digital and hybrid events with a strong customer base in Finland, Sweden and France. SuperOffice is a leading provider of customer relationship management (CRM) software for small and medium-sized businesses across Northern Europe. Axcel is a Nordic private equity firm with a focus on technology, business services and industrials, healthcare, and consumer sectors.
Case published 9.12.2025
We advised Lantmännen ek för in its contemplated acquisition of Leipurin from Aspo Plc. Lantmännen is an agricultural cooperative and Northern Europe’s leader in agriculture, machinery, bioenergy and food products. Lantmännen is owned by 17,000 Swedish farmers and has 12,000 employees in over 20 countries. Leipurin is a leading Nordic supplier of bakery ingredients, equipment, and expert services to professional bakeries, confectioneries, and food manufacturers. The company operates across Finland, Sweden, and the Baltic countries with subsidiaries located in the aforementioned countries, providing comprehensive solutions to the baking industry. The closing of the transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals.
Case published 25.8.2025
We assisted Oomi Oy in its expansion into the mobile telecommunications market with the launch of Oomi Mobiili, a new MVNO brand. Our work covered the preceding due diligence process as well as structuring and negotiating key partner agreements, laying a solid foundation for Oomi’s entry into the new market. Oomi Mobiili will operate as a virtual mobile network operator, offering customers the option to purchase a mobile subscription together with their electricity contract. The phased launch is set to begin in autumn 2025, with nationwide availability targeted for early 2026. 
Case published 15.8.2025