2.9.2014

A Well-Functioning Shareholders’ Agreement for a Startup 2/2

In our previous post, we presented the first two of certain fundamental matters that need to be considered when preparing the shareholders’ agreement (SHA) for a startup. In this part, we will concentrate on exit and leaver situations and introduce a few essential clauses to ensure that you are ready for these changes.  

The ‘Leaver’ Situations

Every startup comes to a point where the honeymoon is over and some of the founders wish to find a ‘real job’ and leave the company. Also, as the business grows, the administration might need some reassessing. If the founders have their background in, say, engineering, they perhaps no longer have sufficient competence for managing the company alone.

The SHA should include provisions on what will happen if someone neglects their working obligation or other material provision of the SHA, or if a shareholder leaves the company. Under these kinds of circumstances, you want to avoid a situation where one of the shareholders quits their job straight after setting up a startup but still retains the right to their shares, the decision-making rights and the right to the dividends and proceeds those shares may entitle them to in the future.

As a precaution for a breach of working obligations, a contractual penalty clause is a must in the SHA. Another practical method is to agree that the other shareholders will have the right to redeem the shares of the breaching shareholder, e.g., on a predetermined price.

When drafting the terms concerning shareholders who leave the company, the concept of ‘leavers’ is useful. The company may, for example, terminate an employment relationship due to gross misconduct or dishonesty pursuant to the Employment Contracts Act, other legislation or an employment contract. This is a case of bad leaver. On the other hand, the termination may have been decided in consensus or due to grounds beyond the parties’ control, which constitutes a case of good leaver. In both situations, the other shareholders should have the right to redeem the shares of the leaving shareholder. However, a good leaver should receive the market price for their shares, whilst the price paid to a bad leaver tends to be heavily discounted.

Transfer of Equity Securities and Exit

To control the acceptance of new shareholders in your company, you should consider setting restrictions on the transfer of shares. Share restrictions are also commonly used to favour the existing shareholders. For instance, the existing shareholders should have a primary right to buy new shares issued by the company before they are offered to the public (pre-emptive right) or to buy shares that one of the shareholders has offered to sell (right of first refusal). In the latter option, a shareholder having received an offer from a third party must notify the other shareholders of the price and the other terms and conditions of the offer, allowing the existing shareholders to buy the shares first.

Other significant clauses in the SHA are drag-along and tag-along rights. The drag-along right applies when the majority of the shareholders wish to sell their shares or the business of the company. Based on this right, if the shareholders receive an offer that becomes accepted by the majority, the rest of the shareholders are forced to drag along and join the deal. Tag-along rights, on the other hand, mean that if the majority of the shareholders decide to sell their shares, the minority shareholders have the right to join the deal (tag along) on the same terms and conditions. The tag-along right is important especially for investors, who have, in the first place, invested in the principal business and do not wish to continue investing in the new owners.

Finally, it is extremely important that all the shareholders agree on when, how and for what price the business should be sold one day. These conditions should also be clearly stated in the SHA.

Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Clauses

Last but definitely not least, the SHA should include terms on confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation. These clauses can rightly be called the life insurance of a startup, and they exist to prevent serious damage to the company and its business.

The confidentiality clause protects all technical, financial, commercial and other information of the company that should not be disclosed. In turn, the non-competition clause forbids any secondary occupations that may compete or conflict with the company’s business. The non-competition clause must be reasonable and fair but comprehensive to protect the core business. The non-solicitation clause is closely related to the non-competition clause, as it prohibits shareholders from persuading the employees of the company (typically, the best programmers) to get involved in new, competing businesses.

All these restrictions should remain in effect for some time after the shareholder has left the company, regardless of the reason of leaving. Some investors, however, are allowed to have many portfolios in different businesses, also in businesses that are actually competing with each other. This may leave them in an exceptional position in which non-competition clauses do not apply. However, confidentiality clauses naturally do.

Conclusion

With a well-drafted SHA, you will be able to solve severe problems well ahead, even before they actually arise. Our advice is that the first thing to do when starting your company is to sit around a table with your co-founders and think these issues through. Preparing an SHA is significantly easier, quicker and cheaper when it is done at the beginning, compared to difficult negotiations later on when there is already a growing rift between the parties. The SHA protects the company when things don’t go as planned, and, as we all know, plans never go to plan. Preparing the SHA carefully takes a weight off your shoulders and leaves you free to concentrate on your business at full stretch.

Tuomas Honkinen

Latest references

We are acting as the lead counsel to Fortum in a cross-border transaction in which Fortum is selling its recycling and waste business. The business is sold to thematic impact investing firm Summa Equity through its portfolio company NG Group. The debt-free purchase price is approximately EUR 800 million. The transaction is subject to authority approval and customary closing conditions. Fortum’s recycling and waste business to be sold comprises municipal and industrial waste management and end-to-end plastics, metals, ash, slag and hazardous waste treatment and recycling services. These businesses are located in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway and currently employ approximately 900 employees.
Case published 18.7.2024
We advised Andritz Oy, a part of ANDRITZ group, with their acquisition of all the shares in Procemex Oy. The acquisition further strengthens ANDRITZ’s automation and digitalisation portfolio. Procemex is a global leader in integrated web monitoring and web inspection solutions for the pulp and paper industry. It has a team of more than 100 vision systems experts and has subsidiaries in Germany, Japan and the US. ANDRITZ offers a broad portfolio of innovative plants, equipment, systems, services and digital solutions for a wide range of industries and end markets. ANDRITZ is a global market leader in all four of its business areas – Pulp & Paper, Metals, Hydropower and Environment & Energy. The publicly listed group has around 30,000 employees and over 280 locations in more than 80 countries.
Case published 18.7.2024
We successfully acted as the lead external counsel for Citycon Plc in an arrangement whereby Citycon outsourced its Nordic Accounting and Lease Administration operations and related workforce in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Estonia to Staria Plc. The outsourcing is expected to take place as of 1 August 2024. With this outsourcing arrangement, Citycon aims to align the size and capabilities of the company’s finance organisation with its future development, ensuring it can adapt to meet the company’s needs at any given time. During the assignment, we assisted Citycon in drafting the necessary contract documentation and planning the contract negotiations and timetable. We led the outsourcing agreement negotiations and advised Citycon on employee transfer and data privacy related matters. We also coordinated legal advice for other in-scope countries. Citycon is the leading owner and developer of urban hubs in the Nordics and Baltics. Citycon’s 33 mixed-use, necessity-based centres are located in the major cities in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Estonia. Citycon transforms unique locations into sustainable communities and cities full of life, serving 140 million people each year and delivering long-term share value. Citycon brings value to communities by developing urban hubs for living, working, socialising and shopping. Citycon has extensive experience as an urban developer and uses its expertise in creating mixed-use centres that include retail, offices, hotels, housing, food & beverage as well as healthcare, culture and leisure services.
Case published 13.5.2024
We acted as Zendesk, Inc.’s Finnish legal counsel in its acquisition of Ultimate Enterprises Oy, an industry leading provider of service automation using AI technology. The cross-border acquisition was completed in cooperation with the transaction’s lead counsel Allen & Overy. Zendesk is a leading global technology company that provides software-as-a-service and customer experience (CX) products based in the US. The acquisition of Ultimate expands Zendesk’s AI-powered CX offerings.
Case published 26.3.2024