24.5.2016

What Is State Aid? – Commission Provides Specifics

On 19 May 2016, the European Commission published its long-awaited notice on the requirements for applying the EU’s state aid rules. The notice is part of an overall modernisation programme of the EU’s state aid rules that began in 2012, and the purpose of the notice is to help both the recipients of aid, i.e. companies, and authorities granting aid to evaluate when a benefit granted from public funds is or is not within the scope of the EU’s state aid rules.

State Aid Rules Promote Equal Conditions for Competition

The purpose of state aid regulation is to ensure that companies operating in the EU’s common market have equal operating conditions and to prevent preferential treatment by individual Member States of companies established in that Member State. The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) prohibits a benefit that

All of the above criteria must be met in order for aid to be considered a violation of the EU’s state aid rules.

The notice clarifies when a public benefit granted to a company can be considered to meet each of the above criteria. The notice also takes a position on the assessment of certain forms of aid, such as tax benefits and infrastructure financing. The notice collects the Court of Justice’s earlier case law and it replaces the Commission’s previous instructions on direct taxation and the sale of public land and buildings. 

 

Social Security and Health Care Services as Economic Activity

The Commission’s notice evaluates the notion of aid in several different sectors. From the perspective of Finland’s social welfare and health care reform, it is worth noting that the Commission has compiled the case law of the EU courts concerning, for example, what is meant by an undertaking or economic activity with respect to social welfare and health care services. The Commission notice takes a position on what kinds of health care or social welfare operations are in accordance with what is called the solidarity principle and, thus, outside the scope of EU state aid regulation, and what kinds of operations are market-based. The notice also directly acknowledges that health care is organised in very different ways in different Member States.

It is safe to assume that the issues brought up in the notice will be read carefully in connection with Finland’s social welfare and health care reform. They are also closely linked to the debate surrounding competition neutrality between public and private actors.

Fully Local Aid is not EU State Aid

The EU’s state aid rules are not applicable to aid provided to fully local operations, provide certain conditions are met. Such aid does not affect trade between Member States. According to the Commission, this category of aid includes funding to sports and leisure facilities and cultural events serving predominantly a local audience and that are, thus, unlikely to attract customers from other Member States. Thus, the notice clarifies the types of aid that the Commission does not consider to affect trade between Member States. The Commission has no jurisdiction to assess or reclaim aid that does not fulfil all of the criteria of state aid.

In-House Activities Can also be Economic Activities that Must be Incorporated

The Commission’s notice also takes a clear stand that in-house activities can be considered economic activities subject to the EU’s state aid rules. This can be the case, for example, when an in-house unit provides services internally, but also offers the same services to other customers in exchange for payment. Given that the Local Government Act contains exceptions to the corporatisation obligation normally applied in such situations, it may be necessary to re-evaluate the Local Government Act.

Always Evaluate State Aid on a Case-by-Case Basis

Despite the clarity brought by the Commission’s notice, the applicability of state aid rules is something that should always be carried out on a case-by-case basis and preferably in writing. If the Commission subsequently finds a granted benefit to be in violation of the EU’s state aid rules, the benefit can be reclaimed from the recipient with interest during ten years after being granted.

Latest references

We are acting as the lead counsel to Fortum in a cross-border transaction in which Fortum is selling its recycling and waste business. The business is sold to thematic impact investing firm Summa Equity through its portfolio company NG Group. The debt-free purchase price is approximately EUR 800 million. The transaction is subject to authority approval and customary closing conditions. Fortum’s recycling and waste business to be sold comprises municipal and industrial waste management and end-to-end plastics, metals, ash, slag and hazardous waste treatment and recycling services. These businesses are located in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway and currently employ approximately 900 employees.
Case published 18.7.2024
We advised Andritz Oy, a part of ANDRITZ group, with their acquisition of all the shares in Procemex Oy. The acquisition further strengthens ANDRITZ’s automation and digitalisation portfolio. Procemex is a global leader in integrated web monitoring and web inspection solutions for the pulp and paper industry. It has a team of more than 100 vision systems experts and has subsidiaries in Germany, Japan and the US. ANDRITZ offers a broad portfolio of innovative plants, equipment, systems, services and digital solutions for a wide range of industries and end markets. ANDRITZ is a global market leader in all four of its business areas – Pulp & Paper, Metals, Hydropower and Environment & Energy. The publicly listed group has around 30,000 employees and over 280 locations in more than 80 countries.
Case published 18.7.2024
We acted as the legal advisor to OP Finland Infrastructure LP in its investment in Cactos Fleet Finland Ky. Cactos Fleet Finland invests in smart electricity storage systems in Finland. OP Finland Infrastructure is a fund investing in Finnish infrastructure. The fund is managed by OP Financial Group. Cactos Fleet Finland primarily invests in electricity storage systems installed in real estate properties. In addition to their grid-related tasks, these systems can level out peaks in the property’s electricity consumption and provide back-up power. 
Case published 29.4.2024
We acted as legal advisor to OP Finland Infrastructure LP in its investment in ESL Shipping Ltd, a Finnish shipping company. Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company co-invested in the company. The investment was made against new shares in ESL Shipping, and  the EUR 45 million co-investment  corresponds to a  21.43 % holding in the company. The aim of the investment is to accelerate ESL Shipping’s green transition. ESL Shipping Ltd is a Finnish shipping company. Its main shareholder is Aspo Plc. OP Finland Infrastructure is a fund investing in Finnish infrastructure. The fund is managed by OP Financial Group. Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company is a Finnish pension insurance company. In September 2023 the value of its investment portfolio amounted to EUR 57.5 billion. 
Case published 26.4.2024