22.9.2022

The Limited Liability Companies Act reform means that general meeting practices remain flexible

General meeting practices changed during the last few years after remote participation became possible in the spring of 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic. This transition period came to an end on 11 July 2022 when the Limited Liability Companies Act reform entered into force, with significant amendments to chapter 5, which regulates general meetings. Some of the amendments have been in use in listed companies since the temporary legislation of 2020 entered into force, but the current reform will also introduce entirely new possibilities. The reform focuses on various possibilities for remote participation, which enable general meetings to be permanently organised remotely in part or in full going forward, i.e. as hybrid or remote meetings, as long as the shareholders’ right to participate and the correctness of the vote counting can be established as reliably as in a traditional physical meeting. In the future, changing the general meeting practices without the consent of all shareholders will be possible for non-listed companies as well. Naturally, general meetings may still be organised in a fully traditional manner if the company so wishes.

In the future, hybrid meetings will be possible for all limited liability companies

Organising hybrid meetings, i.e. enabling real-time remote participation in full in a traditional meeting, will be possible for all limited liability companies based on a decision by the board of directors. This does not require amendments to the articles of association. Full participation in a general meeting means that a shareholder can exercise their power of decision freely. In practice, this means that a shareholder participating remotely is able to exercise their right to attend, to speak and to vote largely in the same manner as any shareholder participating at the meeting venue. In hybrid meetings, the meeting place is the company’s domicile, as customary, or another meeting place set forth in the articles of association.

The board of directors can decide that in addition to participation at the meeting venue and real-time remote participation, supplementary ways of remote participation will be offered in a hybrid meeting before the start of the meeting or during the meeting, unless the articles of association prohibit or limit offering such ways of participation. This can mean, for example, advance participation by mail or data link largely in the same manner as in meetings of listed companies under the temporary legislation. Supplementary ways can be used to increase shareholders’ opportunities to participate, but they will not fully replace actual participation in meetings as the board of directors may decide to impose limitations on the supplementary ways of remote participation, unless otherwise set forth in the articles of association. We believe that for example offering opportunities such as advance voting will be popular in the future, particularly now as shareholders have become accustomed to it during the temporary legislation.

If the company’s shareholders wish that there will be no possibility to organise hybrid meetings, a specific provision must be included in the articles of association to prohibit remote participation or to limit it to some extent. This shows that in the reformed Act, the flexibility of meeting practices is considered as the default that can be deviated from only by way of specific provisions in the articles of association.

The practicalities of organising meetings are made easier by the fact that in the notice convening the general meeting, shareholders can be required to make a binding commitment to whether they will participate in the meeting remotely. On the day of the meeting, shareholders cannot change their mind and participate in the meeting at the meeting venue.

Organising remote meetings requires amending the articles of association

Unlike a hybrid meeting, organising a general meeting entirely remotely, i.e. with no meeting venue and in such a way that the shareholders can fully exercise their rights in real-time by way of a data link, requires a specific provision to be added in the articles of association. It can be set forth in the articles of association that the general meeting shall be or can be organised in this manner. It is recommended that the provision in the articles of association enabling remote meetings is drafted so that it will enable the various meeting procedures to be as flexible as possible in the future.

In a remote meeting organised without a meeting venue, the board of directors may also decide to offer means of remote participation to supplement full participation (such as the opportunity to vote in advance) before the meeting or during the meeting, unless prohibited or limited in the articles of association. Organising the opportunity to vote in advance may be recommended in these cases as well, so that the shareholders can choose their manner of participation as freely as possible.

Until the end of 2022, amending the articles of association to make organising hybrid meetings obligatory may in listed companies be decided by advance voting in meetings under the temporary legislation. After the transitional period the issue will be decided in the same manner as any other amendment to the articles of association. However, the exception is that the decision to amend the articles of association so that organising hybrid meetings becomes obligatory can be reached by a simple majority instead of a two-thirds majority.

We estimate that the transition to remote meetings will be quite long and daunting for many listed companies. Next spring will likely prove to be a testing period for hybrid meetings. In contrast, non-listed companies will in many cases find transitioning to remote meeting easier after the coronavirus pandemic. Based on our information, there have already been some amendments to companies’ articles of association to enable remote meetings. Technical solutions for organising remote meetings are being developed in several quarters and the range of available services will likely increase during the next general meeting season.

Latest references

We acted as Finnish counsel to Pernod Ricard in the sale of a portfolio of local Nordic brands to Oy Hartwall Ab, an affiliate of the Danish group Royal Unibrew. Pernod Ricard is a worldwide leader in the spirits and wine industry. The local portfolio of brands includes spirits, liqueurs and Finnish wine brands, the best-known being the liqueur Minttu, along with their related production assets based in Turku, Finland. The closing of the transaction remains subject to customary conditions.
Case published 21.10.2024
We act as the lead legal counsel in the groundbreaking case of Multitude SE’s (Multitude) proposed relocation from Finland to Switzerland. The first phase of the relocation, involving the transfer of Multitude’s registered office from Finland to Malta pursuant to SE Regulation, was successfully completed on 30 June 2024. In this connection, Multitude’s shares were removed from the Finnish book-entry system and the issuer central securities depository of the shares changed from Euroclear Finland Oy to the CSD operated by the Malta Stock Exchange. In practice, all of Multitude’s shares are now held through Clearstream. In Malta, the company is anticipated to be converted into a public limited liability company under Maltese law, following which it will seek redomiciliation from Malta to Switzerland. Given that Finnish legislation does not allow for direct relocation to a non-European Economic Area country such as Switzerland while preserving the company’s legal personality, the process necessitated a multi-jurisdictional strategy as outlined above. Our mandate encompasses advising Multitude on all aspects governed by Finnish law concerning the proposed relocation and coordinating the work of local legal counsel and various other advisors involved in the project. The process also involved a written procedure to amend Multitude’s existing subordinated capital notes and senior bonds to facilitate the relocation as well as placement of EUR 80 million senior guaranteed notes by a newly established Multitude Capital Oyj. ”The transfer to Malta marks a significant step in Multitude’s journey. This pioneering and complex process has been successfully implemented with the invaluable support of our own team and advisors. Castrén & Snellman has masterfully orchestrated the entire project, ensuring seamless coordination across multiple jurisdictions. We look forward to achieving our next step with the further relocation to Switzerland”, says Jorma Jokela, Multitude’s CEO. Multitude is a fully regulated growth platform for financial technology, employing over 700 individuals across 25 countries. Its shares are listed on the regulated market (Prime Standard) of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
Case published 1.7.2024
We advise Evli, a leading Nordic investment and wealth management company, in a strategic partnership with Bregal Milestone. The objective of the strategic partnership is to grow the business of Evli Alexander Incentives Oy. In connection with the strategic partnership and to reflect its new vision and strategy, Evli Alexander Incentives Oy will be rebranded to Allshares Oy. As part of the partnership arrangement Bregal Milestone has agreed to invest over EUR 65 million in Allshares to acquire shares owned by certain minority shareholders and to fund future organic and inorganic growth in the company. Following completion of the arrangement, Bregal Milestone will own 55 percent of the shares and votes in Allshares, Evli Plc will own 42 percent, and Allshares’ management will own the remaining 3 percent. The arrangement will mark a significant strategic and financial partnership for Evli Plc and is expected to increase the value of Evli Plc’s ownership in Allshares over a longer period. ‘We are very excited to partner with Bregal Milestone, who shares our vision of becoming the leading provider of share-based incentive and compensation plan management and design in Europe and beyond. With their support, we will be able to accelerate our growth, invest in our platform, and enter new markets. We believe that this partnership will create significant value for our clients, employees, and shareholders,’ Maunu Lehtimäki, CEO of Evli comments. Bregal Milestone is a leading European growth private equity firm and enjoys a strong track record in scaling Nordic champions across Europe via organic and inorganic growth. Bregal Milestone will bring strategic guidance, operational support, financial resources, and access to its deep network of partners and contacts to accelerate organic and inorganic growth of Allshares.
Case published 7.3.2024
We advised SATO Corporation and lead manager Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) Helsinki Branch in a rights issue. SATO received gross proceeds of approximately EUR 200 million from the issue. SATO Corporation is an expert in sustainable rental housing and one of Finland’s largest rental housing providers. SATO owns around 25,000 rental homes in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Tampere and Turku. Approximately 45,000 residents live in SATOhomes.
Case published 29.2.2024