1.12.2021

Tax Liability of Foreign Companies to Change if Decisions Made in Finland

From the start of 2021, a company with its place of effective management in Finland has been generally liable to tax in Finland for its global income regardless of the country in which the company was established. Prior to this, foreign companies were always considered to have limited tax liability in Finland.

Finland is not an exception in this regard, as Norway, Denmark, Germany, the UK and the Netherlands, among other countries, all have similar legislation in force. Potential double taxation is eliminated through tax treaties binding on Finland.

The definition of the place of effective management is expansive: it is the place in which the company’s board of directors or other decision-making organ makes the most important decisions relating to the company’s highest-level daily management. However, the assessment does take into consideration other circumstances relating to the business operations and organisation.

How is the Place of Effective Management Determined?

If the meetings of the board of directors are organised remotely, the place of effective management is assessed based on the location from where the meeting is joined. This being the case, if the board of directors of a company registered abroad joins a meeting from Finland, the decisions are made in Finland. If the members of the board join the meeting from several different locations, the place of effective management is assessed based on the location of the company’s headquarters or other executive management.

On the other hand, the place of effective management has to be sufficiently permanent. For example, meetings held as video conferences and other temporary arrangements made due to the pandemic do not form a place of effective management in Finland as long as the arrangement, even if it proves to be a good one, remains temporary.

With respect to group companies located abroad, it is a good idea to separate the group’s highest strategic management from the daily management of foreign group companies. For example, the place of effective management of a group’s holding company could be in the Finnish parent company.

Despite New Guidance, Assessment is Always Case by Case

The Finnish Tax Administration has updated its guidance in line with the new legislation. The new guidance provides examples of how the new legislation is applied in certain situations, but the assessment must always be on a case-by-case basis. It is worthwhile to review your company’s operations in light of the new legislation to chart risks. We would be happy to assist you in this exercise.

Latest references

We advised Kiwa in its acquisition of Sertio Oy, a Finnish notified body designated by the authority in accordance with the EU Regulation on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR). Sertio provides conformity assessment services in accordance with IVDR. Kiwa is one of the world’s leading testing, inspection, and certification companies, operating in over 35 countries. 
Case published 7.5.2026
We advised Metsäkonepalvelu Oy in its acquisition of the entire share capital of Junnonen Forest Oy, a Finnish timber harvesting services company, and the timber harvesting services business of Lamerit Oy. The acquisition supports Metsäkonepalvelu’s growth strategy and strengthens the company’s position, particularly in southeastern Finland. Metsäkonepalvelu is a portfolio company of A. Ahlström Oy, a Finnish family-owned industrial owner. The company provides mechanical timber harvesting services to forest companies, large private forest owners, and the public sector in Finland and Sweden. Metsäkonepalvelu Group employs nearly two hundred forestry professionals.
Case published 6.5.2026
We advised Aurevia Oy, a portfolio company of French private equity sponsor Mérieux Equity Partners, in a strategic reorganisation that involved splitting Aurevia and its parent companies into two independent groups of companies and reorganisation of its existing debt-financing arrangements. Following the reorganisation, the newly formed Aurevia continues as a leading provider of Contract Research Organization (CRO) and Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs (QARA) services, while the newly formed Labquality focuses on delivering External Quality Assessment (EQA) services. Aurevia serves operators in the medical devices, in vitro diagnostics and pharmaceutical sectors. Labquality’s customers include clinical laboratories and social and healthcare organisations. The reorganisation positions Aurevia and Labquality to allocate investments more effectively, accelerate growth within their respective customer segments, and respond to evolving market and client needs. The transaction was implemented through multiple parallel demergers and required comprehensive legal and tax structuring across several jurisdictions. Our team supported Aurevia throughout the planning and implementation phases, covering corporate, tax, employment law, and regulatory matters, as well as the optimisation of each group’s financing structure.
Case published 7.4.2026
We advised UK-based investment company Downing in its acquisition of the entire share capital of Tornionlaakson Voima Oy. Tornionlaakson Voima owns three hydropower plants in the Tengeliönjoki river system – the Portimokoski power plants in Ylitornio, the Jolmankoski power plants in Raanujärvi and the Kaaranneskoski power plants in Sirkkakoski. The power plants produce a total of approx. 45 gigawatt-hours of electricity per year. Tornionlaakson Voima’s daily operations will continue normally, and the transaction will not affect customers. The consummation of the transaction is subject to the approval of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment. Downing has over 35 years’ experience in providing a wide range of investment solutions to the needs of institutional investors, advisers and retail investors. The company manages over £2 billion in assets in both the private and public markets and its current hydro power portfolio includes approx. 50 hydro power plants in the Nordics. 
Case published 27.3.2026