Finnish special investment funds are still quite rare even though the Finnish Act on Alternative Investment Funds Managers (162/2014) allows for their establishment. When structuring a closed-end special investment fund, attention should be paid to the special provisions concerning it. When used correctly, the structure of a special investment fund may make it possible to establish and manage closed-end funds in a cost-efficient manner.
30.12.2022
Special investment funds also work as closed-end funds – pay attention to special provisions
Related services
What is a special investment fund?
Since 1996, it has been possible to establish special investment funds. Before that, various limitations set by legislation made it in practice difficult to develop products relating to special investment funds. Previously, special investment funds have typically been almost like UCITS funds and have only to a lesser degree deviated, for example, from the diversification rules of UCITS funds. However, since the Act on Alternative Investment Fund Managers entered into force, it has been possible to establish special investment funds.
Special investment funds are one possible legal structure for Alternative Investment Funds (AIF), and the related provisions are laid down in the Act on Alternative Investment Fund Managers. Special investment funds are contractual funds that are not legal persons. Investment activities and management of special investment funds are carried out by the Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) who does however not own the special investment funds under its management. Instead the right of ownership to the assets in the special investment fund remains with the persons, entities and other legal arrangements that have invested their money in the fund. A special investment fund is divided into fund units that create equal rights to the capital in the fund. The fund units can be further divided into fractions. A special investment fund cannot conclude contracts, but they are concluded by the AIFM representing the special investment fund.
Generally, there is very little regulation on the investment activities of AIFs, and it mainly concerns the AIFM. Special investment funds deviate from AIFs having some other legal structure in that the investment policy is regulated in more detail for special investment funds than other legal structures. Secondly, they also deviate from AIFs with some other legal structure by their taxation because in Finland, the taxation of funds is determined based on the legal structure. It is also typical for special investment funds that certain provisions of the Act on Common Funds (213/2019) apply to them, such as certain provisions on fund management and calculation of the value.
A closed-end special investment fund is widely suitable for various needs
In Finland, closed-end funds, from which it is not possible to redeem fund units, have typically been established as limited partnerships. Due to their flexibility under private law, limited partnerships suit the needs of closed-end funds relatively well. However, limited partnerships have some characteristics that are not optimal for the needs of investmend funds, such as relatively heavy administration and complicated documentation.
Special investment funds in closed-end form have lately become more common in Finland. A special investment fund structure is widely suitable for funds with different investments strategies, for example traditional private equity funds but also feeder funds or funds of funds.
Establishing non-UCITS funds is more straightforward than establishing limited partnerships
The board of directors of the AIFM decides on the establishment of a non-UCITS fund. Establishing an AIF is more straightforward than establishing a limited partnership fund that needs a limited liability company to act as the general partner. A separate general partner company is typically established for each limited partnership fund for risk management reasons. Managing several general partner companies may pose challenges as the number of funds under management increases. In contrast, a non-UCITS fund does not have a general partner company, but the AIFM can establish several non-UCITS funds or investment compartments, which brings synergies to the administration. The assets and obligations of a non-UCITS fund have been separated from the AIFM under law so the AIFM cannot become liable for the obligations of the non-UCITS fund, and the owners of the fund units cannot become liable for the obligations of the AIFM.
Simple company structure makes management more efficient
Due to the simple company structure, the management of non-UCITS funds is more efficient than the management of limited partnerships. There is also no obligation to make notifications of changes in investors to the Trade Register. The typical elements in the management of closed-end funds can be determined in the fund’s rules. These include, among other things, the investors’ voting rights in matters that have been agreed separately as well as the advisory committee. In non-UCITS funds, it is also possible to use an investment compartment structure, which is not possible in limited partnerships. With an investment compartment structure, it is possible to create more economies of scale in the management.
Clearer documentation to make fund management more flexible
The fund rules are the non-UCITS fund’s instruments of incorporation. It is not necessary to draft a public partnership agreement, a summary of the detailed fund agreement, which is a specialty of limited partnerships. The rules of a non-UCITS fund are not public. In closed-end non-UCITS funds, it is possible to agree on preferential treatment of certain investors in the same way as in limited partnership funds. This is important in order to properly account for the special needs of the different investor groups. A fund prospectus can also be drafted of a non-UCITS fund. In closed-end non-UCITS funds, investors usually provide their investment commitments with a separate subscription agreement.
The special characteristics of the non-UCITS funds also provide new possibilities in marketing
Due to their simple structure, non-UCITS funds may be easier to market to non-professional investors. Certain investor groups also appreciate the fact that the identity of shareholders is not public knowledge, unlike in limited partnership funds. A non-UCITS fund is often suitable for investor groups for which it is not profitable to invest in limited partnership funds for tax-related or other reasons. In that case, the non-UCITS fund may make it possible to avoid establishing a feeder fund tailored for certain special investor groups (such as a limited partnership with a profit-sharing loan), which provides cost savings and streamlines the administration. Due to sustainability aspects, some investor groups may also avoid complicated feeder fund structures that aim at optimising taxation, which has increased the interest in non-UCITS funds. The investment compartment structure also provides other structuring possibilities, which have previously not been used in Finland.
The impacts of special provisions should be accounted for when planning the fund structure
Despite the numerous advantages, it is recommended to account for the impacts of special provisions concerning non-UCITS funds when planning the fund structure. The regulation concerning non-UCITS funds decreases the need to determine everything in detail in the fund rules, but it also sets certain boundary conditions for the fund’s operations. For example, the impact of the regulation concerning the number of investors, ways to organise the distribution of profit and adapting the share-based system of the non-UCITS fund to match the fund’s needs are matters that usually require some consideration in closed-end non-UCITS funds. By planning the fund structure carefully and developing the rules in an innovative manner, a non-UCITS fund can be adapted to the needs of a closed-end fund so that the outcome can be a viable alternative for establishing a limited partnership fund.
Latest insights
Article published 13.5.2026 – Venture Capital & Minority Investments
Newly launched Series Seed 4.0 is a comprehensive standard seed financing documentation for the Finnish market
Article published 28.4.2026 – Private M&A
Unlocking value in carve-outs – Why integration planning deserves top priority in every carve-out
Article published 14.1.2026 – Tax & Structuring
VAT deductions for private equity investors under the microscope
Article published 7.11.2025 – Capital Markets & Public M&A
AIFMD II – implications for alternative investment fund managers in Finland
Jarno Tanhuanpää, Tuomas Honkinen & Jussi Mäkikangas
Benjamin Bade, Maiju Mäkinen & Samuli Salminen
Mikko Alakare & Lotta Manu
Hannu Huotilainen & Freja Harima
Latest references
Banyan Software – Acquisition of Carus Ferry
We acted as legal adviser to Banyan Software on its acquisition of Carus Ferry, a Finland-based provider of reservation, check-in and port operations software for ferry and passenger shipping operators. The acquisition further strengthens Banyan Software’s presence in the Nordic region while providing Carus with a long-term partner to support its continued growth and development. Carus was founded in 1998 and is headquartered in Mariehamn on the Åland Islands, Finland. The company develops mission-critical software for ferry, cruise and passenger shipping operators, covering the full passenger journey from booking and ticketing to capacity management, check-in and boarding. Carus also provides port automation, onboard sales systems and business information tools. The company serves approximately 30 operators across four continents and is the largest vendor by customer count in ferry reservation and departure control. Banyan Software is an acquirer and long-term operator of mission-critical software businesses serving specialised industries. Founded in 2016, Banyan follows a buy-and-hold-for-life approach and supports the long-term growth and development of its portfolio companies. Banyan operates more than 130 portfolio companies across North and South America, the United Kingdom, Europe and APAC. Following the acquisition of Carus, Banyan operates three businesses in the Nordic region.
Case published 20.10.2026
Move Energy – Combination of 3North Partners and Steady Energy and related private placement and IPO
We advised Move Energy as an investor in connection with the combination of 3North Partners Plc and Steady Energy Oy and the related private placement and initial public offering of the combined company on Nasdaq First North Growth Market Finland. In connection with the transaction, 3North Partners received approximately EUR 69.8 million in investor commitments from a group of institutional and other investors, including Move Energy, to fund the combined company. Steady Energy is a Finnish nuclear technology company developing a new generation of small modular reactors (SMRs) particularly suited for district heating. Its LDR-50 reactor is designed to provide cities and utilities with a scalable and low-carbon alternative to combustion-based heat production.
Case published 19.10.2026
Jolt Capital and Tesi – Investment in VEV
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
Topfoods – Acquisition of Delice Plus
We advised Topfoods Oy, a Triton-backed Geia Group company, on its acquisition of Oy Delice Plus Ab, a Finnish supplier of cakes and pastries. Through the acquisition, Topfoods strengthens its retail business and further reinforces its position in the cakes and pastries segment. Founded in 2008, Topfoods supplies selected food products to professional kitchens, the retail sector, and the food industry.
Case published 4.9.2026