27.3.2023

Product liability rules under reform in the EU

The EU’s relatively old Product Liability Directive (85/374/EEC), adopted already in 1985, has been under the review of the European Commission in recent years.

In its current form, the Product Liability Directive establishes strict, i.e., no-fault, liability of the producer for a damage caused to a natural person and to a property used mainly for private purposes, which is caused by insufficient safety of the producer’s ‘products’, i.e., mainly movable objects and electricity. In Finland, the Product Liability Directive was implemented with the Finnish Product Liability Act (694/1990, as amended).

In 2018, the European Commission evaluated the Product Liability Directive and concluded that, despite the passing of time, it has remained mainly efficient and relevant, but that it also has some shortcomings. Among other things, the identified shortcomings were related to the current Product Liability Directive not adequately addressing the challenges posed by digital development and circular economy.

To update the product liability rules, the European Commission published a proposal for a new directive on liability for defective products on 28 September 2022, which would repeal the current Product Liability Directive (the proposal is available here). In the same connection, the European Commission also published a proposal for a directive on AI liability (available here); however, the latter will not be discussed further in this blog.

Digital development and circular economy taken into account in the proposed new Product Liability Directive

The proposed new Product Liability Directive includes the following key changes:

  • The definition of a ‘product’ is extended to include both tangible and intangible products. The product liability rules would thus not only cover movables and electricity, but also software and digital manufacturing files which mean digital versions or digital templates of a movable. In future, product liability could therefore exist, for example, for a damage caused by software.
  • The concept of damage is extended to cover, for example, the loss or corruption of data that is not used exclusively for professional purposes. According to the proposal, there would also be no maximum or minimum EUR limits for the compensation in future.
  • Companies making substantial modifications to the products that have already been placed on the market or put into service are also covered by the product liability rules in future in order to take into account circular business models.
  • The burden of proof remains on the injured person, who has to prove the damage they have suffered, the defectiveness of the product and the causal link between these two. However, since especially in complex cases, the injured may have difficulties in proving the damage, the proposal contains various presumption rules to lighten the burden of proof.
  • In future, Member States would be required to publish court judgments relating to product liability so that, in the interests of a more harmonised interpretation of the product liability rules, other national courts can take these judgments into account.  

What next?

The legislation project in Finland is still in early stages. In Finland, the Legal Affairs Committee issued a statement on the proposal for a new Product Liability Directive at the end of 2022, and the matter will proceed to committee reading in the spring. The Government has deemed it important that the product liability rules are updated to better reflect the impact of the digital age as well as the effects of circular economy and global value chains, but it also deemed that the proposal included a number of questions that require further discussion. The precise timeline of the legislation project has not yet been published, but the preparatory work will continue both at the EU level and the national level in the spring of 2023.

Latest references

We advised Valio Oy in its acquisition of Raisio Oyj’s plant protein business, related fixed assets and the Härkis® and Beanit® fava bean brands. The fixed assets include, among other things, the production equipment of the factory that makes plant protein products in Kauhava. The transaction supports Valio’s strategy to grow from a dairy company to a food company. This business acquisition will make us an even more significant developer and producer of plant-based protein products. The demand for these products will grow in the long term, and a great deal of growth potential still remains. In 2022, we acquired the Gold&Green® business and, since then, we have been carrying out strong product development and renewed the brand. Following successful product launches, sales in the last quarter of 2024 increased by about 50% from the previous quarter. With this acquisition, we are building our own production capacity. The production equipment of the Kauhava factory is just right for our needs and situation. says Kimmo Luoma, Valio’s Senior Vice President. Valio is a Finnish dairy and food company founded in 1905 and owned by Finnish dairy cooperatives. Valio has subsidiaries in Sweden, Estonia, the United States and China. In 2023, the Group had a turnover of EUR 2 278 million and more than 4 000 employees.
Case published 14.2.2025
We successfully represented Arctic Biomaterials Oy before the Finnish Market Court in an extensive dispute concerning alleged patent infringement and invalidity of the patent-in-suit. Our client has invented next-generation bioabsorbable composites that are engineered with Arctic Biomaterials’ X3 bioactive natural mineral fibers, offering robust, bioactive reinforcement for orthopedic implants. These advanced composites empower customers to create high-strength bioabsorbable solutions for the most demanding applications. Back in 2019, Purac Biochem B.V. alleged, among other things, that our client’s Evolvecomp product had infringed Purac Biochem B.V.’s European patent validated in Finland protecting a biocompatible composite and its use. Purac Biochem B.V. filed a preliminary injunction against our client under the Act on Securing the Provision of Evidence in Civil Cases Concerning Industrial Property Rights and Copyright (344/2000). The Finnish Market Court issued an ex-parte injunction against our client on 2 April 2019 (MAO:150/19) and a final injunction on 19 February 2020 (MAO:59/20). Our client had disputed Purac Biochem B.V.’s patent infringement claim from the beginning and claimed that the patent-in-suit was invalid. After five years of litigation, the Finnish Market Court handed down a ruling in the joined invalidity and infringement cases on 10 October 2024 (MAO:560/2024 and MAO:561/2024) declaring Purac Biochem B.V.’s patent invalid and dismissing Purac’s infringement action against Arctic Biomaterials. Also, the preliminary injunction based on an alleged patent infringement imposed against Arctic Biomaterials was cancelled. The Market Court declared Purac Biochem B.V.’s patent invalid due to a lack of inventive step. The Market Court applied the could-would method for determining whether the patent-in-suit is inventive or not. The could-would method is based on determining whether a person skilled in the art would (not simply could, but would) have made a specific improvement to prior solutions, based on the available prior art. The Market Court ruled that it would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art to solve the objective technical problem of the patent-in-suit in the manner presented in claim 1, using as a starting point the closest prior art (prior patent publication) and combining it with the teaching of another prior art publication. The decision is final.
Case published 29.1.2025
We acted as Finnish counsel to Pernod Ricard in the sale of a portfolio of local Nordic brands to Oy Hartwall Ab, an affiliate of the Danish group Royal Unibrew. Pernod Ricard is a worldwide leader in the spirits and wine industry. The local portfolio of brands includes spirits, liqueurs and Finnish wine brands, the best-known being the liqueur Minttu, along with their related production assets based in Turku, Finland. The closing of the transaction remains subject to customary conditions.
Case published 21.10.2024
We are acting as the lead counsel to Fortum in a cross-border transaction in which Fortum is selling its recycling and waste business. The business is sold to thematic impact investing firm Summa Equity through its portfolio company NG Group. The debt-free purchase price is approximately EUR 800 million. The transaction is subject to authority approval and customary closing conditions. Fortum’s recycling and waste business to be sold comprises municipal and industrial waste management and end-to-end plastics, metals, ash, slag and hazardous waste treatment and recycling services. These businesses are located in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway and currently employ approximately 900 employees.
Case published 18.7.2024