14.7.2023

Permitting hydrogen projects in a changing operating environment – what should be taken into account when establishing a production plant?

Green hydrogen is planned to replace fossil fuels, particularly in industries that are difficult to electrify. In Finland, hydrogen projects of approximately EUR 11.7 billion are being planned.

The legislation in force does not take the special characteristics of hydrogen projects into account in all respects, and new legislative initiatives or authority guidelines have not been issued yet. This is the first part of our two-part blog that discusses the different aspects of permits for hydrogen production.

Permitting a hydrogen production plant

A hydrogen production plant may require, for example, the following procedures and authority permits:

If a production plant is constructed, for example, on the same site with a carbon dioxide storage or if the plant will process hydrogen into methanol, methane or ammonia, these functions may affect the permit procedure of the project. Constructing a hydrogen production plant may in some cases also require other authority permits.

1. Environmental impact assessment procedure

First, a hydrogen production plant may require an environmental impact assessment procedure if the project is mentioned in Annex 1 of the Act on Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure, i.e. in the list of projects, or if the project is likely to have significant environmental impacts comparable in type and extent to those of the projects referred to in the Annex. A hydrogen production plant may require an environmental impact assessment procedure based on section 6 c) of the list of projects, which concerns integrated chemical installations for industrial scale manufacture of substances using chemical conversion processes and which are for the production of inorganic chemicals, among other things.

Pursuant to the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive, chemical conversion processes means a process with one or more chemical reactions and integrated chemical installations means an installation, in which several units are juxtaposed and are functionally linked to one another. Based on the section above, a hydrogen production plant that also produces methane, for example, could require an EIA procedure. The definition of industrial scale, on the other hand, is identical with the definition in the Industrial Emissions Directive. According to the European Commission’s guidelines on the interpretation of the Industrial Emissions Directive, for example, the nature of the product, the industrial character of the plant and machinery used, the production volume and the commercial purpose should be taken into account when determining the scale.

2. Environmental permit

A hydrogen production plant may also require an environmental permit because the production of hydrogen by chemical or biological processing on an industrial scale is subject to an environmental permit pursuant to Annex 1, table 1, section 4 a) of the Environmental Protection Act. When estimating the scale of the operations, aspects relating to the definition of industrial scale will be taken into consideration.

The environmental permit requirements for hydrogen production plants may change in the near future because the Industrial Emissions Directive, which the Environmental Protection Act is partially based on, is being reformed. In its negotiating position, the Council of the European Union has proposed that production of hydrogen via water electrolysis would only require an environmental permit if the daily production capacity exceeds 60 tonnes. After the European Parliament has formed its view on the reform of the Industrial Emissions Directive, the proposed directive will be negotiated between the institutions.

Pursuant to section 2 a 0f the Act on Processing Environmental and Water Matters in Regional State Administrative Agencies, environmental permit applications concerning the production and utilisation of hydrogen must be prioritised in the Regional State Administrative Agencies. Pursuant to section 197 a of the Environmental Protection Act, matters concerning the aforementioned applications must be processed as urgent. The provisions are in force for a fixed term. We discussed green transition projects in our blog post on 3 June 2022.

3. Chemical Permit

Hydrogen is a dangerous chemical referred to in the Act on Safety in Connection with Handling of Dangerous Chemicals and Explosive Products, and large-scale industrial handling and storage of hydrogen is only allowed with a permit granted by the Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency. Even if the handling and storage of hydrogen is not considered large-scale, the operator is still obligated to submit a notice of minor-scale industrial and handling of a dangerous chemical.

Latest references

Castrén & Snellman acted as legal advisor to Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A. in its capacity as sole lender and hedging bank providing senior financing to Olana Energy for a Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) portfolio in Finland. Our advice included preparing a legal due diligence report on the projects as well as advising on the negotiation of the various finance and project agreements. Olana Energy is a management-owned fast-growing independent power producer with an international pipeline of over 1 GW. The diversified portfolio of assets ranging from 5 to 30 MW reinforces the Finnish grid at a granular level.
Case published 18.11.2025
Castrén & Snellman was commissioned by the Ministry of the Environment to carry out a study on how the Circular Economy Act could be used to promote circular economy aspects in public procurement. Our report provides valuable information to the working group tasked with preparing the new Circular Economy Act. The report includes an overview of relevant strategies, action programmes and policies, a look at relevant legislation and case law, an assessment of the current state of circular economy procurement and examples of integrating circular economy aspects into public procurement from around the world. We end the report with concrete conclusions and a proposal for a new circular economy provision with justification. The proposal aims to maximise the regulation’s effectiveness and minimise any adverse side effects. The final report is available on the Circular Economy Act project’s Gateway to Information (in Finnish). The study was carried out by Anna Kuusniemi-Laine, Sanna Aalto-Setälä, Lotta Huhtamäki, Marja Ollila, Laura Vuorinen, Paavo Heinonen and Anna Ylitalo.
Case published 11.11.2025
Castrén & Snellman acted as legal advisor to Suomen Aurinkovoima Oy and its owners in a financing tender process and a financing arrangement implemented with Danske Bank to secure financing for the company’s future solar park projects. Suomen Aurinkovoima, established by Oulun Seudun Sähkö, Oulun Energia, Vantaan Energia and Savon Voima, is a company focused on increasing domestic solar power. The company manages solar park projects from planning to implementation and maintenance, and its goal is to build dozens of new solar parks across Finland by 2030.
Case published 22.10.2025
We are acting as the joint legal advisor to Oomi Oy and Lumme Energia Oy in a transaction whereby Lumme Energia will merge with Oomi. As from the completion of the merger, the combined entity will be the largest electricity retail and service company in the Finnish market. In 2024, Oomi reported a turnover of EUR 373.9 million and had approximately 110 employees. Lumme Energia’s turnover for the same year was approximately EUR 314.6 million and it had approximately 50 employees. The transaction is primarily driven by the recent developments in the electricity market and the strategic goal to develop competitive products and services. Another key objective is to further enhance the customer experience, which is a shared value between the two companies. As a result of the merger, Lumme Energia’s customers will transfer to Oomi, and Lumme Energia will become one of Oomi’s shareholders. The completion of the transaction is subject to an approval by the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority.
Case published 29.8.2025