14.9.2020

Occupational Safety in the Time of COVID-19 – What Every Employer Needs to Know

With over 20 million confirmed coronavirus infections worldwide, the debate in Finland has turned to whether a second wave of infections is on its way or whether it is already here. Whatever the case, at this point it seems unlikely that society would be locked down as fully as last spring.

The pandemic has given rise to many questions among our clients. In this post, we cover the some of the most common questions relating to occupational safety.

Can an Employee Leave off Work if They Are Afraid of the Coronavirus or Are in a High-Risk Group?

An employee’s fear of contracting the coronavirus is not, as a rule, a reason to leave off work. The Occupational Safety and Health Act gives an employee the right to leave off work if the work causes a serious risk to an employee’s own or other employees’ life or health.

However, the threshold for applying this provision is quite high. The right to leave off work can only be exercised in exceptional circumstances in which the risk is real and serious. Having an underlying condition that increases the risk of contracting the serious form of the coronavirus does not automatically entitle an employee to leave off work.

Furthermore, the right to leave off work is not available if the risk can be avoided by improving occupational safety. Indeed, occupational safety measures taken by the employer are always the primary means of resolving this kind of situation.

What Occupational Safety Tools Does the Employer Have?

Employers are required to take care of the safety and health of their employees while at work. The point of departure is that the employer must identify risks and hazards in the work environment and seek to eliminate them or, if this is not possible, minimise them. Based on a risk assessment, the employer must plan how the risks caused by the coronavirus in the workplace will be managed.

The concrete measures available vary depending on the working conditions. When planning measures, employers should also take into account personal factors relating to employees, such as being in a high-risk group. Careful consideration should also be given to how binding to make the measures: the employer must decide whether measures at the workplace are recommendations or whether to exercise its right of direction to make them binding orders.

Concrete measures can include:

For example, the risk assessment may show that minimising hazards requires an obligation to wear a mask at the workplace. In this case, it is the employer’s responsibility to provide the employees with instructions on using masks, to procure masks for the workplace and to bear the costs relating to the masks.

What Are the Employees’ Obligations?

Employees are obligated to comply with their employer’s instructions and to otherwise promote the safety of the work environment through their own actions. In any work community, there may be individual employees who react negatively to new instructions. It is important that employers reinforce their work safety orders using the measures available under employment law.

Summary of Employer Work Safety Obligations

The question of whether an employer has fulfilled its work safety obligations is often tested in trials.

In short, the work safety measures that employers should take due to the coronavirus are:

Employers also have to take the coronavirus into account as part of the company’s occupational safety processes. Now might be a good time to review your company’s occupational safety processes as a whole and make sure they are up to date.

 

Eveliina Tammela
Lisa Litvin

Latest references

We are acting as the joint legal advisor to Oomi Oy and Lumme Energia Oy in a transaction whereby Lumme Energia will merge with Oomi. As from the completion of the merger, the combined entity will be the largest electricity retail and service company in the Finnish market. In 2024, Oomi reported a turnover of EUR 373.9 million and had approximately 110 employees. Lumme Energia’s turnover for the same year was approximately EUR 314.6 million and it had approximately 50 employees. The transaction is primarily driven by the recent developments in the electricity market and the strategic goal to develop competitive products and services. Another key objective is to further enhance the customer experience, which is a shared value between the two companies. As a result of the merger, Lumme Energia’s customers will transfer to Oomi, and Lumme Energia will become one of Oomi’s shareholders. The completion of the transaction is subject to an approval by the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority.
Case published 29.8.2025
We acted as Finnish legal advisor to HANZA AB in connection with its acquisition of the contract manufacturing division of Milectria, a group of companies specialising in electrical systems for the defence industry.  The transaction comprises 100% of the shares in Milectria Oy (Finland), Milectria OÜ (Estonia), and the real estate company Kiinteistö Oy Kanungin Karhu. The transaction is expected to close in September 2025, subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals.  Founded in 2008, HANZA is a Swedish mechanical engineering and electronics contract manufacturing company listed on the Nasdaq Stockholm main list. The company operating in seven countries currently has annual sales of approximately SEK 6 billion and approximately 3,100 employees. Milectria is a Finnish contract manufacturer of electrical systems for the defence industry.
Case published 21.7.2025
We advised Nevel Oy in its acquisition of the business of Labio Oy. Lahti Aqua Oy and Salpakierto Oy sold their entire shareholdings in Labio to Nevel, expanding Nevel’s already significant biogas portfolio. The transaction will have no impact on Lahti Aqua’s water utility operations or Salpakierto’s municipal waste management responsibilities. Labio’s operations and customer relationships will continue as before. ‘This partnership is a natural next step for us as we continue investing in sustainable material efficiency and renewable energy solutions. By integrating Labio’s comprehensive offerings and expertise, we can provide customers with a strong platform for material circularity. We are also strengthening our market position as one of Finland’s leading material efficiency solution providers,’ says Ville Koikkalainen, Director of Industrial and Biogas Business at Nevel. Nevel is an energy infrastructure company offering advanced, climate-positive solutions for industry and real estate. It operates more than 130 energy production plants and manages over 40 district heating networks. Nevel’s annual turnover is EUR 150 million, and it employs 190 experts in Finland, Sweden and Estonia.
Case published 16.7.2025
We advised Pihlajalinna Plc on an arrangement whereby Pihlajalinna Terveys Oy and Ikipihlaja Setälänpiha Oy sold their special housing services business to Esperi Care Oy.  The transaction involved three Pihlajalinna Uniikki units in Hämeenlinna, Lohja and Riihimäki as well as Ikipihlaja Oiva in Raisio. As a result of the arrangement, more than 100 employees transferred to Esperi. Pihlajalinna is one of Finland’s leading private providers of social and healthcare services, offering a wide range of services to both private and public sector clients. Pihlajalinna has more than 160 locations across Finland.
Case published 2.6.2025