The Consumer Protection Act is set to see many amendments in the coming year. Some of the amendments are due to the national transposition of the EU’s Sale of Goods Directive (2019/771). Amendments are also being made to the Consumer Protection Act due to the Digital Content Directive (2019/770). These two directives are based on the EU’s Digital Single Market Strategy. One of the main goals of the strategy is to give consumers and businesses better access to online goods and services in Europe.
15.12.2021
Towards a Digital Single Market: Amendments to Consumer Protection Act in 2022
Hilma-Karoliina Rozell & Piia Raappana
Related services
A government proposal (HE 180/2021) for amendments to the Consumer Protection Act was given to Parliament in October 2021. The amendments are scheduled to enter into force on 1 January 2022. This bulletin looks at the amendments arising from the Sale of Goods Directive.
From Sale of Consumer Goods to Sale of Goods
The transposition of the Sale of Goods Directive requires amendments to chapter 5 of the Consumer Protection Act with respect to the sale of consumers goods, particularly to the provisions concerning the characteristics and defects of goods as well as the sanctions for defects. At the same time the title of the chapter will be changed from ‘Sale of consumer goods’ to ‘Sale of goods’.
As things currently stand, the main reforms to the sale of goods will be the following:
Position of Consumers Strengthened, More Care Required of Companies
The reforms have been presented as improving the ability of companies to sell and consumers to buy goods across borders between EU and EEA countries. However, the positive impacts on cross-border trade are undermined by the fact that both directives ultimately allow a great deal of latitude on the national level, and only some of the provisions are harmonised.
In the sale of goods, the position of consumers in relation to seller companies will improve, at least to some extent, and companies may correspondingly be held responsible for defective goods more often. The more uniform sale of goods provisions that have been proposed will be particularly significant to companies engaging in e-commerce. In particular, the new provisions concerning the sale of goods with digital elements will require companies to exercise care.
It would be wise for companies to start reviewing their terms and conditions and guarantee terms in light of the new legislation if they have not already done so. For instance, the longer defect assumption period means that companies will no longer be able to offer consumers one-year guarantees as such, because a guarantee must provide genuine added value to consumers.
Latest news
Latest references
DNB Bank ASA – Lease and development of premises
We advised DNB Bank ASA in its agreement with Fennia Mutual Insurance Company on the development and lease of the premises at Fabianinkatu 8, Helsinki. With the lease agreement, DNB Bank ASA will focus all its Finnish operations at the Fabian 8 office. The other tenants at the renewed premises will be DNB Carnegie Investment Bank AB’s Finnish operations and DNB Auto Finance Oy. In connection with the long-term lease agreement, the parties also agreed on a major renovation project to completely refurbish the premises. The object of lease will be completed in the second half of 2027.
Case published 10.10.2025
Yellow Film Studios – Merger of Yellow Film Studios and REinvent Studios
We advised Yellow Film Studios, the largest independent film and television production company in the Nordics, in its strategic merger with Danish film industry sales and financing studio REinvent Studios. Together they form Reinvent Yellow, a unified hub for television and film production, sales, financing and innovation, combining over three decades of production experience and a vast catalogue of titles.
Case published 8.10.2025
International reinsurance companies – Ad hoc arbitration proceedings
We successfully represented a panel of reinsurance companies in an international ad hoc arbitration. The dispute arose out of a reinsurance treaty under the terms of which the reinsurers had reinsured a portfolio of risks underwritten by the cedent. The parties disagreed as to whether the reinsurance provided coverage for a certain loss that had occurred because of the market turmoil caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The case involved highly complex legal and contractual questions requiring special expertise on reinsurance law and practice. The arbitral tribunal rejected the counterparty’s claims for reinsurance compensation against our clients in full. The amount in dispute was approximately EUR 34 million.
Case published 16.9.2025
byFounders.vc – DataCrunch’s USD 64 million Series A funding round
We supported byFounders.vc as the Finnish counsel in their investment in DataCrunch Oy in a USD 64 million Series A funding round. DataCrunch provides scalable AI compute solutions from energy-efficient data centers in Iceland and Finland. byFounders.vc is the community-powered early-stage venture fund investing in globally ambitious teams connected to the Nordic and Baltic countries.
Case published 11.9.2025