19.12.2022

Finland proposes a new windfall tax act

On 2 December 2022, a draft proposal for a temporary tax on the profits of firms in the electricity and fossil fuels sector was sent out for consultation by the Ministry of Finance. Pursuant to the proposal, the tax would be paid by certain companies in the electricity sector operating in the Finnish market and certain companies in the fossil fuels sector. The taxable profits would be subject to a 33% tax rate. The proposed tax would be collected in addition to the usual corporate income tax (20%), and it would be paid to the state. The profit tax would not be tax deductible for the company.

Companies subject to tax

The windfall tax would apply to those companies in the electricity sector that are active in the generation or supply of electricity. In addition to electricity producers, wholesalers and retailers would thus be liable to this tax as well. It is worth noting that in this respect, the proposal would deviate from the European Union Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 on which it is based and which requires the application of a cap on revenues to electricity producers. However, the proposed tax would only apply to operators whose generation and supply operations exceed the limits for operations of minor significance laid down in the Decree of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment on the unbundling of electricity business (1305/2019). In case of group companies, tax liability would be determined for each company separately. In other words, the assessment of whether the limit for operations of minor significance is exceeded would be done on a company-specific basis.

Among the companies in the fossil fuel sector, windfall tax would be applied to those with over 75% of their turnover coming from crude oil or natural gas production, refined products of crude oil or coal products.

Determination of taxable profit

For companies in the electricity sector within the scope of application of the proposed tax, the tax would be calculated based on the results of electricity operations other than electricity system operations (‘electricity operations’). Any profit generated by a permanent establishment abroad would not be taken into account when calculating the results of the electricity operations. The results of the electricity operations would refer to the difference between the taxable income of the electricity business and the deductible expenses and other deductible amounts recognised in the tax year. With a few exceptions, the taxability of income and the deductibility of expenses, as well as the recognition of income and expenses, would be determined in accordance with the Act on the Taxation of Business Income. However, the part of the electricity operations’ profit that corresponds to a 5% annual profit calculated on the equity stated in the balance sheet of the electricity business would not be subject to tax. The aim of the exclusion of a 5% return on capital is to avoid an adverse impact on the investments in electricity production. The novelty lies in using the results of the ‘electricity operations’ to determine the profit subject to tax, and the interpretation issues that will potentially arise from this will likely need to be resolved in case law.

As for the companies in the fossil fuel sector within the scope of application of the proposed tax, they would pay tax on the part of their result of operations exceeding a 5% annual profit calculated on the equity stated in the balance sheet. The assets and liabilities of a permanent establishment would not be taken into account when calculating this five percent annual profit. As the companies in the fossil fuel sector have no similar unbundling obligations as the electricity sector companies, the profit would be calculated based on the company’s entire result of operations, i.e. the difference between the income and expenses during the tax year.

What next?

The consultation period ended on 12 December 2022. The new windfall tax act and the related amendments on the Act on the Taxation of Business Income are intended to enter into force as soon as possible. In accordance with the proposal, the tax would apply to any profits concerning tax year 2023. In practice, the tax would be collected afterwards during 2024. Due to the urgency of the proposal, it is likely that the legislative drafting will proceed swiftly once the consultation has ended. Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2022/1854, Member States shall adopt and publish measures implementing the solidarity contribution by 31 December 2022. The provisions of said Regulation regarding the cap on electricity producers’ revenues became applicable on 1 December 2022. The proposal is expected to be submitted to the Parliament in the last week of the year.

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy. 
Case published 9.9.2026