19.5.2016

Legal Transplants Part III: Fitness for Purpose

My previous post on legal transplants focused on endeavours clauses and concurrent delays in a Finnish law context. Fitness for purpose is another legal transplant that is of particular interest in international construction and supply contracts.

Fitness for Purpose Warranties

Fitness for purpose warranties and representations are frequently discussed in the context of international supply and construction contracts, both under English law and Finnish law. Fitness for purpose warranties mean, in general, that the contractor or supplier guarantees that when completed, the end product will be fit for its intended purpose. In Finnish, a direct translation is that the end product ‘soveltuu käyttötarkoitukseensa’.

 

A UK Perspective

Under English law, fitness for purpose warranties are considered problematic, since they impose on a party a high standard of guaranteeing a certain outcome. A main root of the problem under UK law seems to be the higher standard of care that the warranty imposes on the guaranteeing party as opposed to the standard of care that otherwise would apply. As described in this article, the requirement of a higher standard of care can also cause problems from the professional indemnity insurance perspective.

This may be one of the reasons that any fitness for purpose warranty is usually preceded by lengthy negotiations and may also involve a higher contract price for the works or supply in question.

Fitness for Purpose Warranties under Finnish Law

As I explained in my previous post on endeavours clauses, international contracts that are governed by Finnish law are quite standardly written in English. However, there is no established independent meaning for the concept of ‘fitness for purpose’ under Finnish law, nor is there any exact equivalent for the concept in Finnish jurisprudence. Under Finnish law, the phrase would generally be given its natural meaning – the party giving the warranty guarantees that the end product will be suitable for its intended purpose.

On the one hand, fitness for purpose under Finnish law comprises a contractual obligation like any other, and it may be explicitly stated in or implied by the contract. The essential question in general is the existence of (and showing) the alleged breach of contract or lack of the same. Under Finnish law, ultimately, the question boils down to (1) whether or not the end product needs to be fit for purpose in the first place and, if so, (2) whether it in fact is fit for its purpose.

On the other hand, in case of warranties, under Finnish law, the burden of proof is generally reversed as opposed to what it would be in case of a ‘normal’ contractual obligation. This means that in case of a claim under a fitness for purpose guarantee, under Finnish law, it is up to the contractor to show that the product is not defective if he wants to avoid liability. Usually, this requires showing an alternative cause for the alleged defect that the Contractor is not liable for.

Concluding Remarks

Fitness for purpose warranties are a very interesting example of the interfaces between different jurisdictions. The possibility of different interpretations is of particular importance to note with regard to fitness for purpose warranties, as the lengthy negotiations and potentially higher contract price involved can often lead to excess cost and prolonged negotiations.

To avoid this, all parties should investigate the actual meaning of the phrase under the applicable law – and ensure that it is understood in the same way by all parties – before entering into negotiations under a foreign law or with parties from different jurisdictions. This also decreases the risk of disputes later on as to what de facto was meant by the wording.

For common law discussion, see the following articles:

Simmons & Simmons: Fitness for Purpose in English construction contracts
Simmons & Simmons: Fitness for Purpose, Michael Polling Speaking Notes 

Latest references

Castrén & Snellman is acting as the legal advisor to the City of Pori in its sale of a 49% stake in Pori Energia to Polhem Infra. Pori Energia, a multi-utility company, operates in various sectors including district heating, electricity distribution, and electricity generation through CHP and renewable sources. The company also provides wind power services and industrial energy solutions in the Satakunta region. This strategic partnership between the City of Pori and Polhem Infra aims to enhance Pori Energia’s financial stability and investment capabilities, enabling the company to further its efforts in the energy transition and continue delivering high-quality energy services to its customers. Polhem Infra, owned by Swedish state pension funds, focuses on investments in critical infrastructure, including renewable electricity generation, energy storage, energy distribution, digital infrastructure, and transport infrastructure. The transaction values Pori Energia at EUR 905 million. 
Case published 31.1.2025
We successfully represented a Finnish manufacturing company in arbitration proceedings under the SCC rules against a global construction company. The dispute was governed by Finnish law and the seat of arbitration was Stockholm, Sweden. The dispute mainly concerned the termination of an erection contract and the right to compensation for delays of the project and for cost increases due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The main questions in dispute were the lawfulness of the termination of the erection contract as well as the consequences of the termination such as the right to costs to complete the project after termination, the right to liquidated damages for delay of the project and adjustment of contract price due to cost increases. The total value of the dispute exceeded EUR 15 million.
Case published 8.1.2025
We are advising Oomi Oy in a business transaction whereby KSS Energia Oy’s consumer and business customers in the retail sale of electricity will be transferred to Oomi. The transfer is scheduled to take place in March 2025. The arrangement requires approval from the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority. Oomi Oy is one of the largest energy service companies and electricity sellers in Finland. The arrangement is a result of the recent development of the electricity market and Oomi’s strategy, which aims to offer customers a seamless and improved digital customer experience.
Case published 20.12.2024
We are acting as the lead counsel to Fortum in a cross-border transaction in which Fortum is selling its recycling and waste business. The business is sold to thematic impact investing firm Summa Equity through its portfolio company NG Group. The debt-free purchase price is approximately EUR 800 million. The transaction is subject to authority approval and customary closing conditions. Fortum’s recycling and waste business to be sold comprises municipal and industrial waste management and end-to-end plastics, metals, ash, slag and hazardous waste treatment and recycling services. These businesses are located in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway and currently employ approximately 900 employees.
Case published 18.7.2024