As an attorney, I have the opportunity to work closely with clients from many different industries. It is interesting to see that companies from seemingly completely different fields of business are actually facing quite similar transformational forces. In order to successfully navigate the current turbulent business landscape, companies need to transform and reshape their strategies, businesses and operational models. I believe that lawyers – both in-house and in private practice – can play an important role in facilitating these changes.
18.1.2019
Industries in Transformation – How Lawyers Can Help the Reshaping of Business
Samuli Tarkiainen
Drivers of Transformation
The challenges currently reshaping the markets, for example, in the fields of energy and banking, include the transfer from product centricity to customer centricity, the need for faster reaction times, increasing complexity, as well as advances in technology and digitalisation. All of these phenomena are actually very familiar to us lawyers in our own daily legal work.
Every lawyer has clients – be they internal customers for in-house lawyers or the clients of us attorneys – whom we seek to serve to the best of our abilities. Lawyers tend to master quick reaction times and continuously encounter very complex situations. We have also learned to live with uncertainty, which is inevitable in legal interpretation questions.
As for digital solutions, here at Castrén & Snellman, for example, we have automated our document production practices and are experimenting AI solutions in our projects. Our document management systems have been digital for almost two decades already!
On the Pulse of Business
Lawyers have the opportunity to be trusted partners and advisors to our colleagues in business positions. This is especially true of in-house lawyers: be it the legal department of a large corporation or the only lawyer in a smaller company, in-house lawyers get to work and interact with all parts of the organisation, from the boardroom to front-line sales and services.
On the other hand, we external counsel get to act in many different industries and have a front row seat to see the ongoing industry convergence. In these interactions, we have a unique opportunity to contribute to and facilitate concrete actions. Ideally, in-house and outside lawyers get to pool their experience in close cooperation for the benefit of the business.
Lawyers as Integrators
According to several studies, professionals who regularly work with various different stakeholders within an organisation can have a strong positive impact by advising and connecting stakeholders to each other, which those stakeholders normally would not do. This is something that we lawyers should always keep in mind and do even more often. The same also applies to external networks: sometimes connecting persons from different firms may lead to new opportunities for all the parties involved.
Methodology
Dealing with legal matters often – and ideally – occurs before any problems actually arise. Therefore, a lawyer’s duty is to find out what the possible scenarios are that could occur in the future, and prepare the legal side of the business case accordingly. This could include formulating clauses in a contract to cover more or less anticipated scenarios or, for example, preparing a leak plan for an insider project of a listed company.
Due to the nature of legal work, lawyers often are able to ask the ‘painful’ questions. This is an essential part of a lawyer’s toolbox and should be used in a business-minded way.
Pioneering and Piloting
Lawyers can be creative, too. Perhaps not as creative as engineers or colleagues on the commercial side, but sometimes certain new practices or ways of working are adopted in corporate legal departments or law firms before other places. Legal teams are usually quite small compared to business side teams. This makes piloting and pioneering new practices quite easy for us lawyers. In the best case, piloted practices have the potential to be scaled up for the business lines, as well. Even in the worst case, the pilot may reach its end in the legal team based on critical feedback, which we lawyers are often quite eager to provide.
Shaping Future Business
Although the last couple of years have seen many good examples of in-house legal teams and external counsel contributing to the reshaping of businesses to meet evolving market demands, I believe that even more can and should be done. It is clear that the best results require cooperation between in-house and external lawyers. Based on my own empirical evidence, I can say that this can often be fun!
Latest insights
Article published 10.10.2024
Revolutionising legal services: Castrén & Snellman’s journey with AI integration
Article published 4.10.2024 – Environment, Energy & Green Transition
Government proposal for an act on offshore wind power in the exclusive economic zone submitted to Parliament
Article published 2.10.2024 – Banking & Finance
Sustainable finance is vital for achieving the objectives of the green transition
Article published 16.9.2024 – Banking & Finance
Private credit – an alternative to bank financing
Mia Ihamuotila
Marius af Schultén, Helinä Teittinen & Kanerva Sunila
Minna Korhonen & Lia Heasman
Tero Tuomisto, Minna Korhonen & Jenny Shahnovskij
Latest references
WithSecure – Sale of open source data collection product and business
We advised WithSecure Oyj in the sale of its open source data collection product and business to Patria Oyj. The divested business combining software and services falls outside WithSecure’s current strategy. Through the sale, WithSecure sharpens its focus on the Elements portfolio. WithSecure is a global cyber security company (listed on NASDAQ OMX Helsinki) with more than 35 years of industry experience. WithSecure offers partners flexible commercial models, ensuring mutual success across the dynamic cyber security landscape. Patria is an international company in the defence and security industry offering defence, security and aviation life cycle support services and technology solutions. As a result of the transaction, Patria will open a new office in Oulu and 10 WithSecure experts currently working in the business area will join Patria.
Case published 30.9.2024
A. Ahlström – ESG advisory and corporate sustainability due diligence process planning
We advised A. Ahlström in establishing a corporate sustainability due diligence process plan which incorporates best practices and tailored solutions based on our expertise within relevant business sectors. Our comprehensive ESG offering also included tailored training for members of the investment team and management team and the board of directors of several portfolio companies. ‘The ESG team at Castrén & Snellman provided us with legal and practical advice around the ESG regulatory tsunami that we need to incorporate in our ESG work,’ comments Camilla Sågbom, Director, Sustainability and Communications, at A. Ahlström Oy. A. Ahlström is a family-owned industrial company, developing leading global specialist positions in Forest & Fiber and Environmental technology sectors.
Case published 5.9.2024
Vapaus Bikes Finland – Series A funding round
We represented Vapaus Bikes Finland Oy, a company offering employee benefit bikes, in its international EUR 10 million Series A funding round. The investors behind the funding are private equity investors Shift4Good and Superhero Capital Ltd as well as Tesi together with the European Guarantee Fund of the European Investment Bank. The equity-based funding will support the company’s international expansion, software development, platform automation, and the growth of its concept for the second-hand market of bikes. Vapaus Bikes Finland is at the forefront of sustainable mobility services and has been a pioneer in the Employee Benefit Bikes sector since late 2020. It has been ranked among Finland’s fastest growing companies. Shift4Good is an impact venture capital fund focused on the decarbonisation of the transportation sector. Tesi (officially Finnish Industry Investment Ltd) is a state-owned, market-driven investment company that invests in venture capital and private equity funds and directly in Finnish startups and growth companies.
Case published 21.8.2024
City of Rovaniemi – Former employees ordered to pay damages in an investment decision matter
We successfully acted for the City of Rovaniemi in a matter concerning offence in public office and damages claims in relation to a significant investment decision made by the city. The defendants were the city’s former municipal corporate officer, who was in an employment relationship, and a city treasurer, who was in a public-service employment relationship and acted as the supervisor of the municipal corporate officer. The criminal matter related to the City Board’s decision to invest EUR 2 million of the city’s funds in bonds offered by a newly established investment company in accordance with a decision prepared by the defendants. A significant part of the company’s operations involved quick loan business. The main legal question in the matter was whether the investment of public funds constitutes an exercise of public authority and whether regulation on offences in public office therefore becomes applicable even to a person in an employment relationship. The municipal corporate officer in an employment relationship was charged with aggravated abuse of public office based on her negligence in the preparation and presentation of the investment decision as well as based on a conflict of interest due to the fact that she had invested her own money in a company that received funding from the investment target presented to the City Board. The charges of an offence in public office against the city treasurer concerned his position as the supervisor and reporter of the city’s investment activities. He was also involved in the preparation and presentation of the City Board’s decision. The processing of the matter started in the District Court of Lapland in June 2022. In its judgment given in August 2022, the District Court stated, based among other things on our argumentation, that the investment of public funds constitutes an exercise of public authority and that regulation on offences in public office can therefore be applied to the municipal corporate officer. The District Court deemed that the conduct of the former municipal corporate officer fulfils the characteristics of abuse of public office and that the conduct of the former city treasurer fulfils the characteristics of violation of official duty with respect to the preparation of the investment decision, but the right to bring charges had become time-barred. Punishments could therefore not be imposed on the defendants, but the defendants were ordered to jointly and severally pay the city approximately EUR 114,000 in damages plus interest for late payment. The city treasurer’s share of the amount was 10%. The prosecutor accepted the judgment but the other parties appealed it to the Court of Appeal. Acting for the city, we pursued claims for both punishment and damages in the Court of Appeal. The Rovaniemi Court of Appeal processed the matter in November and December 2023. In its judgment given in June 2024, the Court of Appeal upheld the District Court’s judgment with respect to the abuse of public office and violation of official duty. The Court of Appeal deemed that the municipal corporate officer had failed in her duty to declare the conflict of interest. In addition, she had failed in her duty to ensure that the prepared decision was in compliance with the city’s investment guidelines and that it had been properly put out to tender. The Court of Appeal also found that the text of the investment proposal was insufficient and misleading and that the municipal corporate officer’s conduct was intentional. As regards the city treasurer, the Court of Appeal held that he had failed in his duty to ensure that the investment proposal to the City Board complied with the investment guidelines, that the presentation was not misleading and that risks were taken into account as required by the investment guidelines. With the judgement, the Court of Appeal took a clear position that abuse in public offices and when exercising public authority is not acceptable. The judgment is also significant as it declares that investing public funds constitutes an exercise of public authority and that the liability for acts in office therefore becomes applicable even to persons in employment relationships. In addition, a key question for the Court of Appeal to assess was defining the amount of economic damage in a matter related to investment activities. The Court of Appeal held based on our arguments that the conduct of the municipal corporate officer and the city treasurer had caused damage to the city. The Court of Appeal increased the amount of damages to EUR 210,000 with the city treasurer’s share limited to 10%. The amount was increased because the Court of Appeal deemed that the city had suffered damage not only in terms of the loss of capital but also in terms of the loss of estimated return on investment. The judgement is not final.
Case published 21.8.2024