26.9.2019

Does Your Strategy Encourage Competition on Merits?

Competition drives us to work more efficiently than others, to make superior products that are of higher quality, to serve our customers better and to generate more value for shareholders. This is competition on merits, the very core of competition.

Companies that believe in what they do care for their employees and customers and keep abreast of the changing world. This recipe for success ensures that the company will not face problems with competition law compliance.

Nevertheless, success also requires growth and collaboration. Many companies benefit from industry cooperation, but the decision how to cooperate and with whom requires careful thinking. You cannot join forces with your competitors to do things you could equally well do on your own. You cannot exchange information on factors that affect how you compete or ask about your competitors’ pricing strategies. The idea of free competition requires that everyone compete on their own merits.

Growth enhances efficiency and brings synergies. However, there are limits to growth in business. A very strong market position may hamper efficiency and innovation. If your company becomes dominant, competition law will restrict its freedom of contract and freedom to operate.

It is up to the management and board of directors to ensure that a company abides by the rules. This will be hard to achieve if the strategy guides the company in another direction or if the connections of the board members  limit effective competition. From this perspective, the Supreme Administrative Court’s  recent ruling on the bus cartel is a  decision all board members should read carefully.  It also states that the companies represented in the board of directors of the company will be held responsible for the infringement the board becomes aware of.  The ECN+ Directive, in turn, introduces changes to the national competition laws of the Member States that will entail more severe sanctions.

From time to time, companies should take a critical look at their strategies: Does our strategy rely on genuine competition and developing our own strengths? Do our partnerships promote efficiency, innovation and customer’s interest? This kind of competition will ultimately produce the best results for the company itself and for society as a whole.

Latest references

We are acting as Finnish advisor to Hanza AB relating to its acquisition of all the shares in Leden Group Oy. Hanza AB is a Swedish mechanical engineering and electronics contract manufacturing company listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange. Founded in 2008, the company has six manufacturing clusters in Sweden, Finland, Germany, Baltics, Central Europe and China and an annual turnover of approximately SEK 4.6 billion. Leden Group is a leading Finnish contract manufacturer specialising in sheet metal, machining and complex assembly. Leden Group has four production sites in Finland and one in Estonia and an annual turnover of approximately SEK 1.1 billion.  The closing of the transaction remains subject to authority approval and customary conditions.
Case published 13.12.2024
We are advising Helkama-Autokauppa Oy in the acquisition of the Škoda dealerships in Helsinki and Tampere from Hedin Automotive Finland. The transaction is subject to regulatory approval. Helkama-Autokauppa Oy operates as an independent dealer in the dealer network of Helkama-Auto Oy, the Finnish importer of Škoda cars, spare parts and accessories.
Case published 3.12.2024
We acted as Finnish counsel to Pernod Ricard in the sale of a portfolio of local Nordic brands to Oy Hartwall Ab, an affiliate of the Danish group Royal Unibrew. Pernod Ricard is a worldwide leader in the spirits and wine industry. The local portfolio of brands includes spirits, liqueurs and Finnish wine brands, the best-known being the liqueur Minttu, along with their related production assets based in Turku, Finland. The closing of the transaction remains subject to customary conditions.
Case published 21.10.2024
We are acting as the lead counsel to Fortum in a cross-border transaction in which Fortum is selling its recycling and waste business. The business is sold to thematic impact investing firm Summa Equity through its portfolio company NG Group. The debt-free purchase price is approximately EUR 800 million. The transaction is subject to authority approval and customary closing conditions. Fortum’s recycling and waste business to be sold comprises municipal and industrial waste management and end-to-end plastics, metals, ash, slag and hazardous waste treatment and recycling services. These businesses are located in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway and currently employ approximately 900 employees.
Case published 18.7.2024