8.4.2019

Corporate Social Responsibility Act–The Next Step in CSR Regulation?

The debate in Finland surrounding corporate social responsibility is quite vigorous at the moment due to a series of worrying revelations, for example, in the private healthcare sector. It is easy enough to criticise failures of judgment and the choices that led to them, but there has been far less talk about ways to obligate companies to behave responsibly through legal means.

The regulation of corporate social responsibility has traditionally been voluntary-based, and the related legislation focused on reporting and monitoring obligations. While it is true that soft-law mechanisms, such as voluntary frameworks, certificates and reporting serve to educate the public and provide responsible actors with welcome exposure, these approaches are often criticised as being toothless—and with good reason.

One solution to this could be an EU-wide corporate social responsibility act. With a binding act in place, it would no longer solely be up to consumers and investors to make good and ethical choices—companies themselves would have to genuinely shoulder their responsibility. Liability for damages along with civil and criminal sanctions would give the law some heft, and public trials would serve as a deterrent to bad actors and encourage parties injured by irresponsible behaviour to seek legal remedies.

Profit from Social Responsibility?

One of the issues that has come up in the Finnish corporate social responsibility debate is whether responsible behaviour is in conflict with the profit-seeking goal set in the Finnish Companies Act. Listening to the arguments presented, a narrow, quarterly approach to business and a short-term goals have started to feel old-fashioned: modern and successful companies take a long view of profit-seeking and see corporate social responsibility as an added-value feature, not a cost item. These companies make social responsibility a part of their valuation alongside traditional performance indicators.

These companies also see corporate social responsibility as risk management in the sense that neglecting environmental issues or social obligations could ruin their entire business. Once lost, a reputation can be impossible to regain, and the consequences of bankruptcy affect every stakeholder group, from employees to investors and, ultimately, the economy as a whole. This same rising trend can also be seen in new responsible investment products, such as green bonds, and in the increasing popularity of social impact investing.

The French Example

The French have sought to solve the corporate social responsibility problem by enacting a ‘due diligence act’ (loi sur le devoir de vigilance) in 2017. This year is an interesting time in France, as the first reports required by the new act are being completed. It is an ambitious act, as it not only sets forth binding duties of care, but also provides for complaint and monitoring mechanisms, sanctions and damages. The act is built around a core of human rights and supply chain monitoring.

A Challenge for Finland’s Presidency

NGOs have been lobbying the EU for corporate social responsibility legislation for years. In Finland, this demand has come up, for example, in the Ykkösketjuun campaign, which is fronted by a large number of prominent companies, NGOs and trade unions. The Finnish Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment has a Committee on Corporate Social Responsibility, but there are no actual legislative initiatives relating to corporate social responsibility in the works.

Finland now has the opportunity to roll up its sleeves and put an EU-wide, binding corporate social responsibility act on the agenda of its EU presidency. As a model country of equality, openness and abiding by the law, this role would be a perfect fit for Finland. We can hope that the new Parliament about to be elected will find room for this on its own agenda, as well.

 

This blog was first published in Finnish on Finsif’s website on 27 March 2019 at https://www.finsif.fi/yritysvastuulaki-vastuullisuussaantelyn-seuraava-askel/

 

Latest references

We advise Fingrid Oyj in a transaction in which Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company is selling its holding of approximately 20 per cent of the shares in Fingrid to the Finnish State and OP Pohjola Kantaverkko Holding Ky. Fingrid owns Finland’s main electricity transmission grid and all significant cross-border transmission connections. The main grid is the backbone of the electricity transmission network, to which major power plants, industrial plants and regional electricity distribution networks are connected. 
Case published 11.2.2026
We acted as legal adviser to EcoUp Oyj in a directed share issue, through which EcoUp raised a total of approximately EUR 3 million in gross proceeds to strengthen the company’s capital structure and finance its growth. The share issue was directed to a limited group of domestic investors, deviating from the shareholders’ pre-emptive subscription right. EcoUp’s shares are traded on the First North Growth Market Finland marketplace maintained by Nasdaq Helsinki.  EcoUp promotes the green transition of the construction industry by producing carbon-neutral, energy-efficient and circular economy-based materials, services and technologies that help construction industry players reduce their environmental impact. The company has over 40 years of experience in developing and delivering circular economy solutions to customers.
Case published 29.1.2026
We acted as legal adviser to GEA Group AG in a directed share issue carried out by Solar Foods Oyj, in which GEA Finland Oy, a wholly owned subsidiary of GEA Group AG, acted as a cornerstone investor with an equity investment of EUR 8 million. Solar Foods raised a total of approximately EUR 25 million in gross proceeds from the share issue to accelerate the implementation of its new production facility Factory 02.  In connection with the share issue, GEA Liquid Technologies GmbH and Solar Foods signed an exclusivity agreement under which Solar Foods appoints GEA Liquid Technologies as its exclusive process equipment vendor for the supply, design, construction and delivery of the process equipment for the Factory 02. Additionally, the parties have undertaken to negotiate terms and conditions of a long-term strategic partnership in the area of gas fermentation and related technologies. GEA is one of the world’s largest systems suppliers for the food, beverage and pharmaceutical sectors. GEA’s portfolio includes machinery and plants as well as advanced process technology, components and comprehensive services. GEA is listed in the DAX and the STOXX® Europe 600 Index and is also among the companies comprising the DAX 50 ESG and MSCI Global Sustainability Indices. Solar Foods produces Solein®, a protein created using carbon dioxide and electricity. This innovative production method is independent of weather and climate conditions, eliminating the need for traditional agriculture. Founded in Finland in 2017, Solar Foods is listed on the Nasdaq First North Growth Market Finland.
Case published 26.1.2026
We advised S-Bank Plc in its issuance of a EUR 150 million Senior Non-Preferred Notes and on the tender offer of its EUR 150 million Senior Preferred MREL Eligible Notes maturing in 2026. The tender offer required prior approval from the Finnish Financial Stability Authority based on the Commission’s regulatory technical standards (EU) 2023/827. The Stability Authority granted S-Bank a permission for repurchases of the notes. Based on the permission, S-Bank replaced the notes with own funds or eligible liabilities instruments of equal or higher quality at terms that are sustainable for the income capacity of S-Bank. According to the final tender offer results published on 10 December 2025, S-Bank repurchased a total of EUR 97.9 million of the notes. The new notes will pay a floating interest rate, which is determined based on 3-month Euribor added with a margin of 1.35 per cent. The notes were issued on 11 December 2025 and listed on Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd. The maturity date of the notes is 11 December 2029. The purpose of the issue was to meet the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and to finance the bank’s activities.
Case published 18.12.2025