31.10.2023

New recommendation by the FIN-FSA: principles applied in communication with analysts should be addressed in the issuers’ disclosure policy

Related services

In its new Market newsletter 2/2023, the Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority (FIN-FSA) addresses the way issuers communicate with analysts and proposes good practices. Analysts play an important role in the market as their reports offer investors necessary help for assessing investment objects and are therefore likely to increase the attractiveness of companies as investment objects. 

Lately, issuers’ communication with analysts has been discussed in the media and among market participants, which makes the FIN-FSA’s recommendations for practices very welcome. A similar discussion was previously had in Sweden where the focus was on the aspect that analysts should not be better informed than the rest of the market and that issuers should not endeavour to guide the content of the analysts’ reports. In Finland, the discussion has mainly focused on the equal disclosure of information to the market.

Non-public material information should not be disclosed to analysts

In the Market newsletter, the FIN-FSA points out that an issuer cannot disclose inside information to analysts, i.e. information that has not been made public and is likely to materially affect the value of the issuer’s security. The FIN-FSA deems that this also applies in situations where the issuer communicates its own unpublished conclusions or comments on the views or assessments presented by analysts. It is essential that issuers do not provide analysts with information that has not yet been made available to the public.

Pursuant to the Finnish Securities Markets Act, in their communications, issuers must comply with the requirement of equal treatment, according to which issuers are liable to keep sufficient information on factors that may have a material effect on the value of the issuer’s security equally available to the investors. This being the case, an issuer should not disclose material information in meetings with analysts that it has not made public, as that would not make the material information equally available to all investors. Most of the analysts’ reports are not freely available, so any information disclosed to analysts will only benefit the investors who have access to said information. Disclosing material information to analysts is also likely to muddle communication with investors as the premise of the regulation is that an issuer will always first disclose any information that materially affects the value of the security by a stock exchange release. If material information finds its way to the market in some other manner than a stock exchange release, it may remain unclear whether the issuer deems the information material. Investors also cannot be presumed to follow other sources than stock exchange releases in the same way in order to receive material information.

Addressing communication with analysts in the disclosure policy

In the Market newsletter, the FIN-FSA deems that issuers should add to their disclosure policies the principles according to which they communicate with analysts. The FIN-FSA had not previously taken a position on the matter, so this is a new practice recommended by the FIN-FSA. In the Market newsletter, the FIN-FSA recommends that:

  • the issuer provides investors with the materials used in investor and analyst meetings and in publications of financial results on the issuer’s website, as up-to-date as possible;
  • the issuer arranges the analyst meetings and the briefings related to publications of financial results via the internet, if possible, in a format that is open to all interested participants;
  • the issuer does not comment on its valuation or the performance of its financial instrument when communicating with analysts;
  • the issuer does not comment on the analyst’s forecast or the level of result in the consensus forecast;
  • the issuer takes a reserved approach to commenting on analyses or reports by analysts and only comments on the correctness of information already published, if the issuer comments on analyses or reports at all.

In addition to the practices recommended by the FIN-FSA above, the issuer should assess the need to add the following factors to the disclosure policy:

  • who of the company’s representatives see to the communication with analysts and participate in analyst meetings;
  • when analyst meetings are arranged and whether the start of a silent period and/or the preparations for the next publication of financial results poses any restrictions on arranging analyst meetings;
  • where the information on the analyst meetings and their dates is announced (in the investor calendar on the website or somewhere else);
  • whether information on the analysts following the company and their estimates should be provided on the company website;
  • what are the objectives of the analyst meetings and other investor relations communication;
  • a note that the analysts’ opinions, estimates and forecasts are their own and do not represent or reflect the opinions, estimates and forecasts of the issuer or its management;
  • a principle specifying that the company does not favour any specific analyst or analysts;
  • a principle specifying whether the analyst meetings are recorded and whether the recordings are made available on the company website or not.

Practices followed in the communication to analysts should be assessed

Due to this new recommendation by the FIN-FSA, issuers should assess whether all of the best practices for analyst communications have been sufficiently taken into account in their disclosure policy. It is essential to assess whether the issuer has any practices that directly or indirectly create a risk of unintentionally communicating unpublished material information to analysts. This assessment should also consider the dates of analyst meetings and to the level of detail of the company’s unpublished financial information at the time the analyst meetings are arranged. In accordance with the established practice in the market, issuers have either a 30-day or 21-day silent period before publication of financial results. During this time, issuers do not usually arrange analyst meetings or communicate with analysts. It is also advisable for issuers to assess whether the practices related to analyst meetings are currently sufficiently transparent and whether increased transparency could dispel any doubts about the company disclosing material information to analysts.

Latest references

We advised Ålandsbanken Abp in the consent solicitation process regarding its SEK 150,000,000 Tier 2 notes due December 2041 and SEK 200,000,000 Tier 2 notes due March 2043. The terms and conditions of the aforementioned instruments were amended by removing the write-down mechanisms in the consent solicitation process. In addition, we advised Ålandsbanken Abp on the issue of SEK 350 million Additional Tier 1 notes. The notes bear floating interest at the rate of STIBOR three months plus a margin of 3.35 per cent per annum. The AT1 notes were issued on 20 November 2025, and admitted to trading on the official list of Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd. The instrument has no maturity date and qualifies as Additional Tier 1 capital in accordance with the EU Capital Requirements Regulation. The issue strengthens Ålandsbanken’s capital structure by taking advantage of favourable market conditions.
Case published 10.12.2025
We acted as the legal counsel to Enersize Plc, in its rights issue, where the company raised gross proceeds of approximately MSEK 8.3 in order to promote continued growth and be able to meet increased demand from its customers. The proceeds were allocated to market expansion and sales efforts as well as product, licence and technical validation and development, amongst other things. In connection with the rights issue, warrants were issued free of charge and the subscription period for new shares pursuant to the warrants will run from 1 October 2025 up to and including 15 October 2025. Enersize is a Finnish public limited company having its shares listed on Nasdaq Stockholm First North Growth Market. The company’s shares are traded only in Sweden. Enersize develops and provides software, tools, and services to improve the energy efficiency of industrial compressed air systems, serving industrial companies for whom energy efficiency is both an economic and environmental consideration. With the aim of reducing energy consumption, detecting leaks, and improving performance, its technology enables detailed monitoring, analysis, and real-time optimisation of compressed air systems. 
Case published 21.11.2025
We are acting as the joint legal advisor to Oomi Oy and Lumme Energia Oy in a transaction whereby Lumme Energia will merge with Oomi. As from the completion of the merger, the combined entity will be the largest electricity retail and service company in the Finnish market. In 2024, Oomi reported a turnover of EUR 373.9 million and had approximately 110 employees. Lumme Energia’s turnover for the same year was approximately EUR 314.6 million and it had approximately 50 employees. The transaction is primarily driven by the recent developments in the electricity market and the strategic goal to develop competitive products and services. Another key objective is to further enhance the customer experience, which is a shared value between the two companies. As a result of the merger, Lumme Energia’s customers will transfer to Oomi, and Lumme Energia will become one of Oomi’s shareholders. The completion of the transaction is subject to an approval by the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority.
Case published 29.8.2025
We are acting as the legal advisor to WithSecure Corporation in Diana BidCo Oy’s voluntary public cash tender offer for all the issued and outstanding shares in WithSecure. The tender offer values WithSecure’s total equity at approximately EUR 299 million. Diana BidCo is a private limited company incorporated and existing under the laws of Finland that will be indirectly owned by a consortium formed for purposes of the tender offer by certain affiliated funds of CVC Capital Partners Plc and Risto Siilasmaa. The consortium believes that the partnership strengthens and accelerates the road to WithSecure’s long-standing goal of becoming Europe’s most trusted cybersecurity partner by positioning the company to lead the next era of business cybersecurity. WithSecure’s shares are listed on the official list of Nasdaq Helsinki. WithSecure is a Europe-based cybersecurity company that helps protect businesses and is committed to strong partnerships with customers and collaborators. WithSecure’s customers trust WithSecure with outcome-based cybersecurity that protects and enables their operations. The completion of the tender offer is subject to the satisfaction or waiver by the offeror of certain customary conditions on or prior to the offeror’s announcement of the final results of the tender offer. The tender offer is currently expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2025. The Takeover Board of the Securities Markets Association issued on 4 August 2025 a new recommendation (1/2025) on good securities market practice that deals with the target company’s board of directors’ obligations in case of a consortium offer in which a major shareholder of the company participates in the consortium.
Case published 8.8.2025