31.10.2023

New recommendation by the FIN-FSA: principles applied in communication with analysts should be addressed in the issuers’ disclosure policy

In its new Market newsletter 2/2023, the Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority (FIN-FSA) addresses the way issuers communicate with analysts and proposes good practices. Analysts play an important role in the market as their reports offer investors necessary help for assessing investment objects and are therefore likely to increase the attractiveness of companies as investment objects. 

Lately, issuers’ communication with analysts has been discussed in the media and among market participants, which makes the FIN-FSA’s recommendations for practices very welcome. A similar discussion was previously had in Sweden where the focus was on the aspect that analysts should not be better informed than the rest of the market and that issuers should not endeavour to guide the content of the analysts’ reports. In Finland, the discussion has mainly focused on the equal disclosure of information to the market.

Non-public material information should not be disclosed to analysts

In the Market newsletter, the FIN-FSA points out that an issuer cannot disclose inside information to analysts, i.e. information that has not been made public and is likely to materially affect the value of the issuer’s security. The FIN-FSA deems that this also applies in situations where the issuer communicates its own unpublished conclusions or comments on the views or assessments presented by analysts. It is essential that issuers do not provide analysts with information that has not yet been made available to the public.

Pursuant to the Finnish Securities Markets Act, in their communications, issuers must comply with the requirement of equal treatment, according to which issuers are liable to keep sufficient information on factors that may have a material effect on the value of the issuer’s security equally available to the investors. This being the case, an issuer should not disclose material information in meetings with analysts that it has not made public, as that would not make the material information equally available to all investors. Most of the analysts’ reports are not freely available, so any information disclosed to analysts will only benefit the investors who have access to said information. Disclosing material information to analysts is also likely to muddle communication with investors as the premise of the regulation is that an issuer will always first disclose any information that materially affects the value of the security by a stock exchange release. If material information finds its way to the market in some other manner than a stock exchange release, it may remain unclear whether the issuer deems the information material. Investors also cannot be presumed to follow other sources than stock exchange releases in the same way in order to receive material information.

Addressing communication with analysts in the disclosure policy

In the Market newsletter, the FIN-FSA deems that issuers should add to their disclosure policies the principles according to which they communicate with analysts. The FIN-FSA had not previously taken a position on the matter, so this is a new practice recommended by the FIN-FSA. In the Market newsletter, the FIN-FSA recommends that:

  • the issuer provides investors with the materials used in investor and analyst meetings and in publications of financial results on the issuer’s website, as up-to-date as possible;
  • the issuer arranges the analyst meetings and the briefings related to publications of financial results via the internet, if possible, in a format that is open to all interested participants;
  • the issuer does not comment on its valuation or the performance of its financial instrument when communicating with analysts;
  • the issuer does not comment on the analyst’s forecast or the level of result in the consensus forecast;
  • the issuer takes a reserved approach to commenting on analyses or reports by analysts and only comments on the correctness of information already published, if the issuer comments on analyses or reports at all.

In addition to the practices recommended by the FIN-FSA above, the issuer should assess the need to add the following factors to the disclosure policy:

  • who of the company’s representatives see to the communication with analysts and participate in analyst meetings;
  • when analyst meetings are arranged and whether the start of a silent period and/or the preparations for the next publication of financial results poses any restrictions on arranging analyst meetings;
  • where the information on the analyst meetings and their dates is announced (in the investor calendar on the website or somewhere else);
  • whether information on the analysts following the company and their estimates should be provided on the company website;
  • what are the objectives of the analyst meetings and other investor relations communication;
  • a note that the analysts’ opinions, estimates and forecasts are their own and do not represent or reflect the opinions, estimates and forecasts of the issuer or its management;
  • a principle specifying that the company does not favour any specific analyst or analysts;
  • a principle specifying whether the analyst meetings are recorded and whether the recordings are made available on the company website or not.

Practices followed in the communication to analysts should be assessed

Due to this new recommendation by the FIN-FSA, issuers should assess whether all of the best practices for analyst communications have been sufficiently taken into account in their disclosure policy. It is essential to assess whether the issuer has any practices that directly or indirectly create a risk of unintentionally communicating unpublished material information to analysts. This assessment should also consider the dates of analyst meetings and to the level of detail of the company’s unpublished financial information at the time the analyst meetings are arranged. In accordance with the established practice in the market, issuers have either a 30-day or 21-day silent period before publication of financial results. During this time, issuers do not usually arrange analyst meetings or communicate with analysts. It is also advisable for issuers to assess whether the practices related to analyst meetings are currently sufficiently transparent and whether increased transparency could dispel any doubts about the company disclosing material information to analysts.

Latest references

We advised the Savings Banks Group on an arrangement whereby the shares in Sp-Henkivakuutus Oy were sold to Henki-Fennia and at the same time the parties agreed on a long-term distribution cooperation for insurance savings and loan protection products. The closing of the transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals. Sb Life Insurance is a domestic life insurance company, established in 2007, offering insurance savings and risk insurance products to private customers and companies. The Savings Banks and Oma Säästöpankki Oyj act as agents for Sp-Life Insurance. Henki-Fennia is a subsidiary of Keskinäinen Vakuutusyhtiö Fennia, specialising in voluntary life, pension and savings insurance.
Case published 11.4.2025
We advised Nokian Brewery Plc in its listing on Nasdaq First North Growth Market Finland. Investor demand in the IPO, which consisted of a public and institutional offering, was very strong and the IPO was oversubscribed. Nokian Brewery raised gross proceeds of approximately EUR 10 million from the IPO. In the IPO subscriptions were received from more than 2,900 investors and as a result of IPO the number of shareholders in the company increased to more than 4,700 shareholders. The IPO gives us a strong platform for the next years of growth. We are grateful to investors for their confidence and excited about what we can achieve together. This is the beginning of a new chapter in the Nokian Brewery story.  – Janne Paavola, CEO Trading in Nokian Brewery’s shares began on First North on 3 April 2025 with trading symbol BEER. Nokian Brewery is Finland’s second largest microbrewery and fifth largest brewery in terms of turnover in 2023. Nokian Brewery is particularly known for its Keisari beers. Nokian Panimo manufactures all its products at its production facility in Nokia, and in 2024 its sales volume totalled more than 8.3 million litres and turnover was EUR 11.9 million. Domesticity, responsibility and sustainable practices are at the heart of Nokian Brewery.
Case published 3.4.2025
We advised Fingrid Oyj on the Finnish law aspects of the update of an EMTN programme and increase to EUR 3 billion. Notes issued under the programme may be admitted to trading on Euronext Dublin. Fingrid Oyj is Finland’s transmission system operator.
Case published 2.4.2025
We have advised S-Bank Plc in four bond transactions totalling EUR 1.45 billion that provided financing for S-Bank’s acquisition of Svenska Handelsbanken AB’s Finnish private customer, asset management and investment services operations. In 2023, we advised S-Bank in supplementing their earlier bond programme and in the issuance of two new bonds. S-Bank’s first covered bond, valued at EUR 500 million, was issued in September 2023. In addition to general corporate purposes, the purpose of the issue was to finance the acquisition of Svenska Handelsbanken AB’s Finnish private customer, asset management and investment services operations. Further, a EUR 150 million senior preferred MREL eligible bond was issued in November 2023 and the purpose of the issue was to meet the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and to finance the bank’s activities. In 2024, we have advised S-Bank Plc in the update of a EUR 3 billion bond programme. Under the programme, S-Bank may issue senior preferred MREL eligible notes, covered bonds and additional tier 1 capital notes. In February of 2024, we advised S-Bank in its issuance of a EUR 300 million senior preferred MREL eligible bond and on the tender offer of its EUR 220 million senior preferred MREL eligible bond maturing in 2025. The tender offer required the prior permission of the Finnish Financial Stability Authority based on Commission Delegated Regulation 2023/827 on technical standards for the reduction of own funds and eligible liabilities prior authorisation. The Stability Authority granted S-Bank a permission for repurchases of the notes. Based on the permission, S-Bank replaced the notes with own funds or eligible liabilities instruments of equal or higher quality at terms that are sustainable for the income capacity of S-Bank. The final tender offer results were announced in February 2024. In April 2024, we further advised S-Bank in supplementing their base prospectus and issue of their second covered bond of EUR 500 million. The covered bond’s maturity date is 16 April 2030.
Case published 30.7.2024