21.7.2021

Building Contracts: Is the Alliance Model Best for Construction Projects?

The alliance model has been used over the past decade in many large and complex construction projects and is now increasingly being used in smaller and more straightforward projects as well.  Part of the reason for this is more than likely that alliance projects are regularly reported to have been successes.

Alliance projects are often million-euro investments and require years to complete, such as rail, tram and hospital projects. They naturally interest the public because of the impact they have on society and so get a great deal of media attention.

The ‘best for project’ principle developed in alliances is now trending in other implementation models, particularly because the quality of construction is currently a subject of heated debate. The general terms and conditions for alliance projects drafted by the Building Information Foundation RTS have also been in force for some time now.

Is the alliance model a good fit for all kinds of construction and is it always for the good of a project?

The Alliance Model and the ‘Best for Project’ Principle Support Enhanced Cooperation

An alliance is an organisation formed by the client, designers and contractors responsible for the design, implementation and other tasks in a construction project. All of the parties are responsible for the development and implementation of, and are subsequently liable for, the project together. The alliance members share the financial risks and benefits of the project and work closely together following principles of transparency.

The ‘best for project’ principle sets out that all of the actions taken within the alliance, such as tasks, organisation, resourcing, procurement and decisions, are aimed at achieving the common goals set for the project. The goals and actions of the parties to the alliance cannot be in conflict with the shared goals set for the project.

Cooperation during Design Phase a Clear Benefit, but Unfamiliarity with the Model is a Challenge

The alliance model may seem difficult and maybe even confusing to some operators in the contract chain. This can particularly be the case for subcontractors operating outside the core of the alliance, who are more used to ordinary projects run under the Finnish General Conditions for Building Contracts YSE 1998.

Alliance methodology may also be unfamiliar to parties joining the alliance, which can lead to the costs and efforts of the alliance being spent in the development phase on things that are not vital to the actual design.

The contractual relationships and liabilities between the parties may also get mixed up along the way. Continuous communication and transparency between all of the parties throughout the project is vital, as parties outside the core alliance are often tied to the alliance’s internal processes.

On the other hand, the alliance model has been found to work well in the project planning phase, as the various contractors can have their say alongside the client and main contractor before the implementation phase starts.

The best features of the alliance model shine in challenging and complex projects involving numerous parties. When properly applied, more traditional models, like total and turnkey contracts, are better suited to typical housebuilding or civil works than the alliance model. 

The upcoming reform of the Land Use and Building Act could also have a major impact on the use of the alliance model.  According to current information, the reform is intended to enact a variety of liability periods for the parties involved in building projects, which is a poor fit for the joint liability for the project and any defects that is the hallmark of the alliance model. 

What Is Best for a Project?

The amount of attention that construction problems receive in the media can easily drive the conversation towards using the alliance contracting in projects that the model is not a good fit for. The alliance model is very front-loaded with respect to resources and costs.

The advantages of the model are also wasted if the design stage is already well under way when the alliance is formed or if extensive cooperation is not necessary in the project.

It is important to keep an old wisdom in mind here: choosing the right implementation model for a project between and with help of the developers and consultants right from the start will promote good building— and that is what is best for any construction project.

Latest references

We are acting as the lead counsel to Fortum in a cross-border transaction in which Fortum is selling its recycling and waste business. The business is sold to thematic impact investing firm Summa Equity through its portfolio company NG Group. The debt-free purchase price is approximately EUR 800 million. The transaction is subject to authority approval and customary closing conditions. Fortum’s recycling and waste business to be sold comprises municipal and industrial waste management and end-to-end plastics, metals, ash, slag and hazardous waste treatment and recycling services. These businesses are located in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway and currently employ approximately 900 employees.
Case published 18.7.2024
We advised WasaGroup Ltd in a green transition project where WasaGroup will plan Hitachi Energy’s new production and technology campus in Mustasaari. WasaGroup will be responsible for planning, permitting, managing and conducting the entire project as well as for the tender processes. We advised WasaGroup in drafting and commenting the project management and financing agreements for the project. The Mustasaari campus will be approximately 30,000 square meters in size. The investment by Hitachi Energy will double the capacity for transformer production in Finland, and the product range will expand to include even larger transformers. The objective of the investment is to meet the demand for transformers and other modern technology that is increasing in Finland and internationally due to the green energy transition. The first phase of the project involved an agreement for a development project to prepare the building permit and reach sufficient planning readiness for the implementation of the project. The aim is to have the production and technology campus in use by 2027.
Case published 30.5.2024
We successfully represented a major Finnish construction company in a dispute and settlement negotiations concerning a large construction project. The dispute mainly concerned liabilities for additional and change works as well as project delays, and the value of the claims of the parties was approximately EUR 50 million.  If the case had not been settled, it would have been one of the largest construction disputes ever tried in the Finnish courts. The projected number of hearing days was unprecedentedly more than 300 days. To find an amicable solution to the extensive dispute, the parties engaged in settlement negotiations and court mediation. Eventually, the parties reached an amicable settlement to the full satisfaction of our client and thus the parties avoided the costs and risks of an extensive trial.
Case published 7.2.2024
Valio is a food company with the courage to change with the times. Valio’s road to growth and towards the innovative transformation of the food industry is supported by its long-standing business law partner, Castrén & Snellman. Juha Hölttä became Valio’s General Counsel at a time when the company kicked its new strategy into a higher gear. ‘In the past two years we have made several significant market initiatives and expanded our business from food production to other areas of the value chain. By acquiring Heinon Tukku, we now provide a new kind of added value to restaurants and professional kitchens through our Valio Aimo ® wholesale business. And our joint venture with St1, Suomen Lantakaasu Oy, will enable us to reach our goal of turning manure into biogas for heavy transportation,’ Hölttä describes some of the milestones of the new strategy. In addition to expanding into new business areas, Valio continues to build a more sustainable dairy business alongside seeking international growth from plant-based products. Valio has invested in the international growth of its Oddlygood ® brand through incorporation and gained additional product development expertise through the acquisition of Gold&Green. Carbon footprint of milk reduced by new business operations Dairy products are at the core of Valio’s business, and the company develops this strong foundation not only through product innovation but also at the beginning of the food chain. ‘Who could have foreseen that dairy farm manure could become one way of tackling climate challenges? Our planned biogas plants will use manure and agricultural by-products to produce renewable liquefied biogas for use as transportation fuel,’ says Hölttä. ‘Valio is aiming for a carbon-neutral milk chain by 2035. We are making major reforms in our operations in order to make this happen.’ The sustainability programme for Valio’s 3,700 dairy farms has been expanded, and it now includes the preventive and systematic healthcare of cows as well as actions related to grazing, the climate and biodiversity. ‘Appreciation for locally produced food is on the rise, which means that sustainability questions are local as well. This is a good trend, as it makes it easier for us to make a difference.’ ‘Strategic help even in difficult circumstances’ The service-mindedness of lawyers is key in implementing a growth strategy. Castrén & Snellman Attorneys is a long-standing partner of Valio, and the relationship between the two is tight. ‘At Valio, we are always exploring new business opportunities, and us lawyers are tasked with assessing these opportunities. My philosophy as the General Counsel is that my door is always open. Together we can evaluate how to solve and implement new initiatives. In this job, you must be curious, broad-minded and business-oriented,’ summarises Hölttä. Hölttä’s legal team of five people is supported by experts from Castrén & Snellman. The key to successful partnership is that both parties are familiar with each other’s business operations and ways of working. ‘Castrén & Snellman knows us well, and they maintain an up-to-date overview of our situation, which I highly appreciate. It means that we are able to tackle tricky situations together quickly even in difficult circumstances.’ A joint fast reaction was needed, for example, when Valio exited the Russian market after the country launched its war of aggression on Ukraine. ‘The responsible thing was to leave quickly but in a controlled manner and by repatriating our investment as opposed to leaving an operational food production facility in the hands of a country that was waging war.’ A shared vision of sustainability Valio – Together we make life better A Finnish food company Approx. 4,600 employees Owned by 13 Finnish dairy cooperatives Finland’s most sustainable brand in the Sustainable Brand Index study Read more about sustainability at Valio Castrén & Snellman – Building sustainable success stories Forerunner of demanding legal services 300 employees Owned by its partners ‘We help our clients build sustainable success stories and achieve their sustainability goals.’ Read more about sustainability at Castrén & Snellman Shared success stories of Valio and C&S Global Brand Portfolio Management and IP Enforcement Purchase of Gold&Green’s Brand, IPR and R&D Function Joint Venture for Biogas Production with St1 Sale of Russian Operations Acquisition of Heinon Tukku Significant Growth Funding Round Competition Damages Case Defending Against Environmental Permit Challenge at the Appellate Level
Case published 4.5.2023