19.6.2023

Latest news in climate law: the appeal concerning the sufficiency of the state’s climate actions ruled inadmissible by the SAC

Background

Finland’s new Climate Act entered into force in July 2022. Amendments to the Act were approved in December 2022, and on 1 January 2023 the Climate Act was amended with provisions that concern appealing decisions made thereunder.

On 28 November 2022, before the amendments entered into force, the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation and Greenpeace Norden filed an appeal to the Supreme Administrative Court, requesting that the Finnish Government’s decision on the Annual Climate Report 2022 be revoked and sent back to preparation. This was the first time the sufficiency of the state’s climate actions was challenged in court in Finland. According to the NGOs, the Government had failed in its duty to take the necessary additional actions in terms of carbon sinks to ensure the realisation of the targets set out in the Climate Act.

Supreme Administrative Court ruled the appeal inadmissible

Under its decision of 7 June 2023, the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) dismissed the NGOs’ appeal.

The SAC examined the admissibility of the appeal very broadly, referring for example to the Finnish constitution. While the SAC ended up ruling the appeal inadmissible, it stated, among other things, that assessing the legality of the Government’s decision-making as intended by the appellants could be examined by the court in such a case that failure to make a decision would lead to an outcome contrary to the Climate Act or that the Government’s actual actions would show that it has no intention of making appropriate decisions in order to achieve the goals and obligations required by the Climate Act in a sufficiently short time frame.

The SAC further stated that the appealability of the Annual Climate Report should not be assessed differently based on the regulation on appeals under the amended Climate Act.

Case law regarding climate actions likely to be specified in future

It is noteworthy that pursuant to the SAC’s decision, the passiveness of the Government could be examined by the court in the abovementioned situation. Furthermore, the decision of the SAC was reached only after a vote. The minority of the formation of the court found the Government decision to be admissible for appeal. Therefore, it is to be expected that the sufficiency of the Government’s climate actions will be challenged in Finnish courts again.

See also:

Latest news in climate law: Climate Act amended and Finland’s first climate litigation case filed

New Climate Change Act aims at carbon neutrality

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy. 
Case published 9.9.2026