10.3.2015

Winds of Change for Domain Names

The overhaul of Finnish electronic communications legislation, i.e. the Information Society Code, also touches on the domain name business. In this respect, the goal of the new legislation is above all to clarify the roles of the Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority (FICORA) and domain name brokers by offering customers a one-stop shop.

This amendment will bring the Finnish domain name business into the widely used international broker model. As opposed to the rest of the Information Society Code, the domain name sections of Code the will not enter into force until 5 September 2016.

Change to International Broker Model 

At the moment, domain names are applied for using a mixed model, in which either the party applying for a domain name itself or a broker voluntarily selected by the party applies for the domain name directly to FICORA. Elsewhere in Europe, a broker model has been adopted in which the domain name broker handles all contacts with the customer.

The Information Society Code will bring Finland from the current mixed model into the broker model, which can be characterised as a one-stop-shop. In future, domain name applicants will get all the services from a single source, their domain name broker. This means that applicants will no longer contact FICORA directly, but through their broker. Because brokers will have a larger role, their operations will also be more regulated in order to ensure the quality and
efficiency of customer service.

However, it’s worth keeping in mind that FICORA will still be the one granting domain names, even though brokers will be handling contact with the customers. FICORA will also continue to maintain the administrative domain name register and the .fi domain name service. In addition, FICORA will supervise the operations of domain name brokers.

Foreign Companies and Private Individuals to Be Allowed Apply for .fi Domain Names 

The current Domain Name Act provides the general requirements for granting domain names. At the moment, .fi domains can be granted to legal persons or private entrepreneurs registered in Finland as well as to Finnish public sector entities, state enterprises, independent public services, public associations and diplomatic missions of foreign states.

Under the new Information Society Code, these requirements will be removed. In future, obtaining a .fi domain name will not require the same kind of connection to Finland as under the current law. The home municipality and minimum age of 15 requirements will also be dropped. This means that it will be possible to grant .fi domain names to foreign legal persons, private entrepreneurs or other organisations or legal persons. This significant change will particularly benefit foreign companies offering their services in Finland, but also Finnish private individuals who are resident abroad. 

Content Restrictions for Domain Names to Be Removed 

The Information Society Code also affects the form and content of domain names. Under the new Code, domain names can have a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 63 characters.

The new regulatory framework removes several restrictions permissible domain names. In the future, domain names expressing only a corporate form, such as oy.fi, will be allowed (“Oy” being a Finnish equivalent to, e.g., “Ltd”). It will also be possible for Finnish domain names to consist of just global top-level domains or country domains (with the Finnish ccltd “.fi” added). This change is based on the adoption of new top-level domains. For example, under prior legislation, the adoption of the planned .helsinki domain would have prevented the simultaneous use of the existing helsinki.fi address. The restrictions on the use of first and last name combinations will also be dropped. The protection of trade names and trademarks will remain unchanged. When applying for a domain name, one will still have to ensure that it does not infringe another party’s protected trade name or trademark.

 
  

Latest references

We acted as legal advisor to eQ Fund Management Company Ltd in a structural arrangement in which Special Investment Fund eQ Residential Fund and Special Investment Fund eQ Residential Fund II transferred their assets to the newly launched Special Investment Fund eQ Residential Fund III. In connection with the arrangement, eQ Residential Fund III raised 37 million euros in new capital, and its fundraising will continue throughout 2025.  The portfolio of eQ Residential Fund III consists of 19 residential properties completed between 2021 and 2024, comprising nearly 1,400 apartments located in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Turku, and Tampere.
Case published 21.5.2025
We assisted eQ Community Properties Fund in the sale of two healthcare properties to a fund managed by Northern Horizon. The properties have a total floor area of approximately 3,500 square meters. The two properties are located in Espoo and Lahti. The Espoo asset was completed in 2018 and the Lahti asset was completed in 2023. Both assets are operated by Attendo, the leading care provider in the Nordic region.
Case published 9.5.2025
We successfully represented BMW in an exceptionally long dispute over whether the spare rims sold by the defendant and the hub caps included in them infringed BMW’s trademark and design rights. The Market Court found that the sign used by the defendant caused a likelihood of confusion with BMW’s trademarks. The defendant had used the sign on the hub caps and in the marketing of the hub caps and rims, leading the Market Court to find that the defendant had infringed BMW’s trademark rights. The defendant admitted to infringing BMW’s Community design but denied the related injunction claim. However, the Market Court found that there was no particular reason to refrain from issuing an injunction. The Market Court prohibited the defendant from continuing to infringe BMW’s trademarks and Community design and ordered the defendant to alter or destroy the products and marketing materials that infringed BMW’s rights. Furthermore, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay BMW EUR 70,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 80,000 in damages for the trademark infringements, as well as EUR 7,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 8,000 in damages for the design right infringement. The amounts can be considered exceptionally high in Finland. Additionally, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay a significant portion of BMW’s legal costs with interest on late payment. In its decision of 11 March 2025, the Supreme Court of Finland did not grant the defendant leave to appeal, and also decided that there was no need to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union. Thus, the Market Court’s judgements (MAO:494/18 and 517/2023) are final. In addition to the main dispute, BMW demanded in a separate proceeding that one of the defendant’s trademark registrations be revoked. A total of three separate legal proceedings were conducted in the Market Court regarding the revocation. The defendant’s trademark registration was ultimately revoked.
Case published 9.5.2025
We are advising DNA Plc in brand protection and intellectual property enforcement matters globally. Our intellectual property team manages DNA’s global trademark portfolio, including registration, prosecution, opposition and enforcement. We also advise DNA in questions concerning consumer and marketing law, unfair competition, social media, domain names and cybersquatting. DNA Plc is one of Finland’s leading telecommunication companies. DNA offers connections, services and devices for homes and workplaces, contributing to the digitalisation of society. The company has approximately 3.7 million subscriptions in its fixed and mobile communications networks. In 2024, DNA’s total revenue was EUR 1,100 million, and the company employs about 1,600 people around Finland. DNA is part of Telenor Group.
Case published 7.5.2025