21.2.2017

The Unified Patent System – Where Do We Stand Now?

Lately, there has been a lot of discussion around the UPC and European patents with unitary effect. But what is the UPC and what does it mean in practice? What are European patents with unitary effect and how do they differentiate from the traditional European patents?

Towards an Enhanced European Patent System

First of all, the UPC relates to the European-wide patent reform. The UPC, which is an abbreviation for the Unified Patent Court, is a planned single patent court covering 25 EU member states. If established, the UPC would be a common court to all member states contracting to the Unified Patent Court Agreement.

The purpose is that the UPC would have exclusive jurisdiction over both future European patents with unitary effect, European patents validated in one or more EU member state which is a party to the Unified Patent Court Agreement, supplementary protection certificates issued for a product covered by such a patent and European patent applications − the jurisdiction, however, being subject to certain exceptions during the transitional period. The UPC’s rulings would have effect in those contracting member states that have ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement. The UPC would not have any jurisdiction over national patents or supplementary protection certificates granted for a national patent. After the reform, the Finnish Market Court would still have jurisdiction over Finnish national patents and supplementary protection certificates granted for a Finnish patent.

The European patent with unitary effect − the unitary patent − would be a new, supranational option to have patent protection in Europe. At the moment a European patent needs to be validated in each contracting state where patent protection is desired. This means in practice that a patent holder has a bundle of national patents. A unitary patent would only consist of a one single patent providing patent protection in the member states who are participating in the enhanced cooperation procedure.

After the reform, unitary patents and traditional European patents will be granted by European Patent Office (EPO). The pre-grant phase at the EPO is not subject to change. When the EPO has granted a European patent, the patent holder can file a request for unitary effect, i.e., a uniform patent protection in the participating member states.    

When Will All This Happen?

To date, the implementation of the unified patent system is still ongoing. In order for the entire system to come into force, the Unified Patent Court Agreement must be ratified by at least thirteen EU member states (including the high-profile patent countries: the UK, France and Germany). At the moment, the following member states have ratified the agreement: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal and Sweden. Last autumn, the UK government confirmed it is continuing with preparations for ratification of the Unified Patent Court Agreement despite Brexit.

According to the latest information, the UPC Preparatory Committee, which is an entity responsible for establishment of the UPC, is currently working under the assumption that the Provisional Application Phase (PAP) will start this spring, most likely in May 2017. In practice, the PAP means that the UPC organisation will be established.

The assumption is that the Unified Patent Court Agreement will enter into force and the UPC will become operational in December of this year. Before the UPC becomes operational, the patent holders or applicants have the possibility to opt out their already-existing European patents or patent applications from the new UPC system for the whole life-time of that patent. This sunrise period for opting out patents will be a minimum of 3 months. The current plan is that the opt-out period will start in September 2017. As the sunrise period is somewhat short, it is worth making some contingency plans in this regard and considering implementing the opt-out (if so desired) already in the beginning of the sunrise period in order have sufficient time to deal with any possible queries or difficulties in the opt-out registration procedure.

Latest references

We advised G&W Electric with its acquisition of Safegrid Oy, a leading provider of intelligent grid monitoring solutions based in Finland. The acquisition accelerates G&W Electric’s long-term strategy to integrate intelligent monitoring and predictive analytics into its power distribution portfolio, strengthening its offering to utility customers worldwide. Founded in 1905 and headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois, G&W Electric is a global leader in innovative power grid solutions, with a presence in over 100 countries. The company is known for advanced load and fault interrupting switches, reclosers, sensors, system protection equipment, power grid automation, intelligent grid monitoring, and transmission and distribution cable accessories. Safegrid is a Finnish technology company headquartered in Espoo, Finland. The company develops the Intelligent Grid System®, a grid monitoring solution that combines instant-on wireless sensors with advanced analytics to deliver real-time insight into grid conditions, enabling utilities to identify emerging issues, anticipate failures, and reduce outage duration across medium and high voltage distribution and transmission networks.
Case published 8.5.2026
We advised Kiwa in its acquisition of Sertio Oy, a Finnish notified body designated by the authority in accordance with the EU Regulation on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR). Sertio provides conformity assessment services in accordance with IVDR. Kiwa is one of the world’s leading testing, inspection, and certification companies, operating in over 35 countries. 
Case published 7.5.2026
We advised Metsäkonepalvelu Oy in its acquisition of the entire share capital of Junnonen Forest Oy, a Finnish timber harvesting services company, and the timber harvesting services business of Lamerit Oy. The acquisition supports Metsäkonepalvelu’s growth strategy and strengthens the company’s position, particularly in southeastern Finland. Metsäkonepalvelu is a portfolio company of A. Ahlström Oy, a Finnish family-owned industrial owner. The company provides mechanical timber harvesting services to forest companies, large private forest owners, and the public sector in Finland and Sweden. Metsäkonepalvelu Group employs nearly two hundred forestry professionals.
Case published 6.5.2026
We acted as Finnish counsel to Scanreco in its acquisition of CrossControl. Mannheimer Swartling (Sweden) acted as lead counsel for Scanreco. CrossControl, founded in Sweden, is a high-tech supplier of advanced display computers and central vehicle computing solutions for industrial vehicles and machines. Scanreco is a world leading supplier of professional radio remote control systems to international machinery, heavy equipment, and crane manufacturers. The combined group comprises approximately 600 employees and generates annual revenue of around SEK 1.4 billion.
Case published 5.5.2026